IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wsi/ijitdm/v16y2017i06ns0219622017500304.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Natural Method for Ranking Objects from Hesitant Fuzzy Preference Relations

Author

Listed:
  • Jie Tang

    (School of Business, Central South University, Changsha 410083, P. R. China)

  • Qingxian An

    (School of Business, Central South University, Changsha 410083, P. R. China‡Industrial Systems Optimization Laboratory, Charles Delaunay Institute and UMR CNRS 6281, University of Technology of Troyes, Troyes 10004, France)

  • Fanyong Meng

    (#x2020;School of International Audit, Nanjing Audit University, Nanjing 211815, P. R. China)

  • Xiaohong Chen

    (School of Business, Central South University, Changsha 410083, P. R. China)

Abstract

Hesitant fuzzy preference relations (HFPRs) are efficient tools to denoting the decision maker’s judgements that permit the decision makers to compare objects using several values in [0, 1], and the number of elements in different hesitant fuzzy elements may be different. After reviewing the previous researches about decision making with HFPRs, one can find that there are several limitations. To avoid these issues and to guarantee the reasonable ranking order, this paper introduces a new additive consistency concept for HFPRs. Different from the previous consistency concepts, the new concept neither needs to add values into hesitant fuzzy elements nor disregards any information offered by the decision makers. To measure the additive consistency of HFPRs, two 0-1 mixed programming models are constructed. Meanwhile, an additive consistency based 0-1 mixed programming model is established to determining the missing values in incomplete HFPRs that can address the situation where ignored objects exist. Then, an algorithm to obtaining the hesitant fuzzy priority weight vector from (incomplete) HFPRs is provided. Considering group decision making, a new group consensus index is defined, and an interactive approach to improving the group consensus level of individual HFPRs is offered. Furthermore, a probability distance measure between two HFPRs is defined to deriving the weights of the decision makers. According to the additive consistency and consensus analysis, an approach to group decision making with incomplete and inconsistent HFPRs is performed. Finally, two practical numerical examples are provided, and comparison analysis is offered.

Suggested Citation

  • Jie Tang & Qingxian An & Fanyong Meng & Xiaohong Chen, 2017. "A Natural Method for Ranking Objects from Hesitant Fuzzy Preference Relations," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(06), pages 1611-1646, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:wsi:ijitdm:v:16:y:2017:i:06:n:s0219622017500304
    DOI: 10.1142/S0219622017500304
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0219622017500304
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1142/S0219622017500304?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mikhailov, L., 2002. "Fuzzy analytical approach to partnership selection in formation of virtual enterprises," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 393-401, October.
    2. Yang, J.B. & Wang, Y.M. & Xu, D.L. & Chin, K.S., 2006. "The evidential reasoning approach for MADA under both probabilistic and fuzzy uncertainties," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 171(1), pages 309-343, May.
    3. Kou, Gang & Ergu, Daji & Shang, Jennifer, 2014. "Enhancing data consistency in decision matrix: Adapting Hadamard model to mitigate judgment contradiction," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 236(1), pages 261-271.
    4. Saaty, Thomas L. & Vargas, Luis G., 1987. "Uncertainty and rank order in the analytic hierarchy process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 107-117, October.
    5. Pal, Shilpi & Mahapatra, G.S. & Samanta, G.P., 2014. "An EPQ model of ramp type demand with Weibull deterioration under inflation and finite horizon in crisp and fuzzy environment," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 159-166.
    6. Fanyong Meng & Qingxian An & Xiaohong Chen, 2016. "A consistency and consensus-based method to group decision making with interval linguistic preference relations," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 67(11), pages 1419-1437, November.
    7. Guangxu Li & Gang Kou & Changsheng Lin & Liang Xu & Yi Liao, 2015. "Multi-attribute decision making with generalized fuzzy numbers," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 66(11), pages 1793-1803, November.
    8. Dong, Yucheng & Xu, Yinfeng & Li, Hongyi & Feng, Bo, 2010. "The OWA-based consensus operator under linguistic representation models using position indexes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 203(2), pages 455-463, June.
    9. Meng, Fanyong & Tan, Chunqiao & Chen, Xiaohong, 2017. "Multiplicative consistency analysis for interval fuzzy preference relations: A comparative study," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 17-38.
    10. Yeh, Chung-Hsing & Deng, Hepu & Chang, Yu-Hern, 2000. "Fuzzy multicriteria analysis for performance evaluation of bus companies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 126(3), pages 459-473, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Meng, Fanyong & Xiong, Beibei, 2021. "Logical efficiency decomposition for general two-stage systems in view of cross efficiency," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(2), pages 622-632.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jie Tang & Fanyong Meng & Francisco Javier Cabrerizo & Enrique Herrera-Viedma, 2020. "Group Decision Making with Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Multiplicative Linguistic Preference Relations," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 169-206, February.
    2. Yongming Song & Jun Hu, 2017. "Vector similarity measures of hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and their applications," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(12), pages 1-13, December.
    3. Wang, Ying-Ming & Elhag, Taha M.S., 2007. "A goal programming method for obtaining interval weights from an interval comparison matrix," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(1), pages 458-471, February.
    4. Fu, Chao & Yang, Shanlin, 2011. "An attribute weight based feedback model for multiple attributive group decision analysis problems with group consensus requirements in evidential reasoning context," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 212(1), pages 179-189, July.
    5. Fu, Chao & Yang, Shanlin, 2012. "An evidential reasoning based consensus model for multiple attribute group decision analysis problems with interval-valued group consensus requirements," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 223(1), pages 167-176.
    6. Gia Sirbiladze & Irina Khutsishvili & Otar Badagadze & Mikheil Kapanadze, 2016. "More Precise Decision-Making Methodology in the Temporalized Body of Evidence. Application in the Information Technology Management," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(06), pages 1469-1502, November.
    7. Yulan Wang & Huayou Chen & Ligang Zhou, 2013. "Logarithm Compatibility of Interval Multiplicative Preference Relations with an Application to Determining the Optimal Weights of Experts in the Group Decision Making," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 759-772, July.
    8. Wu, Zhibin & Huang, Shuai & Xu, Jiuping, 2019. "Multi-stage optimization models for individual consistency and group consensus with preference relations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(1), pages 182-194.
    9. Zhang, Hengjie & Dong, Yucheng & Chiclana, Francisco & Yu, Shui, 2019. "Consensus efficiency in group decision making: A comprehensive comparative study and its optimal design," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(2), pages 580-598.
    10. Virgilio López-Morales & Joel Suárez-Cansino, 2017. "Reliable Intervals Method in Decision-Based Support Models for Group Decision-Making," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(01), pages 183-204, January.
    11. Guo, Min & Yang, Jian-Bo & Chin, Kwai-Sang & Wang, Hongwei, 2007. "Evidential reasoning based preference programming for multiple attribute decision analysis under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 182(3), pages 1294-1312, November.
    12. Wanying Xie & Zeshui Xu & Zhiliang Ren & Hai Wang, 2018. "Probabilistic Linguistic Analytic Hierarchy Process and Its Application on the Performance Assessment of Xiongan New Area," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(06), pages 1693-1724, November.
    13. Zeshui Xu & Xiaoqiang Cai, 2014. "Deriving Weights from Interval Multiplicative Preference Relations in Group Decision Making," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 695-713, July.
    14. Shaher H. Zyoud & Daniela Fuchs-Hanusch, 2019. "Comparison of Several Decision-Making Techniques: A Case of Water Losses Management in Developing Countries," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(05), pages 1551-1578, September.
    15. Chung-Ho Su, 2017. "A Novel Hybrid Learning Achievement Prediction Model: A Case Study in Gamification Education Applications (APPs)," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(02), pages 515-543, March.
    16. Gia Sirbiladze, 2016. "New Fuzzy Aggregation Operators Based on the Finite Choquet Integral — Application in the MADM Problem," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(03), pages 517-551, May.
    17. Honghao Zhang & Yong Peng & Guangdong Tian & Danqi Wang & Pengpeng Xie, 2017. "Green material selection for sustainability: A hybrid MCDM approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-26, May.
    18. Wang, Zhou-Jing, 2015. "A note on “A goal programming model for incomplete interval multiplicative preference relations and its application in group decision-making”," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(3), pages 867-871.
    19. Yazidi, Anis & Ivanovska, Magdalena & Zennaro, Fabio M. & Lind, Pedro G. & Viedma, Enrique Herrera, 2022. "A new decision making model based on Rank Centrality for GDM with fuzzy preference relations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(3), pages 1030-1041.
    20. Fatih Tüysüz, 2018. "Simulated Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Sets-Based Approach for Modeling Uncertainty in AHP Method," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(03), pages 801-817, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:ijitdm:v:16:y:2017:i:06:n:s0219622017500304. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tai Tone Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.worldscinet.com/ijitdm/ijitdm.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.