IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/eurcou/v11y2019i3p317-340n5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Land-Use Change Related to Topography and Societal Drivers in High-Mountains – A Case Study in the Upper Watershed of the Tergi (Kazbegi Region), Greater Caucasus

Author

Listed:
  • Theissen Tim
  • Otte Annette
  • Waldhardt Rainer

    (Center for International Development and Environmental Research (ZEU), Justus Liebig UniversityGiessen, Germany, Division of Landscape Ecology and Landscape Planning, Institute of Landscape Ecology and Resources Management, Justus Liebig UniversityGiessen, Germany.)

Abstract

High mountain ecosystems, with strong topographic and climatic gradients, are fragile and particularly sensitive to changes in land use. The abandonment of historic cultural landscapes has often led to changes in the pattern of land cover and thus, to a shift in the functions of high mountain landscapes, like fresh water supply, productivity or erosion control. In order to understand the effects of land-use change on the land-cover pattern at the local and regional scale, we analyzed and classified the mountainous landscape structure in the Kazbegi region in Georgia, located in the Central Greater Caucasus. For 13 settlements, we determined the land cover as present in 1987 and 2015, and quantified the changes over time to detect land-cover development trends for each settlement. Using a cluster analysis, the study area was analyzed regarding to topography (altitude, aspect, slope) and distance to settlements at the regional scale to gain six groups with separating conditions. Furthermore, each settlement was classified according to topography and land-cover change to obtain site-specific, comparative development trends. Our results show that this Caucasian high-mountain landscape is characterized by open grassland (67%) used as pasture and hay meadow, and natural birch forests (7%) in patches in the upper half of the subalpine belt. Within the settlements but also in their surroundings, field vegetables are cultivated in home gardens (1%). Land-cover change during the observation period mainly affected the cultural grassland with hay meadow abandonment. Moreover, shrubbery and forest expanded considerably on abandoned pastures. We further detected a strong relationship to topography that considerably varied between settlements resulting in specific trends in land-use change. Hay-making and arable land cultivation are focused today on sun-exposed and gentle slopes near the settlements. Shrub encroachment and reforestations were localized on farther distances and mostly on north-exposed slopes. Besides providing basic information about the historic and current land-use and land-cover patterns, our results quantify the landscape change during almost 30 years. A spatio-temporal analysis revealed an understanding of how land-use decisions influence the landscape pattern. In the context of societal development, regional socioeconomic processes, like shifts in the agricultural structure and population outmigration, seem to be societal drivers of changes. Our findings reveal linkages and interrelationships between natural, human-induced environmental and socioeconomic processes within high-mountain socio-ecological systems. Moreover, we suggest that sustainable land-use strategies for spatial development on sub-regional level, especially in marginal high-mountain regions, should consider topography and its influence on land-use change.

Suggested Citation

  • Theissen Tim & Otte Annette & Waldhardt Rainer, 2019. "Land-Use Change Related to Topography and Societal Drivers in High-Mountains – A Case Study in the Upper Watershed of the Tergi (Kazbegi Region), Greater Caucasus," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 11(3), pages 317-340, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:eurcou:v:11:y:2019:i:3:p:317-340:n:5
    DOI: 10.2478/euco-2019-0020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/euco-2019-0020
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/euco-2019-0020?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Norman Myers & Russell A. Mittermeier & Cristina G. Mittermeier & Gustavo A. B. da Fonseca & Jennifer Kent, 2000. "Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities," Nature, Nature, vol. 403(6772), pages 853-858, February.
    2. Roger Shepard, 1962. "The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function. I," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 27(2), pages 125-140, June.
    3. Oedl-Wieser, Theresia & Dax, Thomas & Fischer, Michael, 2017. "A new approach for participative rural development in Georgia – reflecting transfer of knowledge and enhancing innovation in a non-European Union context," Studies in Agricultural Economics, Research Institute for Agricultural Economics, vol. 119(1), April.
    4. Jennifer Alix-Garcia & Tobias Kuemmerl & Volker C. Radeloff, 2012. "Prices, Land Tenure Institutions, and Geography: A Matching Analysis of Farmland Abandonment in Post-Socialist Eastern Europe," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 88(3), pages 425-443.
    5. Roger Shepard, 1962. "The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function. II," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 27(3), pages 219-246, September.
    6. Stanley Fischer & Alan Gelb, 1991. "The Process of Socialist Economic Transformation," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 5(4), pages 91-105, Fall.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tim Theissen & Annette Otte & Rainer Waldhardt, 2022. "High-Mountain Landscape Classification to Analyze Patterns of Land Use and Potential Natural Vegetation," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-20, July.
    2. Roger Shepard, 1974. "Representation of structure in similarity data: Problems and prospects," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 39(4), pages 373-421, December.
    3. la Grange, Anthony & le Roux, Niël & Gardner-Lubbe, Sugnet, 2009. "BiplotGUI: Interactive Biplots in R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 30(i12).
    4. Venera Tomaselli, 1996. "Multivariate statistical techniques and sociological research," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 253-276, August.
    5. Bijmolt, T.H.A. & Wedel, M., 1996. "A Monte Carlo Evaluation of Maximum Likelihood Multidimensional Scaling Methods," Other publications TiSEM f72cc9d8-f370-43aa-a224-4, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    6. Phipps Arabie & J. Carroll, 1980. "Mapclus: A mathematical programming approach to fitting the adclus model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 45(2), pages 211-235, June.
    7. Yoshio Takane & Forrest Young & Jan Leeuw, 1977. "Nonmetric individual differences multidimensional scaling: An alternating least squares method with optimal scaling features," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 42(1), pages 7-67, March.
    8. Karim Abou-Moustafa & Frank P. Ferrie, 2018. "Local generalized quadratic distance metrics: application to the k-nearest neighbors classifier," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 12(2), pages 341-363, June.
    9. M. Keshavarzi & M. A. Dehghan & M. Mashinchi, 2012. "Applications of classification based on similarities and dissimilarities," Fuzzy Information and Engineering, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 75-91, March.
    10. Dionisios Koutsantonis & Konstantinos Koutsantonis & Nikolaos P. Bakas & Vagelis Plevris & Andreas Langousis & Savvas A. Chatzichristofis, 2022. "Bibliometric Literature Review of Adaptive Learning Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-18, October.
    11. Henry Brady, 1989. "Factor and ideal point analysis for interpersonally incomparable data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 54(2), pages 181-202, June.
    12. Stephen Johnson, 1967. "Hierarchical clustering schemes," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 32(3), pages 241-254, September.
    13. Maital, Shlomo, 1976. "Multidimensional Scaling: Some Economic Applications," Foerder Institute for Economic Research Working Papers 275316, Tel-Aviv University > Foerder Institute for Economic Research.
    14. Fernández, Xosé Luis & Coto-Millán, Pablo & Díaz-Medina, Benito, 2018. "The impact of tourism on airport efficiency: The Spanish case," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 52-58.
    15. Morales José F. & Song Tingting & Auerbach Arleen D. & Wittkowski Knut M., 2008. "Phenotyping Genetic Diseases Using an Extension of µ-Scores for Multivariate Data," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 7(1), pages 1-20, June.
    16. J. Kruskal, 1964. "Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: A numerical method," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 29(2), pages 115-129, June.
    17. Roger Girard & Norman Cliff, 1976. "A monte carlo evaluation of interactive multidimensional scaling," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 41(1), pages 43-64, March.
    18. Lyle Jones, 1963. "Beyond Babbage," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 28(4), pages 315-331, December.
    19. Karen E. Kirkhart & Robert O. Morgan, 1986. "Evaluation in Mental Health Centers," Evaluation Review, , vol. 10(1), pages 127-141, February.
    20. Lopes, António M. & Machado, J.A. Tenreiro, 2017. "Computational comparison and pattern visualization of forest fires," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 407-413.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:eurcou:v:11:y:2019:i:3:p:317-340:n:5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.