IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/jet/dpaper/dpaper613.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Dynamics of investment negotiations between China and Japan : the China-Japan-Korea trilateral investment treaty and beyond

Author

Listed:
  • Hamanaka, Shintaro

Abstract

The investment agreement relationship between China and Japan is complex. The many intersecting and overlapping agreements can rightly be described as a "noodle bowl of agreements." The 1989 bilateral investment treaty (BIT) between China and Japan still stands. Japan can also free-ride on the negotiation outcome of China's BITs and free trade agreements (FTAs) with other countries by using the most-favored-nation (MFN) provision in the 1989 China-Japan BIT, which does not contain regional economic integration organization (REIO) exception rules. However, because the China-Japan BIT does not have investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS), it may face implementation problems. The China-Japan-Korea trilateral investment treaty (CJK TIT), in force since 2014, made improvements upon the 1989 BIT, but Japan is not entirely satisfied with the outcome. For Japan, pre-establishment national treatment (NT) and prohibition of various types of performance requirements are the most important negotiation items, but the CJK TIT insufficiently addressed those problems. Moreover, because the CJK TIT has MFN provisions with an REIO exception rule, better access to investment markets brought about by future FTAs such as the China-Korea FTA and the EU-China FTA cannot be imported into CJK TIT. Hence, in the long run, Japan needs to pursue an FTA investment chapter with China that covers both MFN and ISDS.

Suggested Citation

  • Hamanaka, Shintaro, 2016. "Dynamics of investment negotiations between China and Japan : the China-Japan-Korea trilateral investment treaty and beyond," IDE Discussion Papers 613, Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization(JETRO).
  • Handle: RePEc:jet:dpaper:dpaper613
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ir.ide.go.jp/?action=repository_action_common_download&item_id=37573&item_no=1&attribute_id=22&file_no=1
    File Function: First version, 2016
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hamanaka, Shintaro, 2014. "TPP versus RCEP: Control of Membership and Agenda Setting," East Asian Economic Review, Korea Institute for International Economic Policy, vol. 18(2), pages 163-186, June.
    2. Chaisse, Julien & Hamanaka, Shintaro, 2014. "The Investment Version of the Asian Noodle Bowl: The Proliferation of International Investment Agreements," Working Papers on Regional Economic Integration 128, Asian Development Bank.
    3. C. Fred Bergsten & Cathleen Cimino & Gary Clyde Hufbauer & J. Bradford Jensen & Sean Miner & Theodore H. Moran & Jeffrey J. Schott, . "Toward a US-China Investment Treaty," PIIE Briefings, Peterson Institute for International Economics, number PIIEB15-1, October.
    4. Berger, Axel, 2013. "Investment rules in Chinese preferential trade and investment agreements: is China following the global trend towards comprehensive agreements?," IDOS Discussion Papers 7/2013, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    5. Berger, Axel, 2008. "China and the global governance of foreign direct investment," IDOS Discussion Papers 10/2008, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Melkikh, A.V. & Beregov, R.Y. & Sutormina, M.I., 2022. "Strange attractors and nontrivial solutions in games with three players," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nunnenkamp Peter, 2016. "Demokratie und internationale Investitionsabkommen: (Überraschende) Zusammenhänge und (lückenhafte) Erklärungen," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, De Gruyter, vol. 17(4), pages 364-382, December.
    2. Müller-Kraenner, Sascha, 2008. "China's and India's emerging energy foreign policy," IDOS Discussion Papers 15/2008, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    3. Chaisse Julien & Pomfret Richard, 2019. "The RCEP and the Changing Landscape of World Trade: Assessing Asia-Pacific Investment Regionalism Next Stage," The Law and Development Review, De Gruyter, vol. 12(1), pages 159-190, January.
    4. Hamanaka, Shintaro, 2018. "Theorizing regional group formation : anatomy of regional institutions from a membership perspective," IDE Discussion Papers 683, Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization(JETRO).
    5. Schmitz, Hubert (Ed.) & Messner, Dirk (Ed.), 2008. "Poor and powerful - the rise of China and India and the implications for Europe," IDOS Discussion Papers 13/2008, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    6. World Bank & the People’s Republic of China Development Research Center of the State Council, 2013. "China 2030 : Building a Modern, Harmonious, and Creative Society," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 12925, December.
    7. Theodore H. Moran, 2015. "Chinese Investment and CFIUS: Time for an Updated (and Revised) Perspective," Policy Briefs PB15-17, Peterson Institute for International Economics.
    8. Miaojie Yu, 2020. "China-US Trade War and Trade Talk," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-981-15-3785-1, December.
    9. Jeffrey J. Schott & Cathleen Cimino, 2014. "Should Korea Join the Trans-Pacific Partnership?," Policy Briefs PB14-22, Peterson Institute for International Economics.
    10. Margarida Miguel Costeira e Pereira & Helena Guilhermina da Silva Marques Nogueira, 2022. "Testing a Methodologic Approach to Territory Categorization Using Census Data," European Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 7, January -.
    11. Ka Zeng & Yue Lu, 2016. "Variation in Bilateral Investment Treaty Provisions and Foreign Direct Investment Flows to China, 1997--2011," International Interactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(5), pages 820-848, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    International agreements; Foreign investments; Bilateral investment treaty (BIT); China-Japan-Korea Trilateral Investment Treaty (CJK TIT); US-China BIT; Most-favored nation (MFN);
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F15 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Economic Integration
    • F53 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - International Agreements and Observance; International Organizations
    • F55 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - International Institutional Arrangements

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jet:dpaper:dpaper613. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Michitaka Imamitsu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/idegvjp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.