IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wsi/ijitdm/v13y2014i01ns0219622014500059.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Credibility-Based Fuzzy Mathematical Programming Model For Portfolio Selection Under Uncertainty

Author

Listed:
  • MUKESH KUMAR MEHLAWAT

    (Department of Operational Research, University of Delhi, Delhi –110007, India)

  • PANKAJ GUPTA

    (Department of Operational Research, University of Delhi, Delhi –110007, India)

Abstract

In this paper, we develop a hybrid bi-objective credibility-based fuzzy mathematical programming model for portfolio selection under fuzzy environment. To deal with imprecise parameters, we use a hybrid credibility-based approach that combines the expected value and chance constrained programming techniques. The model simultaneously maximizes the portfolio return and minimizes the portfolio risk. We also consider an additional important criterion, namely, portfolio liquidity as a constraint in the model to make it better suited for practical applications. The proposed fuzzy optimization model is solved using a two-phase approach. An empirical study is included to demonstrate applicability of the proposed model and the solution approach in real-world applications of portfolio selection.

Suggested Citation

  • Mukesh Kumar Mehlawat & Pankaj Gupta, 2014. "Credibility-Based Fuzzy Mathematical Programming Model For Portfolio Selection Under Uncertainty," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 13(01), pages 101-135.
    • Handle: RePEc:wsi:ijitdm:v:13:y:2014:i:01:n:s0219622014500059
    DOI: 10.1142/S0219622014500059
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0219622014500059
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1142/S0219622014500059?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Srichander Ramaswamy, 1998. "Portfolio selection using fuzzy decision theory," BIS Working Papers 59, Bank for International Settlements.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yong-Jun Liu & Wei-Guo Zhang, 2018. "Multiperiod Fuzzy Portfolio Selection Optimization Model Based on Possibility Theory," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(03), pages 941-968, May.
    2. Xiaoxia Huang & Xuting Wang, 2019. "Portfolio Investment with Options Based on Uncertainty Theory," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(03), pages 929-952, May.
    3. Fabio De Felice & Laura Petrillo & Luigi Ranieri & Antonella Petrillo, 2019. "Previous Studies and Differences Between Lean Management and World Class Manufacturing," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(06), pages 1941-1966, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Masafumi Nakano & Akihiko Takahashi & Soichiro Takahashi, 2017. "Robust Technical Trading with Fuzzy Knowledge-based Systems," CIRJE F-Series CIRJE-F-1053, CIRJE, Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo.
    2. Madlener, Reinhard & Glensk, Barbara & Weber, Veronika, 2011. "Fuzzy Portfolio Optimization of Onshore Wind Power Plants," FCN Working Papers 10/2011, E.ON Energy Research Center, Future Energy Consumer Needs and Behavior (FCN), revised Jul 2014.
    3. Jiuping Xu & Xiaoyang Zhou & Desheng Wu, 2011. "Portfolio selection using λ mean and hybrid entropy," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 185(1), pages 213-229, May.
    4. Bilbao, A. & Arenas, M. & Rodriguez, M.V. & Antomil, J., 2007. "On constructing expert Betas for single-index model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 183(2), pages 827-847, December.
    5. Tsaur, Ruey-Chyn, 2013. "Fuzzy portfolio model with different investor risk attitudes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 227(2), pages 385-390.
    6. Fang, Yong & Lai, K.K. & Wang, Shou-Yang, 2006. "Portfolio rebalancing model with transaction costs based on fuzzy decision theory," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(2), pages 879-893, December.
    7. Masafumi Nakano & Akihiko Takahashi & Soichiro Takahashi, 2017. "Fuzzy Logic-based Portfolio Selection with Particle Filtering and Anomaly Detection," CIRJE F-Series CIRJE-F-1037, CIRJE, Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo.
    8. A Bilbao & M Arenas & M Jiménez & B Perez Gladish & M V Rodríguez, 2006. "An extension of Sharpe's single-index model: portfolio selection with expert betas," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 57(12), pages 1442-1451, December.
    9. Wei Chen, 2009. "Weighted portfolio selection models based on possibility theory," Fuzzy Information and Engineering, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 115-127, June.
    10. Liu, Yong-Jun & Zhang, Wei-Guo & Zhang, Pu, 2013. "A multi-period portfolio selection optimization model by using interval analysis," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 113-119.
    11. Li, Ting & Zhang, Weiguo & Xu, Weijun, 2013. "Fuzzy possibilistic portfolio selection model with VaR constraint and risk-free investment," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 12-17.
    12. Jiuping Xu & Xiaoyang Zhou & Steven Li, 2011. "A Class of Chance Constrained Multi-objective Portfolio Selection Model Under Fuzzy Random Environment," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 150(3), pages 530-552, September.
    13. Masafumi Nakano & Akihiko Takahashi & Soichiro Takahashi, 2017. "Robust technical trading with fuzzy knowledge-based systems (Forthcoming in "Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications".)," CARF F-Series CARF-F-413, Center for Advanced Research in Finance, Faculty of Economics, The University of Tokyo.
    14. Perez Gladish, B. & Jones, D.F. & Tamiz, M. & Bilbao Terol, A., 2007. "An interactive three-stage model for mutual funds portfolio selection," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 75-88, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:ijitdm:v:13:y:2014:i:01:n:s0219622014500059. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tai Tone Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.worldscinet.com/ijitdm/ijitdm.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.