IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/zbw/arlaba/234972.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Wie sind die mitteldeutsche Metropolregion und ihre Aktivitäten zu bewerten?

In: "Metropolregion Mitteldeutschland" aus raumwissenschaftlicher Sicht

Author

Listed:
  • Rosenfeld, Martin T. W.

Abstract

Eine Ex-post-Evaluierung zur Abschätzung der "Metropolregions-Rendite" für die an der Metropolregion beteiligten Städte, Kreise und sonstigen Akteure war im Rahmen der Arbeitsgruppe der ARL zur "Metropolregion Mitteldeutschland" nicht möglich. Um dennoch zumindest ein vorläufiges Fazit hinsichtlich des Nutzens der Metropolregion ziehen zu können, wird der Ansatz einer Ex-ante-Evaluierung verfolgt. Es wird gefragt, welcher Erfolg auf der Basis der gegebenen Strukturelemente der Metropolregion (räumliche Abgrenzung, inhaltliche Aufgaben, Governance-Strukturen) erwartet werden kann. Grundsätzlich zeigt sich eine relativ große Übereinstimmung zwischen den normativen Anforderungen an Metropolregionen und den aktuellen institutionellen Ausprägungen der "Metropolregion Mitteldeutschland". Zu kritisieren ist allerdings, dass die Aufgaben der Metropolregion bislang zum großen Teil wenig konkret und bisherige Erfolge nicht sichtbar sind, sowie dass die räumliche Abgrenzung nicht explizit verdeutlicht wird. Abschließend werden Perspektiven für die raumordnungspolitische Behandlung des mitteldeutschen Raums außerhalb der Metropolregion sowie für die weitere Forschung aufgezeigt.

Suggested Citation

  • Rosenfeld, Martin T. W., 2021. "Wie sind die mitteldeutsche Metropolregion und ihre Aktivitäten zu bewerten?," Arbeitsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Rosenfeld, Martin T. W. & Stefansky, Andreas (ed.), "Metropolregion Mitteldeutschland" aus raumwissenschaftlicher Sicht, volume 30, pages 194-206, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:arlaba:234972
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/234972/1/1759789917.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oecd, 2019. "Investing in the skills of adult immigrants," Adult Skills in Focus 11, OECD Publishing.
    2. Andrew Greenland & Mihai Ion & John Lopresti, 2019. "Exports, investment and policy uncertainty," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 52(3), pages 1248-1288, August.
    3. Franz, Peter, 2011. "Politische Institutionalisierung und Governance-Formen der deutschen Metropolregionen im Vergleich," Wirtschaft im Wandel, Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH), vol. 17(11), pages 387-394.
    4. Banuri’s, Sheheryar & de Oliveira, Angela C.M. & Eckel, Catherine C., 2019. "Care provision: An experimental investigation," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 615-630.
    5. Kacperczyk, Marcin & Nosal, Jaromir & Stevens, Luminita, 2019. "Investor sophistication and capital income inequality," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 18-31.
    6. ., 2019. "Socially responsible investment," Chapters, in: Intergenerational Equity, chapter 6, pages 90-154, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    7. Olson, Mancur, Jr, 1969. "The Principle of "Fiscal Equivalence": The Division of Responsibilities among Different Levels of Government," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 59(2), pages 479-487, May.
    8. repec:arp:tjssrr:2019:p:999-1004 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Oecd, 2019. "Measuring indirect investments in ICT," OECD Digital Economy Papers 276, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rosenfeld, Martin T. W. & Stefansky, Andreas (ed.), 2021. ""Metropolregion Mitteldeutschland" aus raumwissenschaftlicher Sicht," Arbeitsberichte der ARL, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft, volume 30, number 30, January.
    2. John D. Donahue, 1997. "Tiebout? Or Not Tiebout? The Market Metaphor and America's Devolution Debate," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 11(4), pages 73-81, Fall.
    3. Andreas Fagereng & Luigi Guiso & Davide Malacrino & Luigi Pistaferri, 2020. "Heterogeneity and Persistence in Returns to Wealth," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 88(1), pages 115-170, January.
    4. Stephen Billings & Thomas Thibodeau, 2011. "Intrametropolitan Decentralization: Is Government Structure Capitalized in Residential Property Values?," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 42(4), pages 416-450, May.
    5. Iain Begg, 2009. "Regulation and Supervision of Financial Intermediaries in the EU: The Aftermath of the Financial Crisis," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(5), pages 1107-1128, November.
    6. Jean-Marc Bourgeon & Marie-Laure Breuillé, 2023. "Citizen preferences and the architecture of government," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 61(3), pages 537-585, October.
    7. Thomas Blanchet & Juliette Fournier & Thomas Piketty, 2022. "Generalized Pareto Curves: Theory and Applications," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 68(1), pages 263-288, March.
    8. Ehtisham Ahmad, 2010. "Improving Governance in Pakistan: Changing Perspectives on Decentralisation," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 49(4), pages 283-310.
    9. Bernhard Seidel & Dieter Vesper, 1999. "Fiscal Federalism: An International Comparison," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 183, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    10. Melle Marco C., 2014. "Eine europäische Bemessungsgrundlage für die Körperschaftsteuer? Konzeption und ordnungsökonomische Analyse / Conceptual design and constitutional economics analysis of a European tax base for corpora," ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, De Gruyter, vol. 65(1), pages 133-156, January.
    11. Karl Schulz, 2021. "Redistribution of Return Inequality," CESifo Working Paper Series 8996, CESifo.
    12. Hofreither, Markus F., 2007. "EU-Haushaltsreform und Agrarbudget - nationale Kofinanzierung als Lösungsansatz?," Discussion Papers DP-30-2007, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Department of Economics and Social Sciences, Institute for Sustainable Economic Development.
    13. Veldkamp, Laura & Farboodi, Maryam, 2018. "Long Run Growth of Financial Data Technology," CEPR Discussion Papers 13278, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    14. Huffman, Wallace E., 1999. "Finance, Organization, and Impacts of U.S. Agricultural Research: Future Prospects," ISU General Staff Papers 199903010800001315, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    15. Schläpfer, Felix & Baur, Ivo, 2017. "Does CAP spending reflect taxpayer preferences? An analysis of expenditures for public goods and income redistribution in relation to preference indicators," 2017 International Congress, August 28-September 1, 2017, Parma, Italy 261105, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    16. Samuel Adams & Kingsley Agomor, 2020. "Decentralization, Partisan Politics, and National Development in Ghana," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 351-366, June.
    17. Huberto M. Ennis & Santiago M. Pinto & Alberto Porto, 2006. "Choosing a place to live and a workplace," Económica, Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, vol. 0(1-2), pages 15-51, January-D.
    18. Savitar Sundaresan & Jaromir Nosal & Marcin Kacperczyk, 2017. "Market Power and Informational Efficiency," 2017 Meeting Papers 356, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    19. Michael Fotos, 2015. "Vincent Ostrom’s revolutionary science of association," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 163(1), pages 67-83, April.
    20. John Stachurski, 2019. "Firm Entry and Exit with Unbounded Productivity Growth," Papers 1910.14023, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2024.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:arlaba:234972. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/arlhade.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.