IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/uwp/landec/v70y1994i2p189-196.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why Don't Households Connect to the Piped Water System? Observations from Tunis, Tunisia

Author

Listed:
  • Alexander A. McPhail

Abstract

From a study of 82 households in urban areas of Tunis, Tunisia, it appears that the most important obstacle in connecting to the piped water system is the utility-required cash down payment. Results from the study's contingent valuation questions showed that the respondents could easily afford the anticipated monthly charges for piped water and sewer service, and their bids for this service were very close to those for households already receiving them. A further conclusion is that, as the reliability of the piped water system increases, then the importance of a monthly tariff in the connection decision decreases.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander A. McPhail, 1994. "Why Don't Households Connect to the Piped Water System? Observations from Tunis, Tunisia," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 70(2), pages 189-196.
    • Handle: RePEc:uwp:landec:v:70:y:1994:i:2:p:189-196
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/3146321
    Download Restriction: A subscripton is required to access pdf files. Pay per article is available.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Van Houtven, George L. & Pattanayak, Subhrendu K. & Usmani, Faraz & Yang, Jui-Chen, 2017. "What are Households Willing to Pay for Improved Water Access? Results from a Meta-Analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 126-135.
    2. John P. Hoehn & Douglas J. Krieger, 2000. "An Economic Analysis of Water and Wastewater Investments in Cairo, Egypt," Evaluation Review, , vol. 24(6), pages 579-608, December.
    3. Perez-Pineda, Felipe & Quintanilla-Armijo, Carlos, 2013. "Estimating willingness-to-pay and financial feasibility in small water projects in El Salvador," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(10), pages 1750-1758.
    4. Wang, Hua & Lall, Somik, 1999. "Valuing water for Chinese industries : a marginal productivity assessment," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2236, The World Bank.
    5. V. Pande & V. Sharda & R. Kurothe & D. Sena & S. Tiwari, 2012. "An Empirical Assessment of On-Farm Water Productivity using Groundwater in a Semi-Arid Indian Watershed," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 26(2), pages 475-498, January.
    6. Sean Lyons & Joe O’Doherty & Richard Tol, 2010. "Determinants of Water Connection Type and Ownership of Water-Using Appliances in Ireland," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 24(12), pages 2853-2867, September.
    7. Webb, Patrick & Iskandarani, Maria, 1998. "Water Insecurity and the Poor: Issues and Research Needs," Discussion Papers 279785, University of Bonn, Center for Development Research (ZEF).
    8. Patrick Webb, 2005. "Water and Food Insecurity in Developing Countries:Major Challenges for the 21st Century," Working Papers in Food Policy and Nutrition 29, Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uwp:landec:v:70:y:1994:i:2:p:189-196. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://le.uwpress.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.