IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aare07/9457.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Bioeconomic Analysis of the Duration of Conservation Contracts

Author

Listed:
  • Crowe, Bronwyn
  • White, Benedict

Abstract

Conservation and restoration of native vegetation is often a gradual process which may require many years to transform an ecosystem from one vegetative state to a target ecosystem. This process is stochastic, with some changes potentially irreversible. In contrast, contracts with landholders to undertake conservation measures on their property are typically for less than ten years and often make no contingencies for re-contracting at the end of the contract period. The risk to land holders and conservation agencies of contracts not being renewed and the consequent potential loss of previous investment means including covenants in conservation contracts may be attractive to both parties. A model is developed to empirically examine the optimal dynamic conservation contract and the possible role of covenants in the costs and benefits of contracts.

Suggested Citation

  • Crowe, Bronwyn & White, Benedict, 2007. "A Bioeconomic Analysis of the Duration of Conservation Contracts," 2007 Conference (51st), February 13-16, 2007, Queenstown, New Zealand 9457, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aare07:9457
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.9457
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/9457/files/cp07cr13.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.9457?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fackler, Paul L. & Haight, Robert G., 2014. "Monitoring as a partially observable decision problem," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 226-241.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Resource /Energy Economics and Policy;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aare07:9457. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaresea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.