IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/organi/v41y2008i6p218-225n3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Accounting Treatment of Goodwill in IFRS and US GAAP

Author

Listed:
  • Jerman Mateja
  • Manzin Massimo

    (Faculty of Management, University of Primorska, Cankarjeva 5, 6000 Koper, Slovenia)

Abstract

The article presents an overview of the new accounting treatment of goodwill regarding International Financial Reporting Standards and American Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. Goodwill acquired through a business combination is no longer amortized but tested for impairment. Despite the fact that the objective of the new International Financial Accounting Standard has been to move towards international convergence; significant differences between standards still exist. The article presents the main changes of the regulation in the last years and the key differences between the two accounting treatments. In spite of the new accounting approach there are still lots of discussions, which indicate that the field is still not properly regulated. Finally, the article offers possible directions for future research and reporting practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Jerman Mateja & Manzin Massimo, 2008. "Accounting Treatment of Goodwill in IFRS and US GAAP," Organizacija, Sciendo, vol. 41(6), pages 218-225, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:organi:v:41:y:2008:i:6:p:218-225:n:3
    DOI: 10.2478/v10051-008-0023-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10051-008-0023-5
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/v10051-008-0023-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Suzanne Sevin & Richard Schroeder & Sak Bhamornsiri, 2007. "Transparent financial disclosure and SFAS No. 142," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 22(7), pages 674-687, July.
    2. Wolfgang Schultze, 2005. "The Information Content of Goodwill-Impairments under FAS 142: Implications for External Analysis and Internal Control," Schmalenbach Business Review (sbr), LMU Munich School of Management, vol. 57(3), pages 276-297, July.
    3. Gerald Lander & Alan Reinstein, 2003. "Models to measure goodwill impairment," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 9(3), pages 227-232, August.
    4. Daniel A. Bens, 2006. "Discussion of Accounting Discretion in Fair Value Estimates: An Examination of SFAS 142 Goodwill Impairments," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(2), pages 289-296, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Igor Stubelj, 2010. "Valuation of Slovene Publicly Traded Companies with a Valuation Model Based on Expected Earnings and Growth Opportunities," Managing Global Transitions, University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper, vol. 8(1), pages 023-047.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Edwin Quinn Jr., 2014. "The Challenges for Establishing the Convergence of Accounting Reporting Among Different Countries," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 4(2), pages 144-151, April.
    2. Kevin K. Li & Richard G. Sloan, 2017. "Has goodwill accounting gone bad?," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 964-1003, June.
    3. Tami Dinh Thi & Wolfgang Schultze, 2011. "Capitalizing research & development and ‘other information’: the incremental information content of accruals versus cash flows," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 241-278, November.
    4. Ding, Yuan & Richard, Jacques & Stolowy, Hervé, 2008. "Towards an understanding of the phases of goodwill accounting in four Western capitalist countries: From stakeholder model to shareholder model," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 33(7-8), pages 718-755.
    5. Carla Carvalho & Ana Maria Rodrigues & Carlos Ferreira, 2016. "The Recognition of Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets in Business Combinations – The Portuguese Case," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 26(1), pages 4-20, March.
    6. Jean-Michel Sahut & Sandrine Boulerne, 2008. "Les normes IFRS ont-elles améliorées le contenu informationnel des immatériels ? : le cas des entreprises françaises cotées," Post-Print halshs-00525967, HAL.
    7. Ross Taplin & Yafang Zhao & Alistair Brown, 2014. "Failure of auditors: The lack of compliance for business combinations in China," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(3), pages 310-331, September.
    8. Tadeusz Dudycz & Jadwiga Praźników, 2020. "Does the Mark-to-Model Fair Value Measure Make Assets Impairment Noisy?: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-24, February.
    9. Andreas Haaker, 2007. "Wertorientierte Kontrolle und Abweichungsanalyse auf Basis des Goodwill-Impairment-Tests nach IFRS," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 83-108, April.
    10. Jayne M. Godfrey & Ping‐Sheng Koh, 2009. "Goodwill impairment as a reflection of investment opportunities," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 49(1), pages 117-140, March.
    11. Wolfgang Schultze & Andreas Weiler, 2007. "Performancemessung und Wertgenerierung: Entlohnung auf Basis des Residualen Ökonomischen Gewinns," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 133-159, August.
    12. Wolfgang Schultze & Martin Meyer, 2005. "Die Kapitalflussrechnung in der Unternehmensbewertung: Bewertungskalkül und Gestaltungshinweise," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 289-324, September.
    13. Jean-Michael Sahut & Sandrine Boulerne, 2010. "Have Ias (International Accounting Standards)/Ifrs Improved The Information Content Of Intangibles In France ?," Post-Print hal-02104906, HAL.
    14. Klaus Trützschler & Ulrich David & Joachim Strauch & Claude Tomaszewski, 2005. "Unternehmensbewertung und rechnungslegung von akquisitionen: Die vorschriften nach IFRS und HGB vs. betriebswirtschaftliche rationalität," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 383-406, December.
    15. Jean‐Michel Sahut & Sandrine Boulerne & Frédéric Teulon, 2011. "Do IFRS provide better information about intangibles in Europe?," Review of Accounting and Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 10(3), pages 267-290, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:organi:v:41:y:2008:i:6:p:218-225:n:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.