IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/zbw/hbsedi/264.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Sicherung sozial-ökologischer Standards durch Partizipation: Das Beispiel nichtstaatlicher Akteure im internationalen Recht

Author

Listed:
  • Ekardt, Felix

Abstract

Die vorliegende Untersuchung fragt nach Chancen und Grenzen von Partizipation in all ihren Erscheinungsformen (Gesetzgebung, Verwaltung, Gerichte, Konsumentenhandeln, diverse informelle Partizipationsformen). Die Studie zielt neben einer allgemeinen Klärung jener Fragestellung insbesondere auf eine Analyse der verschiedenen eben genannten Partizipationsformen auf internationaler Ebene, da dieser Bereich (auch) in den Debatten seit Stuttgart 21 weitgehend unterrepräsentiert ist. Dabei kommen die Chancen von Partizipation in den Blick, aber auch vielfältige Probleme: etwa demokratische Legitimation, geringe Motivation zur Partizipation, Aporie von Offenheit und strategisch zwecks bestimmter Ziele gewünschter Partizipation, begrenzte Macht der Partizipierenden

Suggested Citation

  • Ekardt, Felix, 2012. "Sicherung sozial-ökologischer Standards durch Partizipation: Das Beispiel nichtstaatlicher Akteure im internationalen Recht," Study / edition der Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf, volume 127, number 264, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:hbsedi:264
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/116459/1/edition_hbs_264.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ekardt, Felix, 2010. "Soziale Gerechtigkeit in der Klimapolitik," Study / edition der Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf, volume 127, number 249, July.
    2. Victor Mosoti, 2006. "Africa in the First Decade of WTO Dispute Settlement," Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 9(2), pages 427-453, June.
    3. Esty, Daniel C, 1998. "Non-Governmental Organizations at the World Trade Organization: Cooperation, Competition, or Exclusion," Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 1(1), pages 123-147, March.
    4. Dunoff, Jeffrey L, 1998. "The Misguided Debate over NGO Participation at the WTO," Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 1(3), pages 433-456, September.
    5. Donald McRae, 2004. "What is the Future of WTO Dispute Settlement?," Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 7(1), pages 3-21, March.
    6. James Bacchus, 2004. "A Few Thoughts On Legitimacy, Democracy, And The Wto," Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 7(3), pages 667-673, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Keck, Alexander & Schropp, Simon, 2007. "Indisputably essential: The economics of dispute settlement institutions in trade agreements," WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2007-02, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
    2. Xiaolong Zou & Chuan Wang, 2021. "NGO’s Authority: A Discussion in the Global Environmental Governance," International Studies, , vol. 58(1), pages 80-97, January.
    3. Runge, C. Ford, 2001. "A Global Environment Organization (Geo) And The World Trading System: Prospects And Problems," Working Papers 14448, University of Minnesota, Center for International Food and Agricultural Policy.
    4. John B. Coles & Jing Zhang & Jun Zhuang, 2022. "Bridging the research-practice gap in disaster relief: using the IFRC Code of Conduct to develop an aid model," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 312(2), pages 1337-1357, May.
    5. Rezana Konomi & Dorina Gjipali & Ntastin Perola, 2023. "Effectiveness and legitimacy of Amicus Curiae submission before WTO judiciary organs," Academicus International Scientific Journal, Entrepreneurship Training Center Albania, issue 28, pages 110-120, July.
    6. Hannah Murphy & Aynsley Kellow, 2013. "Forum Shopping in Global Governance: Understanding States, Business and NGOs in Multiple Arenas," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 4(2), pages 139-149, May.
    7. Boza, Sofía & Fernández, Felipe, 2014. "Development level and WTO member participation in Specific Trade Concerns (STCs) and Disputes on SPS/TBT," Papers 946, World Trade Institute.
    8. Forere Malebakeng, 2013. "Revisiting African States Participation in the WTO Dispute Settlement through Intra-Africa RTA Dispute Settlement," The Law and Development Review, De Gruyter, vol. 6(2), pages 155-179, August.
    9. Boza, Sofia & Fernandez, Felipe, 2015. "Is it only suitable for a few? WTO member participation in Specific Trade Concerns and Disputes on SPS/TBT according to their income levels," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 211368, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    10. de Sépibus, Joëlle, 2012. "The UNFCCC at a Crossroads: Can Increased Involvement of Business and Industry Help Rescue the Multilateral Climate Regime?," Papers 429, World Trade Institute.
    11. Camille Parguel & Jean-Christophe Graz, 2021. "Food Can’t Be Traded: Civil Society’s Discursive Power in the Context of Agricultural Liberalisation in India," Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER) Working Paper 405, Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER), New Delhi, India.
    12. Eyal Benvenisti & George Downs, 2009. "Toward global checks and balances," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 366-387, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:hbsedi:264. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/boeckde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.