IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/zbw/hbsedi/438.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Mitbestimmung von Mitarbeitenden aus DIY-Communities

Author

Listed:
  • Wolf, Patricia
  • Klotz, Ute
  • Gaudenz, Urs

Abstract

Der Trend zu Do-It-Yourself (DIY) und offenem Wissensaustausch in Online-Communities fordert etablierte Institutionen heraus. Auch in avancierten Bereichen der Forschung und Entwicklung gelingt es alternativen Projektgemeinschaften inzwischen, Technologien und Wissen kostengünstiger und effizienter weiterzuentwickeln als die Entwicklungsabteilungen traditioneller Unternehmen. Diese Studie stellt Mitglieder von DIY bzw. Open Biology Communities als potenzielle Mitarbeitende etablierter Unternehmen in den Mittelpunkt und zeigt, wie mit Hilfe einer guten Mediation eine erfolgreiche Kooperation zwischen diesen beiden ungleichen Gruppen möglich ist.

Suggested Citation

  • Wolf, Patricia & Klotz, Ute & Gaudenz, Urs, 2020. "Mitbestimmung von Mitarbeitenden aus DIY-Communities," Study / edition der Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf, volume 127, number 438.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:hbsedi:438
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/214162/1/1690471468.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Troxler, Peter & Wolf, Patricia, 2017. "Digital maker-entrepreneurs in open design: What activities make up their business model?," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 60(6), pages 807-817.
    2. Stoyan Tanev & Tony Bailetti & Steve Allen & Hristo Milyakov & Pavel Durchev & Petko Ruskov, 2011. "How do value co-creation activities relate to the perception of firms' innovativeness?," Journal of Innovation Economics, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(1), pages 131-159.
    3. Sebastian Spaeth & Piet Hausberg, 2016. "Can Open Source Hardware Disrupt Manufacturing Industries? The Role of Platforms and Trust in the Rise of 3D Printing," Progress in IS, in: Jan-Peter Ferdinand & Ulrich Petschow & Sascha Dickel (ed.), The Decentralized and Networked Future of Value Creation, pages 59-73, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Umair Baig & Batool Muhammad Hussain & Ieva Meidute-Kavaliauskiene & Sigitas Davidavicius, 2022. "Digital Entrepreneurship: Future Research Directions and Opportunities for New Business Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-16, April.
    2. María Jesús Ávila-Gutiérrez & Alejandro Martín-Gómez & Francisco Aguayo-González & Juan Ramón Lama-Ruiz, 2020. "Eco-Holonic 4.0 Circular Business Model to Conceptualize Sustainable Value Chain towards Digital Transition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-32, March.
    3. Reinauer, Tobias & Hansen, Ulrich Elmer, 2021. "Determinants of adoption in open-source hardware: A review of small wind turbines," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    4. Miao, Yumeng & Du, Rong & Ou, Carol, 2022. "Guanxi circles and light entrepreneurship in social commerce : The roles of mass entrepreneurship climate and technology affordances," Other publications TiSEM f19a203f-abb6-4835-9c34-2, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    5. Elia, Gianluca & Margherita, Alessandro & Passiante, Giuseppina, 2020. "Digital entrepreneurship ecosystem: How digital technologies and collective intelligence are reshaping the entrepreneurial process," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    6. Lehrer, Mark & Ordanini, Andrea & DeFillippi, Robert & Miozzo, Marcela, 2012. "Challenging the orthodoxy of value co-creation theory: A contingent view of co-production in design-intensive business services," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 499-509.
    7. Zaborek Piotr & Mazur Jolanta, 2017. "Exploring Links Between Engaging Customers in Value Co-Creation and Product Innovativeness," International Journal of Management and Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, vol. 53(3), pages 82-106, September.
    8. Rayna, Thierry & Striukova, Ludmila, 2021. "Assessing the effect of 3D printing technologies on entrepreneurship: An exploratory study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    9. Tabarés, Raúl & Kuittinen, Hanna, 2020. "A tale of two innovation cultures: Bridging the gap between makers and manufacturers," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    10. Hanna Saari & Maria Åkerman & Barbara Kieslinger & Jouko Myllyoja & Regina Sipos, 2021. "How Open Is the Maker Movement? Integrative Literature Review of the Openness Practices in the Global Maker Movement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-20, December.
    11. Erickson, Kristofer, 2018. "Can creative firms thrive without copyright? Value generation and capture from private-collective innovation," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 61(5), pages 699-709.
    12. Jérémy Bonvoisin & Robert Mies & Jean-François Boujut, 2021. "Seven observations and research questions about Open Design and Open Source Hardware," Post-Print hal-03395460, HAL.
    13. Petko Ruskov & Kaloyan Haralampiev & Lachesar Georgiev, 2012. "Online Investigation of SMEs Competitive Advantage," Proceedings- 10th International Conference on Mangement, Enterprise and Benchmarking (MEB 2012),, Óbuda University, Keleti Faculty of Business and Management.
    14. Sharma, Shikha & Conduit, Jodie & Rao Hill, Sally, 2014. "Organisational capabilities for customer participation in health care service innovation," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 179-188.
    15. Foroudi, Pantea & Nazarian, Alireza & Ziyadin, Sayabek & Kitchen, Philip & Hafeez, Khalid & Priporas, Costas & Pantano, Eleonora, 2020. "Co-creating brand image and reputation through stakeholder’s social network," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 42-59.
    16. Stanko, Michael A. & Allen, B.J., 2022. "Disentangling the collective motivations for user innovation in a 3D printing community," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    17. Tara Vinodrai & Brenton Nader & Christian Zavarella, 2021. "Manufacturing space for inclusive innovation? A study of makerspaces in southern Ontario," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 36(3), pages 205-223, May.
    18. Hinson, Robert E. & Osabutey, Ellis L.C. & Kosiba, John Paul, 2020. "Exploring the dialogic communication potential of selected African destinations' place websites," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 690-698.
    19. Vladimiras Dolgopolovas & Valentina Dagiene, 2021. "On the Future of Computational Thinking Education: Moving beyond the Digital Agenda, a Discourse Analysis Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-21, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:hbsedi:438. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/boeckde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.