IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea16/236006.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Effect of the Timing of Farm Transfer Initiation on Terminal Wealth in the Business: Simulation Model

Author

Listed:
  • Protopop, Iuliia
  • Boehlje, Michael
  • Stockton, Matthew
  • Bradley, Lubben

Abstract

This study presents a conceptual framework and empirical farm-level model of wealth creation and accumulation and incorporates the life-cycle patterns in farmer productivity and consumption to analyze how the timing of farm transfer initiation from the older to the younger generation impacts the terminal wealth in the business and thus the likelihood of the firm’s future continuity. The results of a representative large grain farm in Iowa confirm that the timing of a transfer is determined by two major tradeoffs: first, between the younger generation’s productivity and consumption withdrawals and, second, between the firm’s growth and transfer taxes. Given the age of both farmers (older and younger) used to populate the model and their respective consumption levels, the gain in total farm’s productivity is much lower compared to the loss of equity associated with additional consumption withdrawals resulting in reduced firm’s growth. Therefore, early transfer is not encouraged when no off-farm income is available and/or tax savings cannot justify the reduced firm’s growth. Generally, a preferred timing strategy is responsive to the availability of off-farm income (or level of equity withdrawals for younger generation’s consumption), the type of business model used to involve the younger generation in the farm business prior to the transfer initiation (active or passive successor), and expectations about farmland prices.

Suggested Citation

  • Protopop, Iuliia & Boehlje, Michael & Stockton, Matthew & Bradley, Lubben, 2016. "The Effect of the Timing of Farm Transfer Initiation on Terminal Wealth in the Business: Simulation Model," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 236006, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea16:236006
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.236006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/236006/files/AAEA2016_ProtopopBoehljeStocktonLubben.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.236006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Harris, James Michael & Mishra, Ashok K. & Williams, Robert P., 2012. "The Impact Of Farm Succession Decisions On The Financial Performance Of The Farm," 2012 Annual Meeting, August 12-14, 2012, Seattle, Washington 124749, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    2. Lordkipanidze, Nazibrola & Tauer, Loren W., 2000. "Farmer Efficiency and Technology Use with Age," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 29(1), pages 24-31, April.
    3. Glauben, Thomas & Tietje, Hendrik & Weiss, Christoph R., 2002. "Intergenerational Succession on Family Farms: Evidence from Survey Data," 2002 International Congress, August 28-31, 2002, Zaragoza, Spain 24918, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    4. Michael D. Boehlje & Ludwig M. Eisgruber, 1972. "Strategies for the Creation and Transfer of the Farm Estate," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 54(3), pages 461-472.
    5. Michael R. Langemeier & George F. Patrick, 1990. "Farmers' Marginal Propensity to Consume: An Application to Illinois Grain Farms," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 72(2), pages 309-316.
    6. Loren Tauer, 1995. "Age and Farmer Productivity," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 17(1), pages 63-69.
    7. Langemeier, Michael R. & Snider, Lindsey, 2009. "Marginal Propensity to Consume for a Sample of Kansas Farms," 2009 Annual Meeting, January 31-February 3, 2009, Atlanta, Georgia 45971, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    8. Hoppe, Robert A. & MacDonald, James M., 2013. "Updating the ERS Farm Typology," Economic Information Bulletin 147120, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    9. Mishra, Ashok K. & El-Osta, Hisham S. & Shaik, Saleem, 2010. "Succession Decisions in U.S. Family Farm Businesses," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 35(1), pages 1-20.
    10. Ayal Kimhi & Ramon Lopez, 1999. "A Note on Farmers' Retirement and Succession Considerations: Evidence from a Household Survey," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(1), pages 154-162, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zou, Baoling & Mishra, Ashok K. & Luo, Biliang, 2018. "Aging population, farm succession, and farmland usage: Evidence from rural China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 437-445.
    2. Denis Nadolnyak & Valentina Hartarska & Bretford Griffin, 2019. "The Impacts of Economic, Demographic, and Weather Factors on the Exit of Beginning Farmers in the United States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-17, August.
    3. Tauer, Loren, 2019. "Farmer productivity by age in the United States," International Journal of Agricultural Management, Institute of Agricultural Management, vol. 8(2), August.
    4. Andrew P. Barnes, 2023. "The role of family life‐cycle events on persistent and transient inefficiencies in less favoured areas," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 74(1), pages 295-315, February.
    5. Glauben, Thomas & Tietje, Hendrik & Weiss, Christoph R., 2002. "Intergenerational Successionon Family Farms: Evidence from Survey Data," FE Working Papers 0202, Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Department of Food Economics and Consumption Studies.
    6. Muhammad Abid Shahzad & Syed Abubakr & Christian Fischer, 2021. "Factors Affecting Farm Succession and Occupational Choices of Nominated Farm Successors in Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-17, November.
    7. Dudek, Michał, 2016. "A matter of family? An analysis of determinants of farm succession in Polish agriculture," Studies in Agricultural Economics, Research Institute for Agricultural Economics, vol. 118(2), pages 1-7, August.
    8. Ashok Mishra & Hisham El-Osta, 2008. "Effect of agricultural policy on succession decisions of farm households," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 6(3), pages 285-307, September.
    9. Tu, Vo Hong & Kopp, Steven W. & Trang, Nguyen Thuy & Hong, Nguyen Bich & Yabe, Mitsuyasu, 2021. "Land accumulation: An option for improving technical and environmental efficiencies of rice production in the Vietnamese Mekong Delta," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    10. Glauben, Thomas & Tietje, Hendrik & Weiss, Christoph R., 2005. "Analysing Family Farm Succession: A Probit and a Competing Risk Approach," 2005 International Congress, August 23-27, 2005, Copenhagen, Denmark 24699, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    11. Foltz, Renee D. & Marshall, Maria I., 2012. "Family Business Decision-Making: Factors and Influences on Choosing a Successor," 2012 Annual Meeting, August 12-14, 2012, Seattle, Washington 124272, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    12. Chatterjee, Diti & Dinar, Ariel & González-Rivera, Gloria, 2019. "Impact of Agricultural Extension on Irrigated Agriculture Production and Water Use in California," Journal of the ASFMRA, American Society of Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers, vol. 2019.
    13. Pessotto, Ana Paula & Costa, Carlos & Schwinghamer, Timothy & Colle, Gabriel & Corte, Vitor Francisco Dalla, 2019. "Factors influencing intergenerational succession in family farm businesses in Brazil," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    14. Banovic, Marija & Duesberg, Stefanie & Renwick, Alan & Keane, Mark & Bogue, Pat, 2015. "The Field: Land mobility measures as seen through the eyes of Irish farmers," 89th Annual Conference, April 13-15, 2015, Warwick University, Coventry, UK 204200, Agricultural Economics Society.
    15. Gessner, Heather & Chowdhury, Niaz Murshed & Clary, Reid & Akinyemi, Abidemi & Moges, Michael & Quaye, Archibold, 2014. "The next generation of South Dakota producers, are the operations prepared for the transition of assets and management?," MPRA Paper 90823, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Ondersteijn, C. J. M. & Giesen, G. W. J. & Huirne, R. B. M., 2003. "Identification of farmer characteristics and farm strategies explaining changes in environmental management and environmental and economic performance of dairy farms," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 78(1), pages 31-55, October.
    17. Glauben, Thomas & Tietje, Hendrik & Weiss, Christoph R., 2004. "Sussession In Agriculture: A Probit And Competing Risk Analysis," 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO 20067, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    18. Glauben, Thomas & Tietje, Hendrik & Weiss, Christoph R., 2002. "Farm Succession Plans And Actual Behaviour: Evidence From A Household Survey And Census Data," 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA 19691, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    19. M.A.P.M. van Asseldonk & H.B. van der Veen & H.A.B. van der Meulen, 2010. "Retirement planning by Dutch farmers: rationality or randomness?," Agricultural Finance Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 70(3), pages 365-376, November.
    20. Khanal, Aditya R. & Mishra, Sachin K & Honey, Ummey, 2018. "Certified organic food production, financial performance, and farm size: An unconditional quantile regression approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 367-376.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea16:236006. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.