IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/era/eriabk/978-602-8660-91-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Asia-Europe Connectivity Vision 2025: Challenges and Opportunities

Editor

Listed:
  • Anita Prakash

Abstract

The Asia–Europe Meeting (ASEM) represents 62% of the global population, 57% of global gross domestic product, and 65% of global trade. Intraregional trade in goods and services, spurred by trade liberalisation and foreign direct investment, have proved to be a powerful engine for growth and participation in global value chains (GVCs). In the ASEM region GVCs have clustered around regional production hubs which are also top destinations for foreign direct investment (FDI). The key policy determinants of GVC trade in the ASEM region are deeper regional integration, trade liberalisation, improvements in the conduciveness of the business environment, and openness to FDI. Trade liberalisation has enabled Europe and Asia to participate in GVCs, significantly reducing tariff barriers to the trade of intermediate and final goods. Liberalisation of trade in services is a vital input for GVC production, adding value at each stage of the production process. The ASEM Economic Ministers’ Meeting (EMM) can recognise the different business realities in Asia and Europe and rethink a complementary policy agenda for an open, transparent, and predictable trade and investment regime to leverage inclusive engagement in GVCs. The ASEM EMM has the mandate and opportunity to promote the institutionalisation of public–private dialogue mechanisms to gather the views of different stakeholders that are affected or likely to be affected by increased economic and institutional connectivity between Europe and Asia. Besides a coordinated policy response on the issues listed above, engagement of different economic actors – including traders, logistics services providers, trade support institutions, investors, and border agencies – in the policy dialogue will ensure that the ASEM EMM follows the whole-of-supply-chain approach. This approach will ensure the expansion, inclusiveness, and sustainability of the GVC structures in the ASEM region.

Suggested Citation

  • Anita Prakash (ed.), 2019. "Asia-Europe Connectivity Vision 2025: Challenges and Opportunities," Books, Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA), number 978-602-8660-91-4, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:era:eriabk:978-602-8660-91-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.eria.org/uploads/media/Global_Value_Chain_Structure_in_ASEM_Region.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Asian Development Bank (ADB) & Asian Development Bank (ADB) & Asian Development Bank (ADB) & Asian Development Bank (ADB), 2015. "Integrating SMEs into Global Value Chains: Challenges and Policy Actions in Asia," ADB Reports RPT157679-2, Asian Development Bank (ADB).
    2. Olivier CADOT & Lili Yan ING, 2015. "Non-tariff Measures and Harmonisation: Issues for the RCEP," Working Papers DP-2015-61, Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA).
    3. Kirkegaard, Jacob Funk, 2012. "Transactions: A New Look at Service Sector Foreign Direct Investment in Asia," ADB Economics Working Paper Series 318, Asian Development Bank.
    4. Anabela Correia de Brito & Céline Kauffmann & Jacques Pelkmans, 2016. "The contribution of mutual recognition to international regulatory co-operation," OECD Regulatory Policy Working Papers 2, OECD Publishing.
    5. Asian Development Bank Institute, 2015. "Integrating SMEs into Global Value Chains: Challenges and Policy Actions in Asia," Working Papers id:7658, eSocialSciences.
    6. Huh, Hyeon-Seung & Park, Cyn-Young, 2018. "Asia-Pacific regional integration index: Construction, interpretation, and comparison," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 22-38.
    7. Robert Grundke & Stéphanie Jamet & Margarita Kalamova & François Keslair & Mariagrazia Squicciarini, 2017. "Skills and global value chains: A characterisation," OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers 2017/05, OECD Publishing.
    8. Vinokurov, Evgeny, 2017. "Eurasian Economic Union: Current state and preliminary results," Russian Journal of Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(1), pages 54-70.
    9. Baldwin, Richard, 2012. "Trade and industrialisation after globalisation?s 2nd unbundling: How building and joining a supply chain are different and why," CEPR Discussion Papers 8768, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nam Hoang Vu & Tuan Anh Bui & Tram Bao Hoang & Hanh My Pham, 2022. "Information technology adoption and integration into global value chains: Evidence from small‐ and medium‐sized enterprises in Vietnam," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(2), pages 259-286, March.
    2. Jamil Paolo Francisco & Tristan Canare & Jean Rebecca Labios, 2018. "Obstacles and Enablers of Internationalization of Philippine SMEs Through Participation in Global Value Chains," Working Papers id:12905, eSocialSciences.
    3. Lanz, Rainer & Lundquist, Kathryn & Mansio, Grégoire & Maurer, Andreas & Teh, Robert, 2018. "E-commerce and developing country-SME participation in global value chains," WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2018-13, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
    4. Maningo, Gary V., 2016. "Credit Surety Fund: A Credit Innovation for Micro, Small, and Medium-Sized Enterprises in the Philippines," ADBI Working Papers 589, Asian Development Bank Institute.
    5. S. Pobyvayev A. & С. Побываев А., 2016. "ГЛОБАЛЬНЫЕ ЦЕПОЧКИ СТОИМОСТИ И ИХ ПОТЕНЦИАЛЬНАЯ РОЛЬ В РАЗВИТИИ РОССИЙСКО-БЕЛОРУССКОЙ ИНТЕГРАЦИИ // Global Value Chains and Their Potential Role in the Development of Russian-Belarusian Integration," Мир новой экономики // The world of new economy, Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации // Financial University under The Governtment оf The Russian Federation, issue 4, pages 41-50.
    6. Eva Cihelková & Irina Platonova & Yelena Frolova, 2019. "Comparative Analysis of Supporting Small and Medium Enterprises for Enhancing Created Added Value in the EU and China," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(1), pages 256-269.
    7. Torres de Oliveira, Rui & Nguyen, Tam & Liesch, Peter & Verreynne, Martie-Louise & Indulska, Marta, 2021. "Exporting to escape and learn: Vietnamese manufacturers in global value chains," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 56(4).
    8. Aleksandar M. Damnjanovic & Goran Dzafic & Sandra Nesic & Dragan Milosevic & Gordana Mrdak & Sinisa M. Arsic, 2022. "Strategic Management of External Disruptions on Realization of Business Plans—Case of Serbian Manufacturing Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-22, September.
    9. Mauro Boffa & Marion Jansen & Olga Solleder, 2021. "Participating to Compete: Do Small Firms in Developing Countries Benefit from Global Value Chains?," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-25, February.
    10. Haraguchi, Nobuya & Martorano, Bruno & Sanfilippo, Marco, 2019. "What factors drive successful industrialization? Evidence and implications for developing countries," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 266-276.
    11. Yoshino, Naoyuki & Taghizadeh-Hesary, Farhad, 2016. "Major Challenges Facing Small and Medium-sized Enterprises in Asia and Solutions for Mitigating Them," ADBI Working Papers 564, Asian Development Bank Institute.
    12. Teerawat Charoenrat & Charles Harvie, 2017. "The Performance of Thai Manufacturing SMEs: Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) Approach," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 18(5), pages 1178-1198, October.
    13. Maria O. Kazaryan, 2022. "Оценка Уровня Интеграции В Странах Снг+ В 2010-2020 Гг," Russian Economic Development (in Russian), Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy, issue 10, pages 35-40, October.
    14. Popescu Raluca Maria, 2021. "European Union vs. Eurasian Union – a brief comparative analysis and perspectives for cooperation," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 15(1), pages 1294-1304, December.
    15. Robert Tumanyan, 2018. "Economic unions and the gravity model: evidence from Eurasian economic union," Asian Journal of Empirical Research, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 8(3), pages 90-98, March.
    16. Hurmekoski, Elias & Hetemäki, Lauri, 2013. "Studying the future of the forest sector: Review and implications for long-term outlook studies," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 17-29.
    17. Batsaikhan, Uuriintuya & Dabrowski, Marek, 2017. "Central Asia — twenty-five years after the breakup of the USSR," Russian Journal of Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(3), pages 296-320.
    18. Richard Baldwin & Javier Lopez-Gonzalez, 2015. "Supply-chain Trade: A Portrait of Global Patterns and Several Testable Hypotheses," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(11), pages 1682-1721, November.
    19. Augusto Cerqua & Pierluigi Montalbano & Zhansaya Temerbulatova, 2021. "A decade of Eurasian Integration: An ex-post non-parametric assessment of the Eurasian Economic Union," Working Papers 1/21, Sapienza University of Rome, DISS.
    20. Dezhong Duan & Yang Zhang & Ying Chen & Debin Du, 2019. "Regional Integration in the Inter-City Technology Transfer System of the Yangtze River Delta, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-19, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:era:eriabk:978-602-8660-91-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ranti Amelia (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eriadid.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.