IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/nbr/nberch/1480.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Production Functions in Manufacturing: Some Preliminary Results

In: The Theory and Empirical Analysis of Production

Author

Listed:
  • Zvi Griliches

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Zvi Griliches, 1967. "Production Functions in Manufacturing: Some Preliminary Results," NBER Chapters, in: The Theory and Empirical Analysis of Production, pages 275-340, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    • Handle: RePEc:nbr:nberch:1480
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c1480.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. C. E. Ferguson, 1965. "Time-Series Production Functions and Technological Progress in American Manufacturing Industry," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 73(2), pages 135-135.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rabeau, Yves, 1976. "La prévision de l’emploi dans le modèle de l’IRIC," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 52(2), pages 149-168, avril.
    2. Havranek, Tomas & Irsova, Zuzana & Gechert, Sebastian & Kolcunova, Dominika, 2019. "Death to the Cobb-Douglas Production Function? A Meta-Analysis of the Capital-Labor Substitution Elasticity," MetaArXiv 6um5g, Center for Open Science.
    3. Sebastian Gechert & Thomas Havranek & Zuzana Irsova & Dominika Kolcunova, 2019. "Death to the Cobb-Douglas Production Function," FMM Working Paper 51-2019, IMK at the Hans Boeckler Foundation, Macroeconomic Policy Institute.
    4. Michael Knoblach & Fabian Stöckl, 2020. "What Determines The Elasticity Of Substitution Between Capital And Labor? A Literature Review," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(4), pages 847-875, September.
    5. Abdullah, Maisom, 1989. "Capital-labor substitutability in Malaysian manufacturing: alternative estimates and policy implications," ISU General Staff Papers 198901010800009905, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    6. Brockmeier, Martina & Salamon, Petra & Kurzweil, Marianne & Herok, Claudia, 2003. "Food and Agricultural Markets at the Advent of the next WTO Round," Conference papers 331165, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    7. Gechert, Sebastian & Havranek, Tomas & Irsova, Zuzana & Kolcunova, Dominika, 2019. "Death to the Cobb-Douglas Production Function? A Quantitative Survey of the Capital-Labor Substitution Elasticity," EconStor Preprints 203136, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    8. Sebastian Gechert & Tomas Havranek & Zuzana Irsova & Dominika Kolcunova, 2022. "Measuring Capital-Labor Substitution: The Importance of Method Choices and Publication Bias," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 45, pages 55-82, July.
    9. Lücke, Matthias, 1992. "Technischer Fortschritt und die Arbeitsteilung zwischen Industrie- und Entwicklungsländern: eine empirische Analyse," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy 758, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    10. Lee, Jong-Ying, 1983. "Structural and Technological Changes in the Agricultural Sector of Taiwan, 1951-1976: A Time-Varying Paramater Approach," 1983 Occasional Paper Series No. 3 197277, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    11. Eriksson, Göran & Jakobsson, Ulf & Jansson, Leif, 1976. "Estimation and Analysis with a WDI Production Function," Working Paper Series 8, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
    12. Karamat Ali & Abdul Hamid, 1996. "Technical Change, Technical Efficiency, and Their Impact on Input Demand in the Agricultural and Manufacturing Sectors of Pakistan," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 35(3), pages 215-228.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberch:1480. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nberrus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.