IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/admini/v69y2021i4p39-55n1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Structured, formal engagement of stakeholders in public policy – The case of An Fóram Uisce (The Water Forum)

Author

Listed:
  • Boyle Richard

    (Independent researcher; former Head of Research, Institute of Public Administration, Ireland)

  • O’Riordan Joanna

    (Institute of Public Administration, Ireland)

  • O’Leary Fergal

    (Institute of Public Administration, Ireland)

  • Shannon Laura

    (Institute of Public Administration, Ireland)

Abstract

This paper examines the operation of An Fóram Uisce (The Water Forum) and its role as a statutory body in formally engaging stakeholders in policy deliberation at the national level. An Fóram Uisce was established in 2018 and consists of twenty-six members, including stakeholders from agriculture, fisheries, business, trade unions and environmental organisations. The research finds a number of benefits of An Fóram as a means of stakeholder engagement. An Fóram is gradually evolving a role for itself in highlighting or putting an issue on the political and public agenda, and helping determine ways in which problems are addressed. It also provides members with a means of developing a shared understanding of the issues and agreeing potential solutions. Limitations exist, however. Notably, there is limited evidence to date of the impact of An Fóram on policy development in practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Boyle Richard & O’Riordan Joanna & O’Leary Fergal & Shannon Laura, 2021. "Structured, formal engagement of stakeholders in public policy – The case of An Fóram Uisce (The Water Forum)," Administration, Sciendo, vol. 69(4), pages 39-55, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:admini:v:69:y:2021:i:4:p:39-55:n:1
    DOI: 10.2478/admin-2021-0027
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/admin-2021-0027
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/admin-2021-0027?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liza Griffin, 2007. "All aboard: power, participation and governance in the North Sea regional advisory council," International Journal of Green Economics, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(3/4), pages 478-493.
    2. Manuel Fischer & Philip Leifeld, 2015. "Policy forums: Why do they exist and what are they used for?," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 48(3), pages 363-382, September.
    3. Lyall, Catherine & Tait, Joyce, 2019. "Beyond the limits to governance: New rules of engagement for the tentative governance of the life sciences," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(5), pages 1128-1137.
    4. Dustin J. Bluhm & Wendy Harman & Thomas W. Lee & Terence R. Mitchell, 2011. "Qualitative Research in Management: A Decade of Progress," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(8), pages 1866-1891, December.
    5. Wagner, Paul M. & Ylä-Anttila, Tuomas, 2020. "Can policy forums overcome echo chamber effects by enabling policy learning? Evidence from the Irish climate change policy network," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 40(2), pages 194-211, June.
    6. Wagner, Paul M. & Ylä-Anttila, Tuomas, 2020. "Can policy forums overcome echo chamber effects by enabling policy learning? Evidence from the Irish climate change policy network – CORRIGENDUM," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 40(2), pages 212-213, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eling, Martin & Jia, Ruo, 2018. "Business failure, efficiency, and volatility: Evidence from the European insurance industry," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 58-76.
    2. Jens Nilsson & Annica Sandström & Daniel Nohrstedt, 2020. "Beliefs, social identity, and the view of opponents in Swedish carnivore management policy," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 53(3), pages 453-472, September.
    3. Sven M. Laudien & Birgit Daxböck, 2016. "The Influence Of The Industrial Internet Of Things On Business Model Design: A Qualitative-Empirical Analysis," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(08), pages 1-28, December.
    4. Ewa Hącia & Natalia Wagner & Aleksandra Łapko, 2022. "The Importance of City Logistics for Urban Tourism Development: Searching for a New Research Field," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-17, December.
    5. Malhotra, P. & Singh, Manjari, 2014. "Individual Factors and Organisational Initiatives Enabling the Success of PWD-Managers," IIMA Working Papers WP2014-03-19, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    6. Inga Ulnicane & William Knight & Tonii Leach & Bernd Carsten Stahl & Winter-Gladys Wanjiku, 2021. "Framing governance for a contested emerging technology:insights from AI policy [The next space race is Artificial Intelligence]," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 40(2), pages 158-177.
    7. A. Rebecca Reuber & Eileen Fischer, 2022. "Putting qualitative international business research in context(s)," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(1), pages 27-38, February.
    8. Othmar Manfred Lehner & Alex Nicholls & Sarah Beatrice Kapplmüller, 2022. "Arenas of Contestation: A Senian Social Justice Perspective on the Nature of Materiality in Impact Measurement," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(4), pages 971-989, September.
    9. Sundarakani, Balan & Ajaykumar, Aneesh & Gunasekaran, Angappa, 2021. "Big data driven supply chain design and applications for blockchain: An action research using case study approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    10. O’Riordan Joanna & Boyle Richard, 2023. "Governance of reform in the Irish public service," Administration, Sciendo, vol. 71(3), pages 11-33, August.
    11. Frank van Rijnsoever, 2015. "(I Can’t Get No) Saturation: A Simulation and Guidelines for Minimum Sample Sizes in Qualitative Research," Innovation Studies Utrecht (ISU) working paper series 15-05, Utrecht University, Department of Innovation Studies, revised Oct 2015.
    12. Robert Arasa & Prudensia Kaihula, 2015. "The Role of Financial Intermediaries in the Internationalization of Capital Markets in Kenya: A Study of stock brokers in Kenya," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 7(5), pages 91-102.
    13. Thomas Clauss & Ricarda B. Bouncken & Sven Laudien & Sascha Kraus, 2019. "BUSINESS MODEL RECONFIGURATION AND INNOVATION IN SMEs: A MIXED-METHOD ANALYSIS FROM THE ELECTRONICS INDUSTRY," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 24(02), pages 1-35, April.
    14. Waldron, Theodore L. & McMullen, Jeffery S. & Petrenko, Oleg V. & Tribble Trudell, Lori & Aronson, Olivia, 2022. "Entrepreneur-investor rivalry over new venture control: The battle for Balcones Distilling," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 37(4).
    15. Cassell, Catherine, 2016. "European qualitative research: A celebration of diversity and a cautionary tale," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 453-456.
    16. Li, Shenxue & Easterby-Smith, Mark & Lyles, Marjorie A. & Clark, Timothy, 2016. "Tapping the power of local knowledge: A local-global interactive perspective," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 51(4), pages 641-653.
    17. Commeiras, Nathalie & Loubes, Anne & Bories-Azeau, Isabelle, 2013. "Identification of organizational socialization tactics: The case of sales and marketing trainees in higher education," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 164-178.
    18. Garrett Ward Richards, 2019. "The Science–Policy Relationship Hierarchy (SPRHi) model of co-production: how climate science organizations have influenced the policy process in Canadian case studies," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 52(1), pages 67-95, March.
    19. Behlül Üsdiken, 2014. "Centres and Peripheries: Research Styles and Publication Patterns in ‘Top’ US Journals and their European Alternatives, 1960–2010," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(5), pages 764-789, July.
    20. Forsström-Tuominen, Heidi & Jussila, Iiro & Kolhinen, Johanna, 2015. "Business school students’ social construction of entrepreneurship: Claiming space for collective entrepreneurship discourses," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 102-120.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:admini:v:69:y:2021:i:4:p:39-55:n:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.