IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/cejopp/v14y2020i1p31-42n2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Corporate volunteering in the large enterprises’ social mission – the case of a post-Soviet Russian industrial region

Author

Listed:
  • Pevnaya Maria

    (Ural Federal University, Yekaterinburg, Russia)

  • Cernicova-Buca Mariana

    (Politehnica University Timisoara, Romania)

Abstract

The paper focuses on the main features of corporate volunteering in companies from the Sverdlovsk region (Russian Federation), with a population surpassing 4.5 million inhabitants. Corporate volunteering is analyzed in the context of the trend characteristic for the post-Soviet space. The article systematizes approaches to the definition and study of this phenomenon, implemented by researchers from different countries. The main goal of the article is to identify the specific features of corporate volunteering in a large Russian region, considered typical for industrial territories in post-Soviet areas, seen through the social value that local communities attribute to corporate volunteering. The paper is based on the results of a public opinion poll and structured interviews, carried out in the Sverdlovsk region, where there is a concentration of enterprises of “hard” industries. The responses obtained in the poll were further subjected to analysis using statistical methods. The data are supplemented with information collected through the qualitative interviews. Interviewed experts are the top managers of enterprises and the deputy directors for HR, GR, or social issues. The study shows that in Russian industrial cities, where large enterprises are the main employers for most residents, many questions on the implementation of social policy fall under the responsibility of these enterprises, and not of the local government. Researchers argue that corporate volunteering is not widespread in the large Russian regions. It most often develops within the framework of event planning and environmental projects, managed by enterprises in cooperation with social and cultural institutions of local communities and not with the non-profit sector. The traditions of the organization of mass social work formed during the socialist period are still deeply rooted in enterprises, and managers rarely identify volunteering as a new managerial tool, thus being untangled from the global trend of promoting corporate volunteerism as a means of building corporate culture.

Suggested Citation

  • Pevnaya Maria & Cernicova-Buca Mariana, 2020. "Corporate volunteering in the large enterprises’ social mission – the case of a post-Soviet Russian industrial region," Central European Journal of Public Policy, Sciendo, vol. 14(1), pages 31-42, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:cejopp:v:14:y:2020:i:1:p:31-42:n:2
    DOI: 10.2478/cejpp-2020-0001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/cejpp-2020-0001
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/cejpp-2020-0001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ciprian Obrad & Vasile Gherheș, 2018. "A Human Resources Perspective on Responsible Corporate Behavior. Case Study: The Multinational Companies in Western Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-15, March.
    2. Gatignon-Turnau, Anne-Laure & Mignonac, Karim, 2015. "(Mis)Using employee volunteering for public relations: Implications for corporate volunteers' organizational commitment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(1), pages 7-18.
    3. Mary Runte & Debra Z. Basil, 2011. "Personal and corporate volunteerism: employee motivations," International Journal of Business Environment, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(2), pages 133-145.
    4. Debbie Haski-Leventhal & Lonneke Roza & Lucas C. P. M. Meijs, 2017. "Congruence in Corporate Social Responsibility: Connecting the Identity and Behavior of Employers and Employees," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 143(1), pages 35-51, June.
    5. Srinivasan Sekar & Lata Dyaram, 2017. "What drives employees to participate in corporate volunteering programs?," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 13(4), pages 661-677, October.
    6. Anne-Laure Gatignon Turnau & Karim Mignonac, 2015. "(Mis)Using employee volunteering for public relations: Implications for corporate volunteers' organizational commitment," Post-Print hal-01259952, HAL.
    7. Lonneke Roza & Itamar Shachar & Lucas Meijs & Lesley Hustinx, 2017. "The nonprofit case for corporate volunteering: a multi-level perspective," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(11-12), pages 746-765, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aldona Glińska-Neweś & Joanna Górka, 2020. "Capabilities of Corporate Volunteering in Strengthening Social Capital," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-11, September.
    2. Seunghee Im & Yang Woon Chung & Ji Yeon Yang, 2018. "The Mediating Roles of Happiness and Cohesion in the Relationship between Employee Volunteerism and Job Performance," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-13, December.
    3. Sajjad A. Afridi & Bilal Afsar & Asad Shahjehan & Zia U. Rehman & Maqsood Haider & Mehboob Ullah, 2020. "Retracted: Perceived corporate social responsibility and innovative work behavior: The role of employee volunteerism and authenticity," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 1865-1877, July.
    4. Zhe Zhang & Juan Wang & Ming Jia, 2022. "Multilevel Examination of How and When Socially Responsible Human Resource Management Improves the Well-Being of Employees," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 176(1), pages 55-71, February.
    5. Seunghee Im & Yang Woon Chung, 2018. "Employee Volunteering Meaningfulness and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Exploring the Effects of Organizational Support, Pride, and Trust," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-16, December.
    6. Sohier, Alice & Sohier, Romain & Chaney, Damien, 2023. "When volunteers are also consumers: Exploring volunteers’ co-consumption experience in leisure contexts," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    7. Chia-Lee Yang & Ming-Chang Shieh & Chi-Yo Huang & Ching-Pin Tung, 2018. "A Derivation of Factors Influencing the Successful Integration of Corporate Volunteers into Public Flood Disaster Inquiry and Notification Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-31, June.
    8. Kofi Mintah Oware & Francis Donkor, 2023. "Does the Practice of Employee Volunteerism Affect Workforce Reduction and Defective Product Issues? Evidence from India," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 1369-1383, December.
    9. Oscar Licandro & Stefanía Yapor & Patricia Correa, 2022. "Analysis of the personal factors of the volunteers as mediators between the satisfaction and the permanence in employee volunteering," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 19(1), pages 127-151, March.
    10. Akram Hatami & Jan Hermes & Anne Keränen & Pauliina Ulkuniemi, 2023. "Creating Social Sustainability Through Distributing Leadership and Co-Responsibility in Corporate Volunteering," South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases, , vol. 12(1), pages 81-96, April.
    11. Tri Legionosuko & Mhd Halkis, 2021. "Social Investment Management of PT. Chevron Pacific Indonesia in the framework of National Defense," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 16(1), pages 331-341, February.
    12. David A. Jones & Alexander Newman & Ruodan Shao & Fang Lee Cooke, 2019. "Advances in Employee-Focused Micro-Level Research on Corporate Social Responsibility: Situating New Contributions Within the Current State of the Literature," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 157(2), pages 293-302, June.
    13. Ngoc Phu Tran & Co Thi Huyen Dinh & Hien Thi Thu Hoang & Duc Hong Vo, 2022. "Intellectual Capital and Firm Performance in Vietnam: The Moderating Role of Corporate Social Responsibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-13, October.
    14. Afshin Omidi & Cinzia Dal Zotto, 2022. "Socially Responsible Human Resource Management: A Systematic Literature Review and Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-20, February.
    15. Ana Petrina Păun & Codruța Cornelia Dura & Sorin Mihăilescu & Roland Iosif Moraru & Claudia Adriana Isac, 2020. "OHS Disclosures Within Non-Financial Reports: The Romanian Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-28, March.
    16. Mónica Santana & Rafael Morales-Sánchez & Susana Pasamar, 2020. "Mapping the Link between Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Human Resource Management (HRM): How Is This Relationship Measured?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-28, February.
    17. Laura Pütz & Sabrina Schell & Arndt Werner, 2023. "Openness to knowledge: does corporate social responsibility mediate the relationship between familiness and absorptive capacity?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 60(4), pages 1449-1482, April.
    18. Maria LOGHIN & Răzvan Cătălin DOBREA & Octavian Mihai PERPELEA, 2022. "SWOT Analysis and Key Actors in the Field of CSR," Management and Economics Review, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 7(2), pages 246-257, June.
    19. Edyta Bombiak & Anna Marciniuk-Kluska, 2019. "Socially Responsible Human Resource Management as a Concept of Fostering Sustainable Organization-Building: Experiences of Young Polish Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-28, February.
    20. Tiina Onkila & Bhavesh Sarna, 2022. "A systematic literature review on employee relations with CSR: State of art and future research agenda," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(2), pages 435-447, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:cejopp:v:14:y:2020:i:1:p:31-42:n:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.