IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/wfo/wstudy/47127.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

How Much Rural is the CAP? WWWforEurope Working Paper No. 51

Author

Listed:
  • Beatrice Camaioni
  • Roberto Esposti
  • Francesco Pagliacci
  • Franco Sotte

    (Università Politecnica delle Marche)

Abstract

In this task, research is mostly finalised to analyse how EU policies have been distributed across space. Here, the main focus is on Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) expenditure. The same territorial detail adopted in previous tasks is used (i.e., NUTS 3 level). By analysing CAP expenditure at such a territorial disaggregation level, this work has specifically concentrated on rural, agricultural and environmental policies. Actually, specific CAP measures are directly aimed at tackling those issues. CAP also accounts for a large share of overall EU funds, and it represents one of major drivers of EU spatial development. The methodology of analysis is based on the reconstruction of allocation of EU funds across EU 27 NUTS 3 regions. First, an exploratory analysis of the spatial allocation of CAP expenditure across Europe is assessed. Spatial allocation of CAP expenditure is considered by disentangling specific measures as well (e.g., Pillar One and Pillar Two expenditure, Direct Payment and Market Intervention Measures, Pillar Two's Axes, etc.). Both absolute expenditure levels and expenditure intensity are computed here. Then, through a simple statistical analysis, the correlation between CAP expenditure at NUTS 3 level and regional features, in terms of both rurality and agricultural activity, is assessed.

Suggested Citation

  • Beatrice Camaioni & Roberto Esposti & Francesco Pagliacci & Franco Sotte, 2014. "How Much Rural is the CAP? WWWforEurope Working Paper No. 51," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 47127, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:wfo:wstudy:47127
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.wifo.ac.at/wwa/pubid/47127
    File Function: abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roberto Esposti & Franco Sotte, 2002. "Institutional Structure, Industrialization and Rural Development: An Evolutionary Interpretation of the Italian Experience," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(1), pages 3-41.
    2. Riccardo Crescenzi & Fabrizio De Filippis & Fabio Pierangeli, 2015. "In Tandem for Cohesion? Synergies and Conflicts between Regional and Agricultural Policies of the European Union," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(4), pages 681-704, April.
    3. Paola Bertolini & Marco Montanari, 2009. "Un approccio territoriale al tema della povertà in Europa: dimensione rurale e urbana," Economia & lavoro, Carocci editore, issue 1, pages 1-27.
    4. Esposti, R. & Pagliacci, F. & Sotte, F. & Camaioni, Beatrice & Lobianco, A., 2013. "How rural the EU RDP is? An analysis through spatial funds allocation," 2013 Second Congress, June 6-7, 2013, Parma, Italy 149900, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA).
    5. Beatrice Camaioni & Roberto Esposti & Antonello Lobianco & Francesco Pagliacci & Franco Sotte, 2013. "Looking for PeripheRurality. WWWforEurope Working Paper No. 35," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 46921, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Karl Aiginger, 2016. "New Dynamics for Europe: Reaping the Benefits of Socio-ecological Transition – Part I: Synthesis. WWWforEurope Deliverable No. 11," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 58791, April.
    2. Ewa Kiryluk-Dryjska & Barbara Więckowska & Kinga Smolińska, 2022. "Winners and Losers of the CAP’s Rural Development Policy in Poland," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-15, May.
    3. Michael Böheim & Anna Strauss & Teresa Weiss, 2015. "Moving Towards a New Growth Model – Policy Options. WWWforEurope Deliverable No. 10," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 58556, April.
    4. Harald Badinger & David Bailey & Lisa de Propris & Peter Huber & Jürgen Janger & Kurt Kratena & Hans Pitlik & Thomas Sauer & Renaud Thillaye & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh, 2016. "New Dynamics for Europe: Reaping the Benefits of Socio-ecological Transition – Part II: Model and Area Chapters. WWWforEurope Deliverable No. 12," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 58792, February.
    5. Andrea Bonfiglio & Roberto Esposti & Francesco Pagliacci & Franco Sotte & Beatrice Camaioni, 2014. "Regional Perspectives and Distributional Effects of European Regional Policies. WWWforEurope Working Paper No. 66," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 47499, February.
    6. Stephanie Barnebeck & Yannick Kalff, 2015. "Urban Agenda and Urban Sustainability Strategies. Taking Stock of Policy Implementation and Policy Discussion. WWWforEurope Working Paper No. 103," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 58261, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Beatrice CAMAIONI & Roberto ESPOSTI & Francesco PAGLIACCI & Franco SOTTE, 2014. "How does space affect the allocation of the EU rural development policy's expenditure? An econometric assessment," Working Papers 399, Universita' Politecnica delle Marche (I), Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali.
    2. Camaioni, Beatrice & Esposti, Roberto & Lobianco, Antonello & Pagliacci, Francesco & Sotte, Franco, 2013. "How rural is the EU RDP? An analysis through spatial fund allocation," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 2(3), pages 1-24, December.
    3. Camaioni, Beatrice & Esposti, R. & Lobianco, A. & Pagliacci, F. & Sotte, F., 2013. "How does space affect the distribution of the EU RDP funds? An econometric assessment," 2013 Second Congress, June 6-7, 2013, Parma, Italy 151598, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA).
    4. Ewa Kiryluk-Dryjska & Barbara Więckowska & Kinga Smolińska, 2022. "Winners and Losers of the CAP’s Rural Development Policy in Poland," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-15, May.
    5. Francesco Pagliacci, 2017. "Measuring EU Urban-Rural Continuum Through Fuzzy Logic," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 108(2), pages 157-174, April.
    6. Ewa Kiryluk-Dryjska & Agnieszka Baer-Nawrocka, 2021. "Regional Differences in Benefits from the EU Common Agricultural Policy in Poland and Their Policy Implications," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-14, March.
    7. Novosák Jiří & Hájek Oldřich & Novosáková Jana & Koleňák Jiří, 2018. "Spatial Dimension of Czech Enterprise Support Policy: Where are Public Expenditures Allocated?," Review of Economic Perspectives, Sciendo, vol. 18(4), pages 333-351, December.
    8. Elena Calegari & Enrico Fabrizi & Gianni Guastella & Francesco Timpano, 2021. "EU regional convergence in the agricultural sector: Are there synergies between agricultural and regional policies?," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 100(1), pages 23-50, February.
    9. Camaioni, Beatrice & Esposti, Roberto & Pagliacci, Francesco & Sotte, Franco, 2014. "One policy, many policies: the spatial allocation of first and second pillar CAP Expenditure," 2014 Third Congress, June 25-27, 2014, Alghero, Italy 173088, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA).
    10. Novosák Jiří & Novosáková Jana & Hájek Oldřich & Horváth Peter, 2017. "Regional disparities, absorption capacity and Structural Fund payments: A case study of the Czech Republic," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 36(4), pages 81-92, December.
    11. Ewa Kiryluk-Dryjska & Barbara Więckowska, 2020. "Territorial Clusters of Farmers’ Interest in Diversification in Poland: Geospatial Location and Characteristics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-15, June.
    12. Mercedes Rodríguez & José Antonio Camacho, 2023. "The importance of agriculture and rural areas for the future in the European Union: An exploration of public opinion," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 69(10), pages 394-403.
    13. Elias Giannakis & Sophia Efstratoglou & Artemis Antoniades, 2018. "Off-Farm Employment and Economic Crisis: Evidence from Cyprus," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-11, March.
    14. Manevska-Tasevska, Gordana & Hansson, Helena & Asmild, Mette & Surry, Yves, 2018. "Assessing the regional efficiency of Swedish agriculture under the CAP ‒ a multidirectional efficiency approach," 162nd Seminar, April 26-27, 2018, Budapest, Hungary 271971, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    15. Paola Bertolini & Francesco Pagliacci, 2016. "Territorial Unbalances in Quality of Life. A focus on Italian Inner and Rural Areas," Department of Economics 0087, University of Modena and Reggio E., Faculty of Economics "Marco Biagi".
    16. Paola Bertolini & Francesco Pagliacci, 2016. "Territorial Unbalances in Quality of Life. A focus on Italian Inner and Rural Areas," Center for the Analysis of Public Policies (CAPP) 0140, Universita di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Dipartimento di Economia "Marco Biagi".
    17. Mercedes Rodríguez & José Antonio Camacho, . "The importance of agriculture and rural areas for the future in the European Union: An exploration of public opinion," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 0.
    18. Pierangeli, Fabio & Ruscio, Luca, 2015. "Impact of direct payments convergence in Italy: a territorial and sector assessment," 147th Seminar, October 7-8, 2015, Sofia, Bulgaria 212240, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    19. A. Bonfiglio & B. Camaioni & S. Coderoni & R. Esposti & F. Pagliacci & F. Sotte, 2016. "Where does EU money eventually go? The distribution of CAP expenditure across the European space," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 43(4), pages 693-727, November.
    20. Riccardo Crescenzi & Mara Giua, 2016. "The EU Cohesion Policy in context: Does a bottom-up approach work in all regions?," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 48(11), pages 2340-2357, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wfo:wstudy:47127. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Florian Mayr (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wifooat.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.