IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i7-8pe1402-e1411.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Emergency department waiting room nurses in practice: An observational study

Author

Listed:
  • Kelli Innes
  • Doug Elliott
  • Virginia Plummer
  • Debra Jackson

Abstract

Aims and objectives To identify the activities and behaviours of waiting room nurses in emergency department settings. Background Emergency care has expanded into waiting rooms in some emergency departments. Often viewed as an adjunct to triage, the aim of waiting room nurses is to commence care early, reassess patients and improve communication between patients, families and staff. There is however a paucity of literature relating to waiting room nurses, especially in relation to their current activities and behaviours. Design and methods Part of a larger exploratory sequential mixed methods designed study. This phase used a nonparticipant observer role to observe waiting room nurses in their natural setting undertaking normal care and responsibilities. One observer, using a tool and reflective journal, collected data on participant interactions, processes and practices on eight waiting room nurses over 13 episodes of observation (total 65 hr:50 min) in two emergency departments. Data analysis used descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. Results Participants were observed to anticipate and prioritise to deliver holistic, patient‐centred care in emergency department waiting rooms. Waiting room nurses had a varied and unpredictable workload, including facilitating the flow of patients from the waiting room. They contributed to patient safety in the waiting room, primarily by reassessing and detecting clinical deterioration. Conclusion Further research into this role is required, including linking efficacy with experience of nurses, impact the role has on patient safety, and patient and family perceptions of the role. Relevance to clinical practice Therapeutic engagement allowed waiting room nurses to reassure and calm patients and families, and deliver holistic, patient‐centred care. Waiting room nurses contributed to patient safety in the waiting room, by promptly commencing episodes of care in the waiting room and through close monitoring and assessment to detect patient deterioration.

Suggested Citation

  • Kelli Innes & Doug Elliott & Virginia Plummer & Debra Jackson, 2018. "Emergency department waiting room nurses in practice: An observational study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(7-8), pages 1402-1411, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:7-8:p:e1402-e1411
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14240
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14240
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14240?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Klara Friberg & Sissel Eikeland Husebø & Øystein Evjen Olsen & Britt Sætre Hansen, 2016. "Interprofessional trust in emergency department – as experienced by nurses in charge and doctors on call," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(21-22), pages 3252-3260, November.
    2. Murphy, Elizabeth & Dingwall, Robert, 2007. "Informed consent, anticipatory regulation and ethnographic practice," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(11), pages 2223-2234, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohajan, Haradhan, 2020. "Quantitative Research: A Successful Investigation in Natural and Social Sciences," MPRA Paper 105149, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 15 Nov 2020.
    2. Swallow, Julia, 2017. "Expectant futures and an early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: Knowing and its consequences," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 57-64.
    3. Guta, Adrian & Nixon, Stephanie A. & Wilson, Michael G., 2013. "Resisting the seduction of “ethics creep”: Using Foucault to surface complexity and contradiction in research ethics review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 301-310.
    4. Virginia Mapedzahama & Tinashe Dune, 2017. "A Clash of Paradigms? Ethnography and Ethics Approval," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(1), pages 21582440176, March.
    5. Janet Boddy, 2014. "Research across cultures, within countries: Hidden ethics tensions in research with children and families?," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 14(1), pages 91-103, January.
    6. Natalie Pattison & Jude Mclellan & Lara Roskelly & Kirsty McLeod & Theresa Wiseman, 2018. "Managing clinical uncertainty: An ethnographic study of the impact of critical care outreach on end‐of‐life transitions in ward‐based critically ill patients with a life‐limiting illness," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(21-22), pages 3900-3912, November.
    7. Burgess, Michael M., 2007. "Proposing modesty for informed consent," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(11), pages 2284-2295, December.
    8. Melissa J. Bloomer & Wendy Cross & Ruth Endacott & Margaret O'Connor & Cheryle Moss, 2012. "Qualitative observation in a clinical setting: Challenges at end of life," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(1), pages 25-31, March.
    9. Melissa J. Bloomer & Maggie Doman & Ruth Endacott, 2013. "How the observed create ethical dilemmas for the observers: Experiences from studies conducted in clinical settings in the UK and Australia," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(4), pages 410-414, December.
    10. Philippe Robert-Demontrond & Amélie Bellion, 2016. "L'éthique en ethnomarketing : de la juridictionnalisation des recherches à une morale incarnée," Post-Print hal-01865104, HAL.
    11. Parker, Michael, 2007. "Ethnography/ethics," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(11), pages 2248-2259, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:7-8:p:e1402-e1411. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.