IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navres/v56y2009i3p264-278.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A cooperative game in search theory

Author

Listed:
  • Ryusuke Hohzaki

Abstract

Search theory originates from the military research efforts of WWII. Most researchers of that period modeled their search games in noncooperative games, where players are enemies or compete against each other. In this article, we deal with a cooperative search game, where multiple searchers behave cooperatively. First we describe several search problems and discuss the possibility of a coalition or cooperation among searchers. For the cooperative search game, we define a function named quasi‐characteristic function, which gives us a criterion similar to the so‐called characteristic function in the general coalition game with transferable utility. The search operation includes a kind of randomness with respect to whether the searchers can detect a target and get the value of the target. We also propose a methodology to divide the obtained target value among members of the coalition taking account of the randomness. As a concrete problem of the cooperative search game, we take the so‐called search allocation game, where searchers distribute their searching resources to detect a target in a cooperative way and the target moves in a search space to evade the searchers. Lastly, we discuss the core of the cooperative search allocation game. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Naval Research Logistics, 2009

Suggested Citation

  • Ryusuke Hohzaki, 2009. "A cooperative game in search theory," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 56(3), pages 264-278, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:56:y:2009:i:3:p:264-278
    DOI: 10.1002/nav.20338
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.20338
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/nav.20338?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alan R. Washburn, 1980. "Search-Evasion Game in a Fixed Region," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(6), pages 1290-1298, December.
    2. James N. Eagle & Alan R. Washburn, 1991. "Cumulative search‐evasion games," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(4), pages 495-510, August.
    3. John M. Danskin, 1968. "A Helicopter Versus Submarine Search Game," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 16(3), pages 509-517, June.
    4. Bernard O. Koopman, 1957. "The Theory of Search," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 5(5), pages 613-626, October.
    5. Hohzaki, Ryusuke, 2006. "Search allocation game," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 172(1), pages 101-119, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ryusuke Hohzaki, 2008. "A search game taking account of attributes of searching resources," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 55(1), pages 76-90, February.
    2. Ryusuke Hohzaki, 2007. "Discrete search allocation game with false contacts," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(1), pages 46-58, February.
    3. Hohzaki, Ryusuke, 2006. "Search allocation game," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 172(1), pages 101-119, July.
    4. Hohzaki, Ryusuke & Iida, Koji, 2000. "A search game when a search path is given," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(1), pages 114-124, July.
    5. Garrec, Tristan, 2019. "Continuous patrolling and hiding games," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(1), pages 42-51.
    6. Ben Hermans & Roel Leus & Jannik Matuschke, 2022. "Exact and Approximation Algorithms for the Expanding Search Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 281-296, January.
    7. Joseph B. Kadane, 2015. "Optimal discrete search with technological choice," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 81(3), pages 317-336, June.
    8. Joseph Kadane, 2015. "Optimal discrete search with technological choice," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 81(3), pages 317-336, June.
    9. J F J Vermeulen & M van den Brink, 2005. "The search for an alerted moving target," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 56(5), pages 514-525, May.
    10. Gordon McCormick & Guillermo Owen, 2019. "A composite game of hide and seek," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 27(1), pages 1-14, March.
    11. Patriksson, Michael, 2008. "A survey on the continuous nonlinear resource allocation problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 185(1), pages 1-46, February.
    12. Linda V. Green & Peter J. Kolesar, 2004. "ANNIVERSARY ARTICLE: Improving Emergency Responsiveness with Management Science," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(8), pages 1001-1014, August.
    13. Hohzaki, Ryusuke, 2007. "An inspection game with multiple inspectees," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 178(3), pages 894-906, May.
    14. Kyle Y. Lin & Michael P. Atkinson & Kevin D. Glazebrook, 2014. "Optimal patrol to uncover threats in time when detection is imperfect," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 61(8), pages 557-576, December.
    15. Köji Iida, 1989. "Optimal search plan minimizing the expected risk of the search for a target with conditionally deterministic motion," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(5), pages 597-613, October.
    16. Andrey Garnaev & Kensaku Kikuta, 2014. "Screening and hiding versus search," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 80(3), pages 255-265, December.
    17. Hohzaki, Ryusuke & Iida, Koji, 2001. "Optimal ambushing search for a moving target," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 133(1), pages 120-129, August.
    18. Ljiljana Pavlović, 2002. "More on the search for an infiltrator," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 49(1), pages 1-14, February.
    19. Zoroa, N. & Fernández-Sáez, M.J. & Zoroa, P., 2011. "A foraging problem: Sit-and-wait versus active predation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 208(2), pages 131-141, January.
    20. Yu Guo & Yanqing Ye & Qingqing Yang & Kewei Yang, 2019. "A Multi-Objective INLP Model of Sustainable Resource Allocation for Long-Range Maritime Search and Rescue," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-25, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:56:y:2009:i:3:p:264-278. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6750 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.