IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/amposc/v47y2003i1p1-17.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Thomas Jefferson's Liberal Anticapitalism

Author

Listed:
  • Claudio J. Katz

Abstract

This article reassesses Thomas Jefferson's political economy in light of debates about the influence of liberal and republican ideas on his thought. I argue that Jefferson embraced liberal premises, but used them to reach anticapitalist conclusions. He opposed neither commerce nor the prosperity it promised; he opposed working for a wage, and he did so on liberal grounds. The first section of this article shows that John Locke's theory of property turns on the justification of capitalist labor relations. The second section establishes, first, that Locke's argument played a decisive role in the development of Jefferson's own and, second, that Jefferson redefined its terms to fashion a forceful critique of wage labor. An examination of Jefferson's writings elucidates a neglected variant of the liberal tradition, prevalent in the United States until the Populist agitation. Its core is the stigma attached to working for hire as a diminished form of liberty, tantamount to wage slavery.

Suggested Citation

  • Claudio J. Katz, 2003. "Thomas Jefferson's Liberal Anticapitalism," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 47(1), pages 1-17, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:amposc:v:47:y:2003:i:1:p:1-17
    DOI: 10.1111/1540-5907.00001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5907.00001
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1540-5907.00001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sreenivasan, Gopal, 1995. "The Limits of Lockean Rights in Property," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780195091762.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Creutzig, Felix, 2020. "Limits to Liberalism: Considerations for the Anthropocene," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    2. B. Jeffrey Reno, 2009. "Private Property and the Law of Nature in Locke's Two Treatises: The Best Advantage of Life and Convenience," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 68(3), pages 639-663, July.
    3. Margaret Schabas, 2015. "John Stuart Mill: evolutionary economics and liberalism," Journal of Bioeconomics, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 97-111, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:amposc:v:47:y:2003:i:1:p:1-17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1540-5907 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.