IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/joheec/v2y2015i2p93-112n1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Post-War Czechoslovakia: A Theoretical Critique

Author

Listed:
  • Nikodym Tomáš

    (Department of Economic History; Faculty of Economic; University of Economics, Prague; Winston Churchill Sq. 4, 130 67 Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Nikodym Lukáš

    (Department of Economic History; Faculty of Economic; University of Economics, Prague)

  • Pušová Tereza

    (Department of Economic History; Faculty of Economic; University of Economics, Prague)

Abstract

The paper focuses on the proposals of post-war order in Czechoslovakia and its theoretical analysis. While there exists a wide range of studies, both Czech and foreign, dedicated to the history of Czechoslovakia in the post-war period, a majority of the studies deals with political development. Then the interpretations of the failure of President Beneš’ “distinct model of socialism” are purely political – weakness of President Beneš and democratic elites, the aggressive politics of Communist party, influence of Soviet diplomacy, etc. On the other hand, economic studies are only descriptive without theoretical analysis of proposed post-war order. Our paper offers different interpretation of the fall of Czechoslovak democratic regime (1945–1948). Using the framework of Austrian school, we are trying to show the institutional incompatibility of proposed post-war order. Special emphasis is put on the relation of freedom, democracy and socialist economic planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Nikodym Tomáš & Nikodym Lukáš & Pušová Tereza, 2015. "Post-War Czechoslovakia: A Theoretical Critique," Journal of Heterodox Economics, Sciendo, vol. 2(2), pages 93-112, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:joheec:v:2:y:2015:i:2:p:93-112:n:1
    DOI: 10.1515/jheec-2015-0014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/jheec-2015-0014
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/jheec-2015-0014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shruti Rajagopalan, 2015. "Incompatible institutions: socialism versus constitutionalism in India," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 328-355, September.
    2. Samuel DeCanio, 2014. "Democracy, the Market, and the Logic of Social Choice," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 58(3), pages 637-652, July.
    3. Frank H. Knight, 1938. "Lippmann's The Good Society," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 46(6), pages 864-864.
    4. Segal, Jacob, 2003. "Freedom and Normalization: Poststructuralism and the Liberalism of Michael Oakeshott," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 97(3), pages 447-458, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Malte Dold & Tim Krieger, 2019. "The “New” Crisis of the Liberal Order: Populism, Socioeconomic Imbalances, and the Response of Contemporary Ordoliberalism," Journal of Contextual Economics (JCE) – Schmollers Jahrbuch, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, vol. 139(2–4), pages 243-258.
    2. Shruti Rajagopalan & Alex Tabarrok, 2021. "Simple rules for the developing world," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 52(2), pages 341-362, December.
    3. Skarbek, David, 2016. "Covenants without the Sword? Comparing Prison Self-Governance Globally," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 110(4), pages 845-862, November.
    4. Sato, Hajime, 2017. "The Universality, Peculiarity, and Sustainability of Indian Public Interest Litigation Reconsidered," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 59-68.
    5. Shruti Rajagopalan, 2023. "Mises's dynamics of interventionism: Lessons from Indian agriculture," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 89(3), pages 657-679, January.
    6. Palagashvili,Liya & Piano,Ennio & Skarbek,David, 2017. "The Decline and Rise of Institutions," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781316649176.
    7. Art Carden, 2023. "Economic planning must be polycentric, not monocentric: Introduction to a symposium on Mises and Hayek on socialism and knowledge," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 89(3), pages 647-656, January.
    8. G. P. Manish & Shruti Rajagopalan & Daniel Sutter & Lawrence H. White, 2015. "Liberalism in India," Econ Journal Watch, Econ Journal Watch, vol. 12(3), pages 432–459-4, September.
    9. Cristina Bicchieri, 2002. "Covenants without Swords," Rationality and Society, , vol. 14(2), pages 192-228, May.
    10. Abishek Choutagunta & G. P. Manish & Shruti Rajagopalan, 2021. "Battling COVID‐19 with dysfunctional federalism: Lessons from India," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 87(4), pages 1267-1299, April.
    11. ., 2019. "Economic theory of non-territorial unbundling," Chapters, in: The Political Economy of Non-Territorial Exit, chapter 1, pages 14-38, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    12. Richard Boyd, 2004. "Michael Oakeshott on Civility, Civil Society and Civil Association," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 52(3), pages 603-622, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    democracy; economic planning; Czechoslovakia; post-war order;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B13 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought through 1925 - - - Neoclassical through 1925 (Austrian, Marshallian, Walrasian, Wicksellian)
    • N44 - Economic History - - Government, War, Law, International Relations, and Regulation - - - Europe: 1913-
    • P21 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Socialist and Transition Economies - - - Planning, Coordination, and Reform

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:joheec:v:2:y:2015:i:2:p:93-112:n:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.