IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wsi/jecxxx/v13y2005i01ns0218495805000033.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Organizational Strategy, Individual Personality And Innovation Behavior

Author

Listed:
  • BJØRN WILLY ÅMO

    (Bodø Graduate School of Business, Norway)

  • LARS KOLVEREID

    (Bodø Graduate School of Business, Norway)

Abstract

Two competing models of innovation behavior in organizations are tested. The first model is derived from the corporate entrepreneurship literature, suggesting that the extent to which the organization has a deliberate entrepreneurship strategy determine employees' involvement in innovation and change (Kanter, 1984). The competing model is derived from the intrapreneurship literature, primarily Pinchot (1985) and Pinchot and Pellman (1999), where the emphasis is on the employee's individual personality measured by items derived from Pinchot's (1985) test: "Are you an intrapreneur?" Both models are compared to a base model that contains relevant control variables. Finally, a fourth model, which combines all variables are compared to the other three. The models are tested using a sample of 634 business graduates employed in a diverse set of occupations and organizations. The results indicate that both the strategy and personality models outperform the base model. Moreover, the model that combines the personality of the individual and the strategy of the organization performs even better than the each of the two models separately.

Suggested Citation

  • Bjørn Willy Åmo & Lars Kolvereid, 2005. "Organizational Strategy, Individual Personality And Innovation Behavior," Journal of Enterprising Culture (JEC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 13(01), pages 7-19.
  • Handle: RePEc:wsi:jecxxx:v:13:y:2005:i:01:n:s0218495805000033
    DOI: 10.1142/S0218495805000033
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0218495805000033
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1142/S0218495805000033?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Christoph Constantin Niemann & Petra Dickel & Gordon Eckardt, 2020. "The interplay of corporate entrepreneurship, environmental orientation, and performance in clean‐tech firms—A double‐edged sword," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 180-196, January.
    2. Köhn, Philipp & Ruf, Philipp Julian & Moog, Petra, 2023. "Why are non-family employees intrapreneurially active in family firms? A multiple case study," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 14(3).
    3. Dhar, Rajib Lochan, 2016. "Ethical leadership and its impact on service innovative behavior: The role of LMX and job autonomy," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 139-148.
    4. Erik Monsen & Holger Patzelt & Todd Saxton, 2010. "Beyond Simple Utility: Incentive Design and Trade–Offs for Corporate Employee–Entrepreneurs," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 34(1), pages 105-130, January.
    5. Bilal Ahmad & Da Liu & Mirza Huzaifa Asif & Muhammad Ashfaq & Muhammad Irfan, 2022. "Ambidextrous Leadership and Service Recovery Performance Under B2B Selling Context: An Examination Through Service Innovation Capability," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, May.
    6. Denisa Maria VILCEANU, 2022. "Entrepreneurship in Public Institutions," RAIS Journal for Social Sciences, Research Association for Interdisciplinary Studies, vol. 6(1), pages 1-6, May.
    7. Huseyin Arasli & Hasan Evrim Arici & Ezel Kole, 2020. "Constructive Leadership and Employee Innovative Behaviors: A Serial Mediation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-17, March.
    8. Michael Mustafa & Fiona Gavin & Mathew Hughes, 2018. "Contextual Determinants of Employee Entrepreneurial Behavior in Support of Corporate Entrepreneurship: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda," Journal of Enterprising Culture (JEC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 26(03), pages 285-326, September.
    9. Hernández-Perlines, Felipe & Ariza-Montes, Antonio & Blanco-González-Tejero, Cristina, 2022. "Intrapreneurship research: A comprehensive literature review," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 428-444.
    10. Christine Blanka, 2019. "An individual-level perspective on intrapreneurship: a review and ways forward," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 13(5), pages 919-961, November.
    11. William Wales & Erik Monsen & Alexander McKelvie, 2011. "The Organizational Pervasiveness of Entrepreneurial Orientation," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 35(5), pages 895-923, September.
    12. Huang, Yi-Fen & Lin, Hung-Chun & Lee, Hsu-Mei, 2023. "Innovation in manufacturing SMEs during the COVID-19 pandemic: How does environmental dynamism reinforce employee proactive behavior?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    13. Erik Monsen & R. Wayne Boss, 2009. "The Impact of Strategic Entrepreneurship inside the Organization: Examining Job Stress and Employee Retention," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 33(1), pages 71-104, January.
    14. Tatyana A. Vinogradova & Mikhail S. Kuvshinov, 2022. "The study of employees’ innovative behaviour at industrial enterprises," Journal of New Economy, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 23(3), pages 109-126, October.
    15. Dirk De Clercq & Dimo Dimov & Imanol Belausteguigoitia, 2016. "Perceptions of Adverse Work Conditions and Innovative Behavior: The Buffering Roles of Relational Resources," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 40(3), pages 515-542, May.
    16. Cayetano Medina Molina & Domingo Ribeiro Soriano & Cristina Blanco González-Tejero, 2023. "Multi-level corporate entrepreneurship in SMEs: an intra-metropolitan analysis," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(7), pages 2185-2213, October.
    17. Niemann, Christoph Constantin & Mai, Robert & Dickel, Petra, 2022. "Nurture or nature? How organizational and individual factors drive corporate entrepreneurial projects," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 155-169.
    18. Nazar Omer Abdallah Ahmed, 2016. "Relationship between Innovation Climate, Market Orientation and Corporate Entrepreneurship," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 6(3), pages 476-480.
    19. Servet Nasifoglu Elidemir & Ali Ozturen & Steven W. Bayighomog, 2020. "Innovative Behaviors, Employee Creativity, and Sustainable Competitive Advantage: A Moderated Mediation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, April.
    20. Ruud Gerards & Sanne Wetten & Cecile Sambeek, 2021. "New ways of working and intrapreneurial behaviour: the mediating role of transformational leadership and social interaction," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(7), pages 2075-2110, October.
    21. Izlem Gozukara & Osman Yildirim, 2016. "Exploring the link between Distributive Justice and Innovative Behavior: Organizational Learning Capacity as a Mediator," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 6(2), pages 61-75, April.
    22. Blanka, Christine & Krumay, Barbara & Rueckel, David, 2022. "The interplay of digital transformation and employee competency: A design science approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    23. Megan Rose & Elliroma Gardiner & Jonas Debrulle, 2022. "A Story of Serial Mediation: Intrapreneurship Explained through a Combination of Individual and Organisational Factors," Merits, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-13, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:jecxxx:v:13:y:2005:i:01:n:s0218495805000033. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tai Tone Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.worldscinet.com/jec/jec.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.