IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v28y2019i11-12p2253-2264.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors associated with foot ulcer self‐management behaviours among hospitalised patients with diabetes

Author

Listed:
  • Yen‐Fan Chin
  • Tzu‐Ting Huang
  • Brend Ray‐Sea Hsu
  • Li‐Chueh Weng
  • Chih‐Ching Wang

Abstract

Aims and objectives To determine prehospitalised diabetes‐related foot ulcer (DFU) self‐management behaviours and explore the factors associated with these behaviours. Background Although there are many studies that explore DFU prevention and treatment, to our knowledge, there are no quantitative studies of DFU self‐management behaviours. Design Cross‐sectional design. Methods From June 2015–June 2016, 199 hospitalised patients with DFU were given a survey questionnaire at a medical centre in northern Taiwan. DFU self‐management behaviours, diabetes foot self‐care behaviours, beliefs in regard to barriers to DFU self‐management behaviours, and knowledge regarding warning signs of DFU deterioration were assessed by well‐designed measurement tools. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology checklist was used to ensure quality reporting during this observational study (see Supporting Information Appendix S1). Results The results revealed that 62.8% of participants never monitored their blood glucose level when they had foot ulcers, and 63.8% never sought treatment for their wounds when their wounds were not painful. After controlling for demographic and medical variables, stepwise multiple regression analysis revealed that the following eight significant variables were associated with DFU self‐management behaviours: two DFU self‐management barrier beliefs, foot self‐care behaviour, no treatment for diabetes, poor financial status, employment, knowledge regarding the warning signs of DFU deterioration, and number of DFU hospitalisations. Conclusions Diabetes‐related foot ulcer self‐management behaviours were insufficient. Some modifiable factors and high‐risk groups for insufficient DFU self‐management behaviour were identified. Relevance to clinical practice Diabetes‐related foot ulcer self‐management behaviours should be promoted. Interventions that modify the risk factors that were identified in this study can be designed to promote the performance of DFU self‐management behaviours.

Suggested Citation

  • Yen‐Fan Chin & Tzu‐Ting Huang & Brend Ray‐Sea Hsu & Li‐Chueh Weng & Chih‐Ching Wang, 2019. "Factors associated with foot ulcer self‐management behaviours among hospitalised patients with diabetes," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(11-12), pages 2253-2264, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:11-12:p:2253-2264
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14822
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14822
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14822?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yaohui Zhao & Eileen M. Crimmins & Peifeng Hu & Yang Shen & James P. Smith & John Strauss & Yafeng Wang & Yuan Zhang, 2016. "Prevalence, diagnosis, and management of diabetes mellitus among older Chinese: results from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 61(3), pages 347-356, April.
    2. Peter A Lazzarini & Sharon R O’Rourke & Anthony W Russell & Patrick H Derhy & Maarten C Kamp, 2015. "Reduced Incidence of Foot-Related Hospitalisation and Amputation amongst Persons with Diabetes in Queensland, Australia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-18, June.
    3. Yen‐Fan Chin & Tzu‐Ting Huang & Brend Ray‐Sea Hsu, 2013. "Impact of action cues, self‐efficacy and perceived barriers on daily foot exam practice in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with peripheral neuropathy," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(1-2), pages 61-68, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Eun Jo Kim & Kuem‐Sun Han, 2020. "Factors related to self‐care behaviours among patients with diabetic foot ulcers," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(9-10), pages 1712-1722, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hyun‐E Yeom, 2014. "Association among ageing‐related stereotypic beliefs, self‐efficacy and health‐promoting behaviors in elderly Korean adults," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(9-10), pages 1365-1373, May.
    2. Ding, Hui & Chen, Yiwei & Yu, Min & Zhong, Jieming & Hu, Ruying & Chen, Xiangyu & Wang, Chunmei & Xie, Kaixu & Eggleston, Karen, 2021. "The Effects of Chronic Disease Management in Primary Health Care: Evidence from Rural China," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    3. Xin Wang & Kuimeng Song & Paiyi Zhu & Pim Valentijn & Yixiang Huang & Stephen Birch, 2019. "How Do Type 2 Diabetes Patients Value Urban Integrated Primary Care in China? Results of a Discrete Choice Experiment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-12, December.
    4. Xiaoxue Liu & Chuanhua Yu & Yongbo Wang & Yongyi Bi & Yu Liu & Zhi-Jiang Zhang, 2019. "Trends in the Incidence and Mortality of Diabetes in China from 1990 to 2017: A Joinpoint and Age-Period-Cohort Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-14, January.
    5. Wei Zheng & Zining Liu & Ruo Jia, 2019. "How private sector participation improves retirement preparation: A case from China," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 44(1), pages 123-147, January.
    6. Lin, Zhuoer & Chen, Xi, 2022. "Long-term services and supports and disease management among older Chinese adults in different stages of cognitive impairment," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Elsevier, vol. 23(C).
    7. Jesse Pocuis & Sam Man-Hoi Li & Mary M. Janci & Hilaire J. Thompson, 2017. "Exploring Diabetic Foot Exam Performance in a Specialty Clinic," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 26(1), pages 82-92, February.
    8. Lin, Zhuoer & Chen, Xi, 2021. "Adverse Childhood Circumstances and Cognitive Function in Middle-aged and Older Chinese Adults: Lower Level or Faster Decline?," GLO Discussion Paper Series 794, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    9. Yiwei Chen & Hui Ding & Min Yu & Jieming Zhong & Ruying Hu & Xiangyu Chen & Chunmei Wang & Kaixu Xie & Karen Eggleston, 2019. "The Effects of Primary Care Chronic-Disease Management in Rural China," NBER Working Papers 26100, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Tianrong Ma & Tingting Liu & Dongmei Wu & Changwei Li, 2019. "Hand Grip Strength And Peak Expiratory Flow Among Individuals With Diabetes: Findings From the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study Baseline Survey," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 28(4), pages 502-520, May.
    11. Yuan S. Zhang & Eileen M. Crimmins, 2019. "Urban–rural differentials in age-related biological risk among middle-aged and older Chinese," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 64(6), pages 831-839, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:11-12:p:2253-2264. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.