IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/ext/admone/51.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Gerencia de la innovación empresarial

Author

Listed:
  • Alejandro Boada Ortiz
  • Monia Colin Salgado
  • Noe Velasquez Espinosa

Abstract

La innovación tiene muchas miradas y es un proceso complejo para las organizaciones. No es simplemente tratar de hacer nuevos productos y servicios para aumentar las ventas. Tiene que ver, en primera instancia, con la creatividad y la concepción de las ideas, pero las ideas por sí mismas no sirven, ahora hay que llevarlas a la realidad; sin embargo, para esto, en una empresa, deben pasar por todas las áreas de la misma, ya que esta idea debe ser, ante todo: original. útil. apropiada y viable para el momento y la estrategia que se persigue. Con una idea de las características anteriores es necesario entonces construir productos, procesos y servicios con modelos de negocios que garanticen que el resultado sea altamente rentable, de baja imitabilidad, diferenciador y que genere competitividad. Como se puede ver, no es labor de una sola persona, es un esfuerzo organizacional; así, las diferentes miradas y aportes a este trabajo las encontramos en este libro, en el que participaron todos los profesores, quienes han contribuido a lo largo de más de 20 promociones en el programa de Maestría en Gerencia de la Innovación Empresarial y de otras tantas del programa de Especialización en Innovación y Desarrollo de Negocios de la Facultad de Administración de Empresas de la Universidad Externado de Colombia; profesores que con su reflexión, investigación y labor educativa han contribuido a formar, conjuntamente en ambos programas, a más de 600 egresados.

Suggested Citation

  • Alejandro Boada Ortiz & Monia Colin Salgado & Noe Velasquez Espinosa, 2019. "Gerencia de la innovación empresarial," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Administración de Empresas, number 51, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:ext:admone:51
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://publicaciones.uexternado.edu.co
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Giovanni Dosi & Sébastien Lechevalier & Angelo Secchi, 2010. "Interfirm heterogeneity: nature, sources and consequences for industrial dynamics. An introduction," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-00642680, HAL.
    2. Giovanni Dosi & Luigi Marengo, 2007. "On the Convergence of Evolutionary and Behavioral Theories of Organizations: A Tentative Roadmap," LEM Papers Series 2007/01, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    3. Lall, Sanjaya, 1992. "Technological capabilities and industrialization," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 165-186, February.
    4. Brown, Flor & Domínguez Villalobos, Lilia, 2004. "Medición de las capacidades tecnológicas en la industria mexicana," Revista CEPAL, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), August.
    5. Nooteboom, B. & Stam, E., 2008. "Microfoundations for Innovation Policy," Other publications TiSEM 1d729f59-d1dd-4beb-a69d-f, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    6. Robledo V, Jorge & López G, Cristina & Zapata L, Willmar & Pérez V, Juan David, 2010. "Desarrollo de una Metodología de Evaluación de Capacidades de Innovación," Perfil de Coyuntura Económica, Universidad de Antioquia, CIE, July.
    7. Giovanni Dosi & Sébastien Lechevalier & Angelo Secchi, 2010. "Introduction: Interfirm heterogeneity--nature, sources and consequences for industrial dynamics," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 19(6), pages 1867-1890, December.
    8. Richard R. Nelson, 1995. "Why should managers be thinking about technology policy?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(8), pages 581-588.
    9. David J. Teece & Gary Pisano & Amy Shuen, 1997. "Dynamic capabilities and strategic management," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(7), pages 509-533, August.
    10. Villavicencio, Daniel & Arvanitis, Rigas, 1994. "Transferencia de tecnología y aprendizaje tecnológico. Reflexiones basadas en trabajos empíricos," El Trimestre Económico, Fondo de Cultura Económica, vol. 61(242), pages 257-279, abril-jun.
    11. Bengt-Akel Lundvall, 1999. "La base del conocimiento y su producción," EKONOMIAZ. Revista vasca de Economía, Gobierno Vasco / Eusko Jaurlaritza / Basque Government, vol. 45(03), pages 14-37.
    12. Peter J. Lane & Michael Lubatkin, 1998. "Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning," Post-Print hal-02311860, HAL.
    13. Carolina Castaldi & Giovanni Dosi, 2009. "Cambio tecnológico y crecimiento económico: Algunas lecciones de pautas seculares y algunas conjeturas sobre el impacto actual de las TIC," Economía: teoría y práctica, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, México, vol. 0(1), pages 81-129, Noviembre.
    14. Carolina Castaldi & Giovanni Dosi, 2009. "Cambio tecnológico y crecimiento económico: Algunas lecciones de pautas seculares y algunas conjeturas sobre el impacto actual de las TIC," Economía: teoría y práctica, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, México, vol. 0(1), pages 81-129, Noviembre.
    15. Lundvall, Bengt-Ake & Johnson, Bjorn & Andersen, Esben Sloth & Dalum, Bent, 2002. "National systems of production, innovation and competence building," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 213-231, February.
    16. Richard Nelson & Sidney Winter, 2000. "En busca de una teoría útil de la innovación," Revista Cuadernos de Economia, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, FCE, CID, June.
    17. Giovanni Dosi & Luigi Marengo, 2007. "Perspective---On the Evolutionary and Behavioral Theories of Organizations: A Tentative Roadmap," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(3), pages 491-502, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marisleidy Alba Cabañas, 2018. "Tendencias organizacionales y contables contemporáneas," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Contaduría Pública, number 08.
    2. Thomas Brenner & Matthias Duschl, 2018. "Modeling Firm and Market Dynamics: A Flexible Model Reproducing Existing Stylized Facts on Firm Growth," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 52(3), pages 745-772, October.
    3. Jan-Erik Vahlne & Jan Johanson, 2017. "From internationalization to evolution: The Uppsala model at 40 years," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 48(9), pages 1087-1102, December.
    4. Matthijs Janssen & Carolina Castaldi & Alexander Alexiev, 2014. "Dynamic capabilities for service innovation: conceptualization and measurement," Working Papers 14-07, Eindhoven Center for Innovation Studies, revised Mar 2014.
    5. Grazia D Santangelo & Klaus E Meyer, 2017. "Internationalization as an evolutionary process," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 48(9), pages 1114-1130, December.
    6. Fu, Xiaolan & Hou, Jun & Liu, Xiaohui, 2018. "Unpacking the Relationship between Outward Direct Investment and Innovation Performance: Evidence from Chinese firms," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 111-123.
    7. Linda Argote & Henrich R. Greve, 2007. "A Behavioral Theory of the Firm ---40 Years and Counting: Introduction and Impact," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(3), pages 337-349, June.
    8. Hameed, Kamran & Arshed, Noman & Yazdani, Naveed & Munir, Mubbasher, 2021. "Motivating business towards innovation: A panel data study using dynamic capability framework," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    9. Thomas Brenner & Matthias Duschl, 2014. "Modelling Firm and Market Dynamics - A Flexible Model Reproducing Existing Stylized Facts," Working Papers on Innovation and Space 2014-07, Philipps University Marburg, Department of Geography.
    10. Neil M Kay, 2018. "We need to talk: opposing narratives and conflicting perspectives in the conversation on routines," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 27(6), pages 943-956.
    11. Kang, Taewon & Baek, Chulwoo & Lee, Jeong-Dong, 2017. "The persistency and volatility of the firm R&D investment: Revisited from the perspective of technological capability," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(9), pages 1570-1579.
    12. FeCheng Ma & Farhan Khan & Kashif Ullah Khan & Si XiangYun, 2021. "Investigating the Impact of Information Technology, Absorptive Capacity, and Dynamic Capabilities on Firm Performance: An Empirical Study," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, November.
    13. Prasad Pant, Laxmi & Hambly Odame, Helen & Hall, Andy & Sulaiman, Rasheed, 2008. "Learning Networks Matter: Challenges to Developing Learning-Based Competence in Mango Production and Post-Harvest in Andhra Pradesh, India," MERIT Working Papers 2008-069, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    14. David G. Sirmon & Michael A. Hitt, 2003. "Managing Resources: Linking Unique Resources, Management, and Wealth Creation in Family Firms," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 27(4), pages 339-358, October.
    15. Javier Papa & Luke Rehill & Brendan O'Connor, 2021. "Patterns of Firm-Level Productivity in Ireland," The Economic and Social Review, Economic and Social Studies, vol. 52(3), pages 241-268.
    16. Mario Cimoli & Gabriel Porcile, 2014. "Technology, structural change and BOP-constrained growth: a structuralist toolbox," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 38(1), pages 215-237.
    17. Hock-Doepgen, Marianne & Clauss, Thomas & Kraus, Sascha & Cheng, Cheng-Feng, 2021. "Knowledge management capabilities and organizational risk-taking for business model innovation in SMEs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 683-697.
    18. Sheng, Margaret L. & Chien, Iting, 2016. "Rethinking organizational learning orientation on radical and incremental innovation in high-tech firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(6), pages 2302-2308.
    19. Angelica Sbardella & Emanuele Pugliese & Andrea Zaccaria & Pasquale Scaramozzino, 2018. "The role of complex analysis in modeling economic growth," Papers 1808.10428, arXiv.org.
    20. Lee, Ruby P. & Johnson, Jean L. & Grewal, Rajdeep, 2008. "Understanding the antecedents of collateral learning in new product alliances," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 192-200.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ext:admone:51. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Carolina Esguerra (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://administracion.uexternado.edu.co .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.