IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navres/v64y2017i4p305-322.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Subspace dynamic‐simplex linear interpolation search for mixed‐integer black‐box optimization problems

Author

Listed:
  • Honggang Wang

Abstract

Design and management of complex systems with both integer and continuous decision variables can be guided using mixed‐integer optimization models and analysis. We propose a new mixed‐integer black‐box optimization (MIBO) method, subspace dynamic‐simplex linear interpolation search (SD‐SLIS), for decision making problems in which system performance can only be evaluated with a computer black‐box model. Through a sequence of gradient‐type local searches in subspaces of solution space, SD‐SLIS is particularly efficient for such MIBO problems with scaling issues. We discuss the convergence conditions and properties of SD‐SLIS algorithms for a class of MIBO problems. Under mild conditions, SD‐SLIS is proved to converge to a stationary solution asymptotically. We apply SD‐SLIS to six example problems including two MIBO problems associated with petroleum field development projects. The algorithm performance of SD‐SLIS is compared with that of a state‐of‐the‐art direct‐search method, NOMAD, and that of a full space simplex interpolation search, Full‐SLIS. The numerical results suggest that SD‐SLIS solves the example problems efficiently and outperforms the compared methods for most of the example cases. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Naval Research Logistics 64: 305–322, 2017

Suggested Citation

  • Honggang Wang, 2017. "Subspace dynamic‐simplex linear interpolation search for mixed‐integer black‐box optimization problems," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(4), pages 305-322, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:64:y:2017:i:4:p:305-322
    DOI: 10.1002/nav.21747
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.21747
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/nav.21747?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Raghu Pasupathy, 2010. "On Choosing Parameters in Retrospective-Approximation Algorithms for Stochastic Root Finding and Simulation Optimization," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(4-part-1), pages 889-901, August.
    2. Philip B. Zwart, 1970. "Nonlinear programming the choice of direction by gradient projection," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(4), pages 431-438, December.
    3. L. Jeff Hong & Barry L. Nelson, 2006. "Discrete Optimization via Simulation Using COMPASS," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 54(1), pages 115-129, February.
    4. Luis Rios & Nikolaos Sahinidis, 2013. "Derivative-free optimization: a review of algorithms and comparison of software implementations," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 1247-1293, July.
    5. Wang, Honggang, 2012. "Retrospective optimization of mixed-integer stochastic systems using dynamic simplex linear interpolation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 217(1), pages 141-148.
    6. Jerrold H. May, 1982. "Linearly constrained pseudo‐Newton method," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(3), pages 429-442, September.
    7. Michael C. Fu, 2008. "What you should know about simulation and derivatives," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 55(8), pages 723-736, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Honggang, 2012. "Retrospective optimization of mixed-integer stochastic systems using dynamic simplex linear interpolation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 217(1), pages 141-148.
    2. Satyajith Amaran & Nikolaos V. Sahinidis & Bikram Sharda & Scott J. Bury, 2016. "Simulation optimization: a review of algorithms and applications," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 240(1), pages 351-380, May.
    3. Wang, Honggang, 2017. "Multi-objective retrospective optimization using stochastic zigzag search," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 263(3), pages 946-960.
    4. Kyle Cooper & Susan R. Hunter & Kalyani Nagaraj, 2020. "Biobjective Simulation Optimization on Integer Lattices Using the Epsilon-Constraint Method in a Retrospective Approximation Framework," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 1080-1100, October.
    5. Jonas Bjerg Thomsen & Francesco Ferri & Jens Peter Kofoed & Kevin Black, 2018. "Cost Optimization of Mooring Solutions for Large Floating Wave Energy Converters," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-23, January.
    6. Songhao Wang & Szu Hui Ng & William Benjamin Haskell, 2022. "A Multilevel Simulation Optimization Approach for Quantile Functions," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 569-585, January.
    7. Gabriela Simonet & Julie Subervie & Driss Ezzine-De-Blas & Marina Cromberg & Amy Duchelle, 2015. "Paying smallholders not to cut down the amazon forest: impact evaluation of a REDD+ pilot project," Working Papers 1514, Chaire Economie du climat.
    8. Somayeh Moazeni & Warren B. Powell & Boris Defourny & Belgacem Bouzaiene-Ayari, 2017. "Parallel Nonstationary Direct Policy Search for Risk-Averse Stochastic Optimization," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 29(2), pages 332-349, May.
    9. Güzin Bayraksan & David P. Morton, 2011. "A Sequential Sampling Procedure for Stochastic Programming," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(4), pages 898-913, August.
    10. Lingyan Cao & Zheng-Feng Guo, 2012. "A Comparison Of Gradient Estimation Techniques For European Call Options," Accounting & Taxation, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 4(1), pages 75-81.
    11. Alfieri, Arianna & Matta, Andrea, 2012. "Mathematical programming formulations for approximate simulation of multistage production systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 219(3), pages 773-783.
    12. Arianna Alfieri & Andrea Matta & Giulia Pedrielli, 2015. "Mathematical programming models for joint simulation–optimization applied to closed queueing networks," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 231(1), pages 105-127, August.
    13. Emelogu, Adindu & Chowdhury, Sudipta & Marufuzzaman, Mohammad & Bian, Linkan & Eksioglu, Burak, 2016. "An enhanced sample average approximation method for stochastic optimization," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 230-252.
    14. Qi Fan & Jiaqiao Hu, 2018. "Surrogate-Based Promising Area Search for Lipschitz Continuous Simulation Optimization," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 30(4), pages 677-693, November.
    15. Jakubik, Johannes & Binding, Adrian & Feuerriegel, Stefan, 2021. "Directed particle swarm optimization with Gaussian-process-based function forecasting," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(1), pages 157-169.
    16. Christophe Gouel & Nicolas Legrand, 2017. "Estimating the Competitive Storage Model with Trending Commodity Prices," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(4), pages 744-763, June.
    17. Zhao, Jake, 2020. "Accounting for the corporate cash increase," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    18. Hannes Schwarz & Valentin Bertsch & Wolf Fichtner, 2018. "Two-stage stochastic, large-scale optimization of a decentralized energy system: a case study focusing on solar PV, heat pumps and storage in a residential quarter," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 40(1), pages 265-310, January.
    19. Stefania Bellavia & Nataša Krejić & Benedetta Morini, 2020. "Inexact restoration with subsampled trust-region methods for finite-sum minimization," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 76(3), pages 701-736, July.
    20. Breitmoser, Yves & Valasek, Justin, 2017. "A rationale for unanimity in committees," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Economics of Change SP II 2017-308, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:64:y:2017:i:4:p:305-322. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6750 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.