IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/zbw/fomkce/7.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Die Fachlaufbahn - Nutzen und Akzeptanz unter transaktionaler und agiler Führung in kleinen und mittelständischen Unternehmen

Editor

Listed:
  • FOM Hochschule für Oekonomie & Management, KCE KompetenzCentrum für Entrepreneurship & Mittelstand

Author

Listed:
  • Detering, Achim
  • Vatanparast, Mir Farid

Abstract

Die Fachlaufbahn steht dafür, Mitarbeitenden, die keine Führungsverantwortung übernehmen möchten und daher nicht für eine klassische Karriere in Frage kommen, trotzdem Anerkennung, Geld und Entwicklungsmöglichkeiten im Unternehmen zu geben. Damit wird die Fachkarriere zu einem attraktiven Merkmal eines Unternehmens und trägt zu seiner "Employer Brand" bei. Inwieweit hängt die Akzeptanz einer Fachlaufbahn von der Motivierbarkeit dieser Mitarbeitenden und den Führungsstilen der Vorgesetzten ab? Um diese Frage zu beleuchten, betrachtet dieser Beitrag das Motivationsmodell von Barbuto und Scholl mit seinen intrinsischen und extrinsischen Motivationsquellen und bringt es in Zusammenhang mit Forschungsergebnissen aus einem mittelständischen Software-Unternehmen, in dem eine Fachlaufbahn gleichzeitig in einer transaktional und einer agil geführten Abteilung eingeführt wurde. Dazu wurden durch Interviews mit Führungskräften die Akzeptanzfaktoren und Nutzenerwartungen bezüglich einer Fachlaufbahn herausgearbeitet und mit einer standardisierten Umfrage bei den Mitarbeitenden des erwähnten Unternehmens getestet. Die erwarteten Unterschiede in der Motivierbarkeit der Mitarbeitenden aus den beiden unterschiedlich geführten Abteilungen konnten dabei nur teilweise bestätigt werden, was Auswirkungen auf die Empfehlungen zur Einführung der Fachkarriere hat.

Suggested Citation

  • Detering, Achim & Vatanparast, Mir Farid, 2023. "Die Fachlaufbahn - Nutzen und Akzeptanz unter transaktionaler und agiler Führung in kleinen und mittelständischen Unternehmen," KCE Schriftenreihe, FOM Hochschule für Oekonomie & Management, KCE KompetenzCentrum für Entrepreneurship & Mittelstand, volume 7, number 7 edited by FOM Hochschule für Oekonomie & Management, KCE KompetenzCentrum für Entrepreneurship & Mittelstand.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:fomkce:7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/278839/1/1853399191.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fred D. Davis & Richard P. Bagozzi & Paul R. Warshaw, 1989. "User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(8), pages 982-1003, August.
    2. Agnieszka Rzepka & Andrzej J. Olak, 2018. "Innovation as an immanent attribute of an agile enterprise," Ekonomia i Prawo, Uniwersytet Mikolaja Kopernika, vol. 17(2), pages 211-221, June.
    3. Armin Trost, 2018. "Neue Personalstrategien zwischen Stabilität und Agilität," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-662-57407-2, December.
    4. Taylor, Frederick Winslow, 1911. "The Principles of Scientific Management," History of Economic Thought Books, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, number taylor1911.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christian Arnold & Kai-Ingo Voigt, 2019. "Determinants of Industrial Internet of Things Adoption in German Manufacturing Companies," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(06), pages 1-21, October.
    2. Philippe Cohard, 2020. "Information Systems Values: A Study of the Intranet in Three French Higher Education Institutions," Post-Print hal-02987225, HAL.
    3. Awni Rawashdeh, 2013. "Study Toward The Understanding Of Behavioral Intention To Use A Customer Relationship Management (Crm) Systems," Far East Journal of Psychology and Business, Far East Research Centre, vol. 12(1), pages 1-11, September.
    4. Alina Mirela Teacu (Parincu), 2019. "Neuromanagement – the Impact of Neuroscience on the Organizational Performance," Risk in Contemporary Economy, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, pages 487-493.
    5. Melih Engin & Fatih Gürses, 2019. "Adoption of Hospital Information Systems in Public Hospitals in Turkey: An Analysis with the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology Model," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(06), pages 1-19, October.
    6. Giada Baldessarelli & Nathalie Lazaric & Michele Pezzoni, 2022. "Organizational routines: Evolution in the research landscape of two core communities," Post-Print halshs-03718851, HAL.
    7. Hasan, Rajibul & Lowe, Ben & Petrovici, Dan, 2020. "Consumer adoption of pro-poor service innovations in subsistence marketplaces," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 461-475.
    8. Michel Anteby & Curtis K. Chan, 2018. "A Self-Fulfilling Cycle of Coercive Surveillance: Workers’ Invisibility Practices and Managerial Justification," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(2), pages 247-263, April.
    9. Morosan, Cristian, 2016. "An empirical examination of U.S. travelers’ intentions to use biometric e-gates in airports," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 120-128.
    10. Tsung Teng Chen, 2012. "The development and empirical study of a literature review aiding system," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 92(1), pages 105-116, July.
    11. Lawrence Bunnell & Kweku-Muata Osei-Bryson & Victoria Y. Yoon, 0. "RecSys Issues Ontology: A Knowledge Classification of Issues for Recommender Systems Researchers," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-42.
    12. David Vallat, 2015. "Une alternative au dualisme État-Marché : l’économie collaborative, questions pratiques et épistémologiques," Working Papers halshs-01249308, HAL.
    13. Issa Mohamed Al Dafaei & Zurida Ismail & Mohd Ali Samsudin & Firas Jalal Shakir, 2013. "The Mediating Effect of Self-Efficacy towards the Relationship Between Attitudes And Level of Use Towards Instructional Computer Technology in Oman," International Journal of Asian Social Science, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 3(12), pages 2382-2398, December.
    14. Abdesamad Zouine & Pierre Fenies, 2014. "The Critical Success Factors Of The ERP System Project: A Meta-Analysis Methodology," Post-Print hal-01419785, HAL.
    15. Debora Bettiga & Lucio Lamberti & Emanuele Lettieri, 2020. "Individuals’ adoption of smart technologies for preventive health care: a structural equation modeling approach," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 203-214, June.
    16. Mbassi, Christophe Martial & Messono, Omang Ombolo, 2023. "Historical technology and current economic development: Reassessing the nature of the relationship," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    17. Jeremy Atack & Robert A. Margo & Paul Rhode, 2020. "‘Mechanization Takes Command’: Inanimate Power and Labor Productivity in Late Nineteenth Century American Manufacturing," NBER Working Papers 27436, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    18. Luke Butcher & Ian Phau & Min Teah, 2016. "Brand prominence in luxury consumption: Will emotional value adjudicate our longing for status?," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(6), pages 701-715, November.
    19. Ahmed Ibrahim Alzahrani & T. Ramayah & Nalini Suppiah & Osama Alfarraj & Nasser Alalwan, 2020. "Modeling Blog Usage From a Developing Country Perspective Using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM)," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(3), pages 21582440209, July.
    20. Sudip Bhattacharjee & Lewis Shaw, 2001. "Evidence that independent research projects improve accounting students' technology-related perceptions and skills," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 83-103.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:fomkce:7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fommmde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.