IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/jecman/v38y2019i4p89-106n7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measurement of entropy in the assessment of homogeneity of areas valued with the Szczecin Algorithm of Real Estate Mass Appraisal

Author

Listed:
  • Gnat Sebastian

    (Institute of Econometrics and Statistics, Faculty of Economics and Management, University of Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland)

Abstract

Aim/purpose – General real estate taxation is a process regulated, inter alia, by the Real Estate Management Act. It is intended to establish a tax base for real estate in the event of a change in real estate tax base. General taxation is one of several applications of mass valuation of real estate, which enables valuation of many properties at the same time and with a uniform approach. One of the methods of mass valuation of real estate already applied in practice is the Szczecin Algorithm of Real Estate of Mass Appraisal (SAREMA). One of the immanent features of general taxation and the algorithm itself is the division of a selected area into possibly homogeneous areas called taxing zones within the general taxation terminology and, more broadly, elementary areas, according to the nomenclature used in the SAREMA. The paper presents the results of the studies on the measurement of elementary areas homogeneity on the example of land plots located in Szczecin. It is important to assess whether the designated sub-areas of valuation cover properties similar to each other in terms of their specific characteristics. If so, it will help to obtain more accurate mass valuation results.

Suggested Citation

  • Gnat Sebastian, 2019. "Measurement of entropy in the assessment of homogeneity of areas valued with the Szczecin Algorithm of Real Estate Mass Appraisal," Journal of Economics and Management, Sciendo, vol. 38(4), pages 89-106, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:jecman:v:38:y:2019:i:4:p:89-106:n:7
    DOI: 10.22367/jem.2019.38.05
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.22367/jem.2019.38.05
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22367/jem.2019.38.05?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alasdair Rae, 2015. "Online Housing Search and the Geography of Submarkets," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(3), pages 453-472, June.
    2. Liang Peng & Thomas Thibodeau, 2013. "Risk Segmentation of American Homes: Evidence from Denver," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 41(3), pages 569-599, September.
    3. Czyż Teresa & Hauke Jan, 2015. "Entropy In Regional Analysis," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 34(4), pages 69-78, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Berna Keskin & Craig Watkins, 2017. "Defining spatial housing submarkets: Exploring the case for expert delineated boundaries," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(6), pages 1446-1462, May.
    2. Hozer Józef & Gnat Sebastian & Kokot Sebastian & Kuźmiński Wojciech, 2019. "The Problem of Designating Elementary Terrains for the Purpose of Szczecin Algorithm of Real Estate Mass Appraisal," Real Estate Management and Valuation, Sciendo, vol. 27(3), pages 42-58, September.
    3. Daniel A. Griffith & Yongwan Chun & Jan Hauke, 2022. "A Moran eigenvector spatial filtering specification of entropy measures," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 101(1), pages 259-279, February.
    4. Liang Peng & Lei Zhang, 2021. "House Prices and Systematic Risk: Evidence from Microdata," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 49(4), pages 1069-1092, December.
    5. Geoff Boeing, 2020. "Online rental housing market representation and the digital reproduction of urban inequality," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(2), pages 449-468, March.
    6. Liang Peng, 2020. "Benchmarking Local Commercial Real Estate Returns: Statistics Meets Economics," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 48(4), pages 1004-1029, December.
    7. Brent C Smith & Kenneth N. Daniels, 2018. "Unintended Consequences of Risk Based Pricing: Racial Differences in Mortgage Costs," Journal of Financial Services Research, Springer;Western Finance Association, vol. 54(3), pages 323-343, December.
    8. Peter Chinloy & William D. Larson, 2017. "The Daily Microstructure of the Housing Market," FHFA Staff Working Papers 17-01, Federal Housing Finance Agency.
    9. Hill, Robert J. & Syed, Iqbal A., 2016. "Hedonic price–rent ratios, user cost, and departures from equilibrium in the housing market," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 60-72.
    10. Geoff Boeing & Max Besbris & Ariela Schachter & John Kuk, 2021. "Housing Search in the Age of Big Data: Smarter Cities or the Same Old Blind Spots?," Housing Policy Debate, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(1), pages 112-126, January.
    11. Waltl, Sofie R., 2018. "Estimating quantile-specific rental yields for residential housing in Sydney," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 204-225.
    12. Mayock, Tom & Malacrida, Rachel Spritzer, 2018. "Socioeconomic and racial disparities in the financial returns to homeownership," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 80-96.
    13. Julia Gabriele Harten & Annette M Kim & J Cressica Brazier, 2021. "Real and fake data in Shanghai’s informal rental housing market: Groundtruthing data scraped from the internet," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(9), pages 1831-1845, July.
    14. Li, Qiang & Nong, Huifu, 2022. "A closer look at Chinese housing market: Measuring intra-city submarket connectedness in Shanghai and Guangzhou," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    15. Michał Banaszak & Michał Dziecielski & Peter Nijkamp & Waldemar Ratajczak, 2019. "Geography in motion: Hexagonal spatial systems in fuzzy gravitation," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 51(2), pages 393-402, March.
    16. Joep Steegmans & Jonathan de Bruin, 2021. "Online housing search: A gravity model approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-31, March.
    17. Jianhua Gang & Liang Peng & Jinfan Zhang, 2021. "Are Pricier Houses Less Risky? Evidence from China," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 63(4), pages 662-677, November.
    18. J.W.A.M. Steegmans & Jonathan de Bruin, 2019. "Online housing search and gravity models," Working Papers 19-17, Utrecht School of Economics.
    19. Saurabh Mishra & Bilal M. Ayyub, 2019. "Shannon Entropy for Quantifying Uncertainty and Risk in Economic Disparity," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(10), pages 2160-2181, October.
    20. Renigier-Biłozor, Małgorzata & Janowski, Artur & Walacik, Marek & Chmielewska, Aneta, 2022. "Modern challenges of property market analysis- homogeneous areas determination," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    property mass valuation; entropy; property market analysis;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C51 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Model Construction and Estimation
    • R52 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis - - - Land Use and Other Regulations

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:jecman:v:38:y:2019:i:4:p:89-106:n:7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.