IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/pal/intecp/978-1-349-01989-2_14.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Continuity of the Expected Utility

In: Allocation under Uncertainty: Equilibrium and Optimality

Author

Listed:
  • F. Delbaen

    (Core
    University Of Brussels)

Abstract

This paper is devoted to proving a more general version of proposition 2.1 of [6]. For any unexplained notion we refer to Dieter Sondermann’s paper [6].

Suggested Citation

  • F. Delbaen, 1974. "Continuity of the Expected Utility," International Economic Association Series, in: Jacques H. Drèze (ed.), Allocation under Uncertainty: Equilibrium and Optimality, chapter 14, pages 254-256, Palgrave Macmillan.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:intecp:978-1-349-01989-2_14
    DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-01989-2_14
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Frank H. Page & Myrna H. Wooders, 2009. "Endogenous Network Dynamics," Working Papers 2009.28, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    2. Jean-Michel Grandmont, 1976. "Théorie de l'équilibre temporaire général," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 27(5), pages 805-843.
    3. Yu Chen & Zhenhua Wu, 2012. "Delegation Principle for Multi-agency Games under Ex Post Equilibrium," CAEPR Working Papers 2012-008, Center for Applied Economics and Policy Research, Department of Economics, Indiana University Bloomington.
    4. repec:inu:caeprp:2012-008 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Bo Chen & Yu Chen & David Rietzke, 2020. "Simple contracts under observable and hidden actions," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 69(4), pages 1023-1047, June.
    6. Yu Chen, 2013. "Bilateral Mechanism Design: Practical Contracting in Multi-Agency," CAEPR Working Papers 2013-003, Center for Applied Economics and Policy Research, Department of Economics, Indiana University Bloomington.
    7. Gong, Rui & Page, Frank & Wooders, Myrna, 2015. "Endogenous correlated network dynamics," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 65098, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Bo Chen & Yu Chen & David Rietzke, 2017. "Simple Contracts under Observable and Hidden Actions," Graz Economics Papers 2017-07, University of Graz, Department of Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:intecp:978-1-349-01989-2_14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.