IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/iie/piiebs/piieb15-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Toward a US-China Investment Treaty

Author

Listed:
  • C. Fred Bergsten

    (Peterson Institute for International Economics)

  • Cathleen Cimino

    (Peterson Institute for International Economics)

  • Gary Clyde Hufbauer

    (Peterson Institute for International Economics)

  • J. Bradford Jensen

    (Peterson Institute for International Economics)

  • Sean Miner

    (Peterson Institute for International Economics)

  • Theodore H. Moran

    (Peterson Institute for International Economics)

  • Jeffrey J. Schott

    (Peterson Institute for International Economics)

Abstract

The United States and China are among the world's largest trading nations. They serve as the destination and source of the world's largest flows of foreign direct investment, and they participate in regional economic arrangements on trade and investment in the Asia-Pacific region and other parts of the world. Yet when it comes to direct investment in each other's economies, China and the United States are among the world's underperformers. The successful conclusion of the negotiation of a US-China bilateral investment treaty (BIT) could change this situation. In this PIIE Briefing, experts examine prospects for a US-China BIT now that negotiations have revived after a hiatus following the 2008 election of President Barack Obama, whose economic team had other economic priorities upon taking office. After spending its first years holding internal debates about trade deals, the administration completed an internal US government review of investment issues in 2012 and resumed talks with China in 2013. The essays in this study focus on recent developments that could inform and possibly set precedents for the investment pact. They also examine issues that pose challenges to a successful negotiation. Jeffrey J. Schott and Cathleen Cimino analyze the recent China-Japan-Korea investment pact and compare it with investment provisions that the United States has developed in its model BIT. Sean Miner and Gary Clyde Hufbauer discuss how a US-China BIT should address US concerns in China regarding subsidies, unfair advantages for state-owned enterprises, and uneven application of competition policy. J. Bradford Jensen analyzes the potential for increased trade in business services. Hufbauer, Miner, and Theodore H. Moran analyze review procedures of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS). In a concluding overview, C. Fred Bergsten assesses the broader context of US-China economic relations.

Suggested Citation

  • C. Fred Bergsten & Cathleen Cimino & Gary Clyde Hufbauer & J. Bradford Jensen & Sean Miner & Theodore H. Moran & Jeffrey J. Schott, . "Toward a US-China Investment Treaty," PIIE Briefings, Peterson Institute for International Economics, number PIIEB15-1, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:iie:piiebs:piieb15-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.piie.com/publications/piie-briefings/toward-us-china-investment-treaty
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Theodore H. Moran & Lindsay Oldenski, 2013. "Foreign Direct Investment in the United States: Benefits, Suspicions, and Risks with Special Attention to FDI from China," Peterson Institute Press: All Books, Peterson Institute for International Economics, number 6604, October.
    2. Theodore H. Moran, 2009. "Three Threats: An Analytical Framework for the CFIUS Process," Peterson Institute Press: All Books, Peterson Institute for International Economics, number 4297, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Miaojie Yu, 2020. "China-US Trade War and Trade Talk," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-981-15-3785-1, September.
    2. Theodore H. Moran, 2015. "Chinese Investment and CFIUS: Time for an Updated (and Revised) Perspective," Policy Briefs PB15-17, Peterson Institute for International Economics.
    3. Hamanaka, Shintaro, 2016. "Dynamics of investment negotiations between China and Japan : the China-Japan-Korea trilateral investment treaty and beyond," IDE Discussion Papers 613, Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization(JETRO).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Theodore H. Moran, 2015. "Chinese Investment and CFIUS: Time for an Updated (and Revised) Perspective," Policy Briefs PB15-17, Peterson Institute for International Economics.
    2. Keyan Lai, 2021. "National security and FDI policy ambiguity: A commentary," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(4), pages 496-505, December.
    3. Theodore H. Moran, 2013. "Dealing with Cybersecurity Threats Posed by Globalized Information Technology Suppliers," Policy Briefs PB13-11, Peterson Institute for International Economics.
    4. Theodore H. Moran, 2014. "Foreign Investment and Supply Chains in Emerging Markets: Recurring Problems and Demonstrated Solutions," Working Paper Series WP14-12, Peterson Institute for International Economics.
    5. Miroslav N. Jovanovic, 2011. "Globalisation: An Anatomy," Chapters, in: Miroslav N. Jovanović (ed.), International Handbook on the Economics of Integration, Volume I, chapter 11, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    6. David Godsell & Ugur Lel & Darius Miller, 2023. "U.S. national security and de-globalization," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 54(8), pages 1471-1494, October.
    7. Youngho Kang & Unjung Whang, 2018. "To Whom Does Outward FDI Give Jobs?," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 613-639, July.
    8. Theodore H. Moran, 2015. "The Role of Industrial Policy as a Development Tool: New Evidence from the Globalization of Trade-and-Investment," Policy Papers 71, Center for Global Development.
    9. Matthew J. Baltz, 2017. "Institutionalizing neoliberalism: CFIUS and the governance of inward foreign direct investment in the United States since 1975," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(5), pages 859-880, September.
    10. Haiyan Zhang & Daniel Bulcke, 2014. "China’s direct investment in the European Union: a new regulatory challenge?," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 159-177, March.
    11. Moran, Theodore H. & Görg, Holger & Seric, Adnan & Krieger-Boden, Christiane, 2017. "How to Attract Quality FDI?," KCG Policy Papers 2, Kiel Centre for Globalization (KCG).
    12. David Kemme, 2012. "Soverign Wealth Fund Issues and the National Fund(s) of Kazakhstan," William Davidson Institute Working Papers Series wp1036, William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan.
    13. Cheche Duan & Yicheng Zhou & Dehong Shen & Shengqiao Lin & Wei Gong & József Popp & Judit Oláh, 2021. "The Misunderstanding of China’s Investment, and a Clarification: “Faustian Bargain” or “Good Bargain”? On the OFDI Data of Central and Eastern Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-25, September.
    14. Sophie Meunier & Brian Burgoon & Wade Jacoby, 2014. "The politics of hosting Chinese investment in Europe—an introduction," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 109-126, March.
    15. Moran, Theodore H. & Görg, Holger & Seric, Adnan, 2016. "Quality FDI and Supply-Chains in Manufacturing: Overcoming Obstacles and Supporting Development," KCG Policy Papers 1, Kiel Centre for Globalization (KCG).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iie:piiebs:piieb15-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peterson Institute webmaster (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iieeeus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.