IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/uts/finphd/5-2015.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Regression and Convex Switching System Methods for Stochastic Control Problems with Applications to Multiple-Exercise Options

Author

Listed:
  • Nicholas Andrew Yap Swee Guan

Abstract

In this thesis, we develop several new simulation-based algorithms for solving some important classes of optimal stochastic control problems. In particular, these methods are aimed at providing good approximate solutions to problems that involve a high-dimensional underlying processes. These algorithms are of the primal-dual kind and therefore provide a gauge of the distance to optimality of the given approximate solutions to the optimal one. These methods will be used in the pricing of the multiple-exercise option. In Chapter 1, we conduct a review of the literature that is relevant to the pricing of the multiple-exercise option and the primal and dual methods that we will be developing in this thesis. In the next two chapters of the thesis, we focus on regression-based dual methods for optimal multiple stopping problems in probability theory. In particular, we concentrate on finding upper bounds on the price of the multiple-exercise option as it sits within this framework. In Chapter 2, we derive an additive dual for the multiple-exercise options using financial arguments, and see that this approach leads to the construction of an algorithm that has greater computational efficiency than other methods in the literature. In Chapter 3, we derive the first known dual of the multiplicative kind for the multiple-exercise option and devise a tractable algorithm to compute it. In the penultimate chapter of the thesis, we focus on a new class of algorithms that are based on what is known as convex switching system. These algorithms provide approximate solutions to the more general class of optimal stochastic switching problems. In Chapter 4, techniques based on combinations of rigorous theory and heuristics arguments are used to improve the efficiency and applicability of the method. We then devise algorithms of the primal-dual kind to assess the accuracy of this approach. Chapter 5 concludes.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicholas Andrew Yap Swee Guan, 2015. "Regression and Convex Switching System Methods for Stochastic Control Problems with Applications to Multiple-Exercise Options," PhD Thesis, Finance Discipline Group, UTS Business School, University of Technology, Sydney, number 5-2015.
  • Handle: RePEc:uts:finphd:5-2015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://opus.lib.uts.edu.au/bitstream/10453/39183/2/02whole.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carriere, Jacques F., 1996. "Valuation of the early-exercise price for options using simulations and nonparametric regression," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 19-30, December.
    2. Nan Chen & Paul Glasserman, 2007. "Additive and multiplicative duals for American option pricing," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 11(2), pages 153-179, April.
    3. Mark S. Joshi, 2007. "A Simple Derivation of and Improvements to Jamshidian's and Rogers' Upper Bound Methods for Bermudan Options," Applied Mathematical Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(3), pages 197-205.
    4. John Schoenmakers, 2012. "A pure martingale dual for multiple stopping," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 319-334, April.
    5. Leif Andersen & Mark Broadie, 2004. "Primal-Dual Simulation Algorithm for Pricing Multidimensional American Options," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(9), pages 1222-1234, September.
    6. Longstaff, Francis A & Schwartz, Eduardo S, 2001. "Valuing American Options by Simulation: A Simple Least-Squares Approach," Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 14(1), pages 113-147.
    7. Beveridge, Christopher & Joshi, Mark & Tang, Robert, 2013. "Practical policy iteration: Generic methods for obtaining rapid and tight bounds for Bermudan exotic derivatives using Monte Carlo simulation," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 37(7), pages 1342-1361.
    8. Philip Protter & Emmanuelle Clément & Damien Lamberton, 2002. "An analysis of a least squares regression method for American option pricing," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 6(4), pages 449-471.
    9. Joshi, Mark & Tang, Robert, 2014. "Effective sub-simulation-free upper bounds for the Monte Carlo pricing of callable derivatives and various improvements to existing methodologies," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 25-45.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nicholas Andrew Yap Swee Guan, 2015. "Regression and Convex Switching System Methods for Stochastic Control Problems with Applications to Multiple-Exercise Options," PhD Thesis, Finance Discipline Group, UTS Business School, University of Technology, Sydney, number 26, July-Dece.
    2. Mark S. Joshi, 2016. "Analysing the bias in the primal-dual upper bound method for early exercisable derivatives: bounds, estimation and removal," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(4), pages 519-533, April.
    3. David A. Goldberg & Yilun Chen, 2018. "Beating the curse of dimensionality in options pricing and optimal stopping," Papers 1807.02227, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2018.
    4. Christopher Beveridge & Mark Joshi, 2011. "Monte Carlo Bounds for Game Options Including Convertible Bonds," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(5), pages 960-974, May.
    5. Denis Belomestny & Grigori Milstein & Vladimir Spokoiny, 2009. "Regression methods in pricing American and Bermudan options using consumption processes," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(3), pages 315-327.
    6. Louis Bhim & Reiichiro Kawai, 2018. "Smooth Upper Bounds For The Price Function Of American Style Options," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(01), pages 1-38, February.
    7. Vijay V. Desai & Vivek F. Farias & Ciamac C. Moallemi, 2012. "Pathwise Optimization for Optimal Stopping Problems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(12), pages 2292-2308, December.
    8. Jérôme Lelong, 2019. "Pricing path-dependent Bermudan options using Wiener chaos expansion: an embarrassingly parallel approach," Working Papers hal-01983115, HAL.
    9. Bradley Sturt, 2021. "A nonparametric algorithm for optimal stopping based on robust optimization," Papers 2103.03300, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2023.
    10. Burcu Aydoğan & Ümit Aksoy & Ömür Uğur, 2018. "On the methods of pricing American options: case study," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 260(1), pages 79-94, January.
    11. Mark Broadie & Menghui Cao, 2008. "Improved lower and upper bound algorithms for pricing American options by simulation," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(8), pages 845-861.
    12. Wei, Wei & Zhu, Dan, 2022. "Generic improvements to least squares monte carlo methods with applications to optimal stopping problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(3), pages 1132-1144.
    13. J'er^ome Lelong, 2019. "Pricing path-dependent Bermudan options using Wiener chaos expansion: an embarrassingly parallel approach," Papers 1901.05672, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2020.
    14. Roger J. A. Laeven & John G. M. Schoenmakers & Nikolaus F. F. Schweizer & Mitja Stadje, 2020. "Robust Multiple Stopping -- A Pathwise Duality Approach," Papers 2006.01802, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2021.
    15. Chen Liu & Henry Schellhorn & Qidi Peng, 2019. "American Option Pricing With Regression: Convergence Analysis," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(08), pages 1-31, December.
    16. Denis Belomestny & Christian Bender & John Schoenmakers, 2009. "True Upper Bounds For Bermudan Products Via Non‐Nested Monte Carlo," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(1), pages 53-71, January.
    17. Zineb El Filali Ech-Chafiq & Pierre Henry Labordère & Jérôme Lelong, 2023. "Pricing Bermudan options using regression trees/random forests," Post-Print hal-03436046, HAL.
    18. Maximilian Mair & Jan Maruhn, 2013. "On the primal-dual algorithm for callable Bermudan options," Review of Derivatives Research, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 79-110, April.
    19. Maciej Klimek & Marcin Pitera, 2014. "The least squares method for option pricing revisited," Papers 1404.7438, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2015.
    20. Joshi, Mark & Tang, Robert, 2014. "Effective sub-simulation-free upper bounds for the Monte Carlo pricing of callable derivatives and various improvements to existing methodologies," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 25-45.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uts:finphd:5-2015. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Duncan Ford (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sfutsau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.