IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zib/zbnaim/v1y2017i1p1-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Teaching Performance Evaluation Framework: An Analytic Hierarchy Process Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Azizul Azhar Ramli

    (Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia Parit Raja, 86400 Batu Pahat, Johor, Malaysia)

  • Shahreen Kasim

    (Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia Parit Raja, 86400 Batu Pahat, Johor, Malaysia)

  • Mohd. Farhan Md. Fuzzee

    (Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia Parit Raja, 86400 Batu Pahat,Johor, Malaysia)

  • Hairulnizam Mahdin

    (Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia Parit Raja, 86400 Batu Pahat,Johor, Malaysia)

Abstract

Teaching performance evaluation process in higher learning institutions (HLI) is of the most importance in building a higher education policy which purposes for teaching improvement and administrative decision making. Several issues have been raised such as 1) instrument characteristic used to detect values is not sufficient to handle subjective evaluation criteria’s and, 2) the most techniques used in handling survey data is statistical method. In conventional practice, ordinal Likert scales used for marking schema and statistical techniques are implemented for analyzing the data. In order to manage the issues, this research presents a multi-criteria decision making methodology, called analytic hierarchical process (AHP) to evaluate HLI instructors teaching performance. As a well known decision making approach, AHP can systematically cope with highly subjective problems in social system. An AHP implementation framework for teaching performance evaluation will use the possible internal factors; preparation, organization, delivery and effectiveness that are evaluated as teaching evaluation weight. The future work is also suggested, this evaluation system should be implemented in real time situations. It becomes the best platform to evaluate teaching performance and categorize instructors into appropriate bands.

Suggested Citation

  • Azizul Azhar Ramli & Shahreen Kasim & Mohd. Farhan Md. Fuzzee & Hairulnizam Mahdin, 2017. "Teaching Performance Evaluation Framework: An Analytic Hierarchy Process Approach," Acta Informatica Malaysia (AIM), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 1(1), pages 1-6, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:zib:zbnaim:v:1:y:2017:i:1:p:1-6
    DOI: 10.26480/aim.01.2017.01.06
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://actainformaticamalaysia.com/download/629/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26480/aim.01.2017.01.06?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joaquin Pérez, 1995. "Some Comments on Saaty's AHP," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(6), pages 1091-1095, June.
    2. S-K Lai & L D Hopkins, 1989. "The Meanings of Trade-Offs in Multiattribute Evaluation Methods: A Comparison," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 16(2), pages 155-170, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liu Chuanlei & Yin JiXing & Ma LinCong & Han Yuan Fei & Wu Guojun, 2018. "The Fusion Of The Love View Of Contemporary College Students And Fromm's Thought," Education, Sustainability & Society (ESS), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 1(1), pages 8-10, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joaquín Pérez, José L. Jimeno, Ethel Mokotoff, 2001. "Another potential strong shortcoming of AHP," Doctorado en Economía- documentos de trabajo 8/02, Programa de doctorado en Economía. Universidad de Alcalá., revised 01 Jun 2002.
    2. Bolloju, N., 2001. "Aggregation of analytic hierarchy process models based on similarities in decision makers' preferences," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(3), pages 499-508, February.
    3. Lai, S-K., 1995. "A preference-based interpretation of AHP," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 23(4), pages 453-462, August.
    4. Yeh, Chung-Hsing & J. Willis, Robert & Deng, Hepu & Pan, Hongqi, 1999. "Task oriented weighting in multi-criteria analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(1), pages 130-146, November.
    5. Leung, L. C. & Cao, D., 2000. "On consistency and ranking of alternatives in fuzzy AHP," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(1), pages 102-113, July.
    6. Leung, Lawrence C. & Cao, Dong, 2001. "On the efficacy of modeling multi-attribute decision problems using AHP and Sinarchy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(1), pages 39-49, July.
    7. Contreras, Francisco & Hanaki, Keisuke & Aramaki, Toshiya & Connors, Stephen, 2008. "Application of analytical hierarchy process to analyze stakeholders preferences for municipal solid waste management plans, Boston, USA," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 52(7), pages 979-991.
    8. Rezaei, Jafar, 2015. "Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 49-57.
    9. Luis G. Vargas, 2016. "Voting with Intensity of Preferences," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(04), pages 839-859, July.
    10. Tsuen-Ho Hsu & Ling-Zhong Lin, 2014. "Using Fuzzy Preference Method for Group Package Tour Based on the Risk Perception," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 299-323, March.
    11. L C Leung & Y V Hui & M Zheng, 2003. "Analysis of compatibility between interdependent matrices in ANP," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 54(7), pages 758-768, July.
    12. Kevin Kam Fung Yuen, 2014. "The Least Penalty Optimization Prioritization Operators for the Analytic Hierarchy Process: A Revised Case of Medical Decision Problem of Organ Transplantation," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(4), pages 442-461, December.
    13. Rujee Rodcha & Nitin K. Tripathi & Rajendra Prasad Shrestha, 2019. "Comparison of Cash Crop Suitability Assessment Using Parametric, AHP, and FAHP Methods," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-22, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zib:zbnaim:v:1:y:2017:i:1:p:1-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Zibeline International Publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://actainformaticamalaysia.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.