IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/zbw/sfustu/250022.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Die Rolle der Betriebsvermögen in der Vermögensverteilung

Author

Listed:
  • Demary, Markus
  • Hentze, Tobias
  • Kauder, Björn
  • Niehues, Judith

Abstract

Große Vermögen sind stärker betrieblich gebunden als dies amtliche Statistiken und Erhebungen ausweisen. Das geht aus einer Studie der Stiftung Familienunternehmen hervor, die vom Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft (IW) erstellt worden ist. Die Forscher entwickelten einen Ansatz, um das Betriebsvermögen möglichst realitätsnah zu bewerten. Sie schätzen das von Privatleuten gehaltene Betriebsvermögen 2017 auf 2,4 bis 3,1 Billionen Euro. Das ergibt sich aus einer Stichprobe von knapp 4.500 Unternehmen in Kombination mit Befragungsdaten der Deutschen Bundesbank, die das IW ausgewertet hat.

Suggested Citation

  • Demary, Markus & Hentze, Tobias & Kauder, Björn & Niehues, Judith, 2021. "Die Rolle der Betriebsvermögen in der Vermögensverteilung," Studien, Stiftung Familienunternehmen / Foundation for Family Businesses, number 250022, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:sfustu:250022
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/250022/1/1775547779.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stefan Bach & Andreas Thiemann & Aline Zucco, 2015. "The Top Tail of the Wealth Distribution in Germany, France, Spain, and Greece," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1502, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    2. Bach, Stefan & Thiemann, Andreas & Zucco, Aline, 2019. "Looking for the missing rich: tracing the top tail of the wealth distribution," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 26(6), pages 1234-1258.
    3. Christian Westermeier & Markus M. Grabka, 2015. "Große statistische Unsicherheit beim Anteil der Top-Vermögenden in Deutschland," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 82(7), pages 123-133.
    4. Stefan Bach, 2020. "Vermögensabgabe DIE LINKE. Aufkommen und Verteilungswirkungen: Forschungsprojekt im Auftrag der Fraktion DIE LINKE. im Bundestag und der Rosa-Luxemburg-Stiftung," DIW Berlin: Politikberatung kompakt, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, volume 127, number pbk157, Enero-Abr.
    5. International Monetary Fund, 2019. "Germany: Selected Issues," IMF Staff Country Reports 2019/214, International Monetary Fund.
    6. William F. Sharpe, 1964. "Capital Asset Prices: A Theory Of Market Equilibrium Under Conditions Of Risk," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 19(3), pages 425-442, September.
    7. Philip Vermeulen, 2018. "How Fat is the Top Tail of the Wealth Distribution?," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 64(2), pages 357-387, June.
    8. Brügelmann, Ralph & Hentze, Tobias, 2015. "Unternehmensbewertung als Grundlage für die Besteuerung von Erbschaften und Schenkungen," IW policy papers 9/2015, Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft (IW) / German Economic Institute.
    9. Carsten Schröder & Charlotte Bartels & Konstantin Göbler & Markus M. Grabka & Johannes König & Rainer Siegers & Sabine Zinn, 2020. "Verbesserung der Forschungsdateninfrastruktur im Bereich Hochvermögender mit dem Sozio-oekonomischen Panel (SOEP)," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 1084, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Schularick, Moritz & Albers, Thilo & Bartels, Charlotte, 2022. "Wealth and its Distribution in Germany, 1895-2018," CEPR Discussion Papers 17269, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    2. Sofie R. Waltl & Robin Chakraborty, 2022. "Missing the wealthy in the HFCS: micro problems with macro implications," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 20(1), pages 169-203, March.
    3. Mathias Moser & Stefan Humer & Matthias Schnetzer, 2016. "Bequests and the accumulation of wealth in the Eurozone," Working Paper Reihe der AK Wien - Materialien zu Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft 149, Kammer für Arbeiter und Angestellte für Wien, Abteilung Wirtschaftswissenschaft und Statistik.
    4. Theine, Hendrik, 2019. "The media coverage of wealth and inheritance taxation in Germany," Department of Economics Working Paper Series 290, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    5. Wildauer, Rafael & Kapeller, Jakob, 2022. "Tracing the invisible rich: A new approach to modelling Pareto tails in survey data," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    6. Michał Brzeziński & Katarzyna Sałach, 2020. "Why wealth inequality differs between post-socialist countries?," Working Papers 2020-14, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.
    7. Judith Niehues & Maximilian Stockhausen & Andreas Peichl & Charlotte Bartels & Mario Bossler & Bernd Fitzenberger & Arnim Seidlitz & Moritz Kuhn & Till Baldenius & Sebastian Kohl & Moritz Schularick &, 2020. "Ungleichheit unter der Lupe – neue politische Antworten auf ein bekanntes Thema," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 73(02), pages 03-26, February.
    8. Späth Jochen & Schmid Kai Daniel, 2018. "The Distribution of Household Savings in Germany," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 238(1), pages 3-32, February.
    9. Bricker, Jesse & Hansen, Peter & Volz, Alice Henriques, 2019. "Wealth concentration in the U.S. after augmenting the upper tail of the survey of consumer finances," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    10. Carsten Schröder & Charlotte Bartels & Markus M. Grabka & Johannes König & Martin Kroh & Rainer Siegers, 2020. "A Novel Sampling Strategy for Surveying High Net‐Worth Individuals—A Pretest Application Using the Socio‐Economic Panel," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 66(4), pages 825-849, December.
    11. Azar, José, 2017. "Portfolio Diversification, Market Power, and the Theory of the Firm," IESE Research Papers D/1170, IESE Business School.
    12. Arthur B. Kennickell, 2019. "The tail that wags: differences in effective right tail coverage and estimates of wealth inequality," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 17(4), pages 443-459, December.
    13. Juha Honkkila & Ilja Kristian Kavonius, 2016. "Deriving household indebtedness indicators by linking micro and macro balance sheet data," IFC Bulletins chapters, in: Bank for International Settlements (ed.), Combining micro and macro data for financial stability analysis, volume 41, Bank for International Settlements.
    14. Sałach, Katarzyna & Brzeziński, Michał, 2022. "Political connections and the super-rich in Poland," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 46(4).
    15. Jakob Kapeller & Rafael Wildauer, 2019. "A Comment on Fitting Pareto Tails to Complex Survey Data," ICAE Working Papers 102, Johannes Kepler University, Institute for Comprehensive Analysis of the Economy.
    16. Enea Baselgia & Isabel Z. Martínez, 2022. "Behavioral Responses to Special Tax Regimes for the Super-Rich: Insights from Swiss Rich Lists," CESifo Working Paper Series 9778, CESifo.
    17. N. Denisa Naidin & Sofie R. Waltl & Michael H. Ziegelmeyer, 2022. "Objectified Housing Sales and Rent Prices in Representative Household Surveys: the Impact on Macroeconomic Statistics," BCL working papers 160, Central Bank of Luxembourg.
    18. Steiner, Viktor & Zhu, Junyi, 2021. "A joint top income and wealth distribution," Discussion Papers 2021/3, Free University Berlin, School of Business & Economics.
    19. Zhu, Junyi & Steiner, Viktor, 2020. "A Joint Top Income and Wealth Distribution," VfS Annual Conference 2020 (Virtual Conference): Gender Economics 224651, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    20. Michele Cantarella & Andrea Neri & Maria Giovanna Ranalli, 2021. "Mind the wealth gap: a new allocation method to match micro and macro statistics for household wealth," Papers 2101.01085, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2021.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:sfustu:250022. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.familienunternehmen.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.