IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/govaah/2-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The contribution of mutual recognition to international regulatory co-operation

Author

Listed:
  • Anabela Correia de Brito

    (Centre for European Policy Studies)

  • Céline Kauffmann

    (OECD)

  • Jacques Pelkmans

    (Centre for European Policy Studies)

Abstract

This study takes stock of the institutional setting, operational modalities, strengths and weaknesses of various forms of mutual recognition when used in different sector and country contexts. It aims to build a greater understanding of the benefits and pitfalls of one of the 11 mechanisms of international regulatory co-operation identified by the OECD Regulatory Policy Committee in OECD (2013), International Regulatory Co-operation: Addressing Global Challenges. The paper relies on an empirical stocktaking of mutual recognition agreements (MRAs) among selected OECD countries, the systematic review of mutual recognition clauses in trade agreements, case studies of the specific experience of the EU internal market, the Trans-Tasman arrangement, and the MRA between the US and the EU of 1998, and an extensive review of the literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Anabela Correia de Brito & Céline Kauffmann & Jacques Pelkmans, 2016. "The contribution of mutual recognition to international regulatory co-operation," OECD Regulatory Policy Working Papers 2, OECD Publishing.
    • Handle: RePEc:oec:govaah:2-en
    DOI: 10.1787/5jm56fqsfxmx-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/5jm56fqsfxmx-en
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/5jm56fqsfxmx-en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anita Prakash (ed.), 2019. "Asia-Europe Connectivity Vision 2025: Challenges and Opportunities," Books, Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA), number 978-602-8660-91-4, July.
    2. Piera Bello & Vincenzo Galasso, 2020. "Old before their time: the role of employers in retirement decisions," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 27(5), pages 1198-1223, October.
    3. Jong-Myong Park & Joong-Hee Cho & Nam-Soo Jun & Ki-In Bang & Ji-Won Hong, 2022. "Worker Protection Scenarios for General Analytical Testing Facility under Several Infection Propagation Risks: Scoping Review, Epidemiological Model and ISO 31000," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-16, September.
    4. Annalisa Zezza & Federica Demaria & Maria Rosaria Pupo d'Andrea & Jo Swinnen & Giulia Meloni & Senne Vandevelde & Alessandro Olper & Daniele Curzi & Valentina Raimondi & Sophie Drogue, 2018. "Research for AGRI Committee - Agricultural trade: assessing reciprocity of standards," Working Papers hal-02787948, HAL.
    5. Benjamin Bürbaumer, 2021. "The Limits of Traditional Bargaining under Deep Integration: TTIP Stumbling over Technical Barriers to Trade," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(5), pages 1069-1085, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    mutual recognition; regulatory policy; trade agreements;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F1 - International Economics - - Trade
    • F5 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy
    • H7 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations
    • K2 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:govaah:2-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/teoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.