IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/uwp/landec/v91y2015i2p362-385.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Norwegian Winter Herring Fishery: A Story of Technological Progress and Stock Collapse

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel V. Gordon
  • Rögnvaldur Hannesson

Abstract

In the 1970s, herring stocks in the Northeast Atlantic were nearly fished to extinction. This collapse is usually attributed to technological advances. We investigate the empirical impact of technological shocks on herring stocks. We show evidence that the power block was the principal factor in the demise of the stock. We also look at the sensitivity of catch to stock size and technological shocks. We measure a significant stock effect in the 1950s, contrary to what we expect. A simulation model indicates that this could have been caused by an increasing range of the fishing fleet due to ongoing technological progress.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel V. Gordon & Rögnvaldur Hannesson, 2015. "The Norwegian Winter Herring Fishery: A Story of Technological Progress and Stock Collapse," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 91(2), pages 362-385.
  • Handle: RePEc:uwp:landec:v:91:y:2015:i:2:p:362-385
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://le.uwpress.org/cgi/reprint/91/2/362
    Download Restriction: A subscripton is required to access pdf files. Pay per article is available.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gobillon, Laurent & Wolff, François-Charles, 2020. "The local effects of an innovation: Evidence from the French fish market," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    2. Anderson, James L. & Asche, Frank & Garlock, Taryn, 2018. "Globalization and commoditization: The transformation of the seafood market," Journal of Commodity Markets, Elsevier, vol. 12(C), pages 2-8.
    3. Martin Quaas & Anders Skonhoft, 2022. "Welfare Effects of Changing Technological Efficency in Regulated Open-Access Fisheries," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 82(4), pages 869-888, August.
    4. Walden, John & Fissel, Ben & Squires, Dale & Vestergaard, Niels, 2015. "Productivity change in commercial fisheries: An introduction to the special issue," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 289-293.
    5. Sturla Furunes Kvamsdal, 2016. "Technical Change as a Stochastic Trend in a Fisheries Model," Marine Resource Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 31(4), pages 403-419.
    6. Eric Nævdal, 2022. "Productivity and Management of Renewable Resources: Why More Efficient Fishing Fleets Should Fish Less," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 81(3), pages 409-424, March.
    7. Asche, Frank & Smith, Martin D., 2018. "Viewpoint: Induced Innovation in Fisheries and Aquaculture," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 1-7.
    8. Le Floc'h, Pascal & Merzéréaud, Mathieu & Beckensteiner, Jennifer & Alban, Frédérique & Duhamel, Erwan & Thébaud, Olivier & Wilson, James, 2023. "Explaining technical change and its impacts over the very long term: The case of the Atlantic sardine fishery in France from 1900 to 2017," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(9).
    9. Hannesson, Rögnvaldur, 2022. "Stock crash and recovery: The Norwegian spring spawning herring," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 45-58.
    10. Williams, Gary W. & Capps, Jr., Oral, 2022. "The apparent conflict of Norwegian pelagic fisheries management and Norwegian seafood council export promotion," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 25(3), February.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • C53 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Forecasting and Prediction Models; Simulation Methods
    • Q22 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Fishery

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uwp:landec:v:91:y:2015:i:2:p:362-385. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://le.uwpress.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.