IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/url/upravl/v11y2020i2p16-26.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Empirical analysis of the relationship between the costs of corporate social responsibility policy implementation and Russian companies’ financial performance

Author

Listed:
  • Andrey B. Ankudinov

    (Kazan Federal University, Kazan, Russia)

  • Idelia R. Badykova

    (Kazan National Research Technological University, Kazan, Russia)

Abstract

Analysis of the current body of scientific knowledge on the problems of economic efficiency of corporate social responsibility (CSR) policy displays highly controversial results. The paper focuses on empirical analysis of the relationship between the level of social responsibility, as proxied by CSR policy implementation costs, and financial performance of Russian companies. The research methodology includes the conceptual framework of the instrumental approach to the corporate social responsibility theory. Accumulated knowledge and empirical results systematized in the article serve as the basis for statistical analysis of panel data. The authors employ random effects and fixed effects models. The sample comprises data covering the period of 2012–2018 for 22 Russian publicly traded companies. The value multiplier Market-to-Book Ratio (MBR) and the accounting indicator of profitability EBITDA margin are used as dependent variables. Estimates of the random effects model confirm a positive relationship between the value multiplier MBR and CSR policy implementation costs. However, the fixed effects model analysis failed to confirm any statistically significant relationship between the value multiplier MBR and CSR costs, which supports the conclusion that decisions on CSR policy implementation in Russia are mainly due to individual characteristics of companies related to unobservable effects. Both models did not reveal a statistically significant relationship between the chosen CSR proxy variable and the accounting indicator of financial performance. The empirical results generally confirm that socially responsible behavior can act as a driver of raising funds even in the context of imperfect market; however, managerial decisions in this field are largely determined by individual characteristics of companies.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrey B. Ankudinov & Idelia R. Badykova, 2020. "Empirical analysis of the relationship between the costs of corporate social responsibility policy implementation and Russian companies’ financial performance," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 11(2), pages 16-26, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:url:upravl:v:11:y:2020:i:2:p:16-26
    DOI: 10.29141/2218-5003-2019-11-2-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://upravlenets.usue.ru/images/84/2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://upravlenets.usue.ru/ru/-2020/628
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.29141/2218-5003-2019-11-2-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Otgontsetseg Erhemjamts & Qian Li & Anand Venkateswaran, 2013. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Its Impact on Firms’ Investment Policy, Organizational Structure, and Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 118(2), pages 395-412, December.
    2. Lee, Ji Hye & Byun, Hee Sub & Park, Kyung Suh, 2018. "Product market competition and corporate social responsibility activities: Perspectives from an emerging economy," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 60-80.
    3. Andrey B. ANKUDINOV & Idelia R. BADYKOVA & Yelena S. MARKHANOVA, 2018. "Empirical Analysis of the Relation Between Expenditures on Employees’ Advanced Training and Financial Performance of Russian Companies," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 9(4), pages 74-83, August.
    4. Hong Zhou & Guoping Li & Wanfa Lin, 2016. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Credit Spreads: An Empirical Study in Chinese Context," Annals of Economics and Finance, Society for AEF, vol. 17(1), pages 79-103, May.
    5. Henri Servaes & Ane Tamayo, 2013. "The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Firm Value: The Role of Customer Awareness," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(5), pages 1045-1061, May.
    6. Karl V. Lins & Henri Servaes & Ane Tamayo, 2017. "Social Capital, Trust, and Firm Performance: The Value of Corporate Social Responsibility during the Financial Crisis," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 72(4), pages 1785-1824, August.
    7. Yen, Tze-Yu & André, Paul, 2019. "Market reaction to the effect of corporate social responsibility on mergers and acquisitions: Evidence on emerging markets," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 114-131.
    8. Nofsinger, John R. & Sulaeman, Johan & Varma, Abhishek, 2019. "Institutional investors and corporate social responsibility," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 700-725.
    9. Issam Laguir & Raffaele Staglianò & Jamal Elbaz, 2015. "Does corporate social responsibility affect corporate tax aggressiveness?," Post-Print hal-02053812, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bela S. Bataeva & Aglaya D. Kokurina & Nikita A. Karpov, 2021. "The impact of ESG reporting on the financial performance of Russian public companies," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 12(6), pages 20-32, October.
    2. Anna I. Izgarova & Elena M. Rogova & Olga V. Bakhareva, 2023. "ESG investment relationship with financial performance of Russian companies," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 14(3), pages 17-29, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Xianda & Hou, Wenxuan & Main, Brian G.M., 2022. "Anti-market sentiment and corporate social responsibility: Evidence from anti-Jewish pogroms," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    2. Gillan, Stuart L. & Koch, Andrew & Starks, Laura T., 2021. "Firms and social responsibility: A review of ESG and CSR research in corporate finance," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    3. Thomas J. Chemmanur & Dimitrios Gounopoulos & Panagiotis Koutroumpis & Yu Zhang, 2022. "CSR and Firm Survival: Evidence from the Climate and Pandemic Crises," Working Papers 935, Queen Mary University of London, School of Economics and Finance.
    4. Amin, Abu & Chourou, Lamia & Kamal, Syed & Malik, Mahfuja & Zhao, Yang, 2020. "It’s who you know that counts: Board connectedness and CSR performance," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    5. Xin Xu & Yi Xie & Feng Xiong & Yan Li, 2022. "The Impact of COVID-19 on Investors’ Investment Intention of Sustainability-Related Investment: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-37, April.
    6. Chao Yan & Jiaxin Wang & Zhi Wang & Kam C. Chan, 2023. "Awe culture and corporate social responsibility: Evidence from China," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(3), pages 3487-3517, September.
    7. Peng, Hongfeng & Zhang, Zhenqi & Goodell, John W. & Li, Mingsheng, 2023. "Socially responsible investing: Is it for real or just for show?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    8. Serge Darolles & Gaëlle Le Fol & Yuyi He, 2023. "Who can better push firms to go "green"? A look at ESG effects on stock returns," Post-Print hal-04462749, HAL.
    9. Luo, Di, 2022. "ESG, liquidity, and stock returns," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    10. Bardos, Katsiaryna Salavei & Ertugrul, Mine & Gao, Lucia Silva, 2020. "Corporate social responsibility, product market perception, and firm value," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    11. Shu, Pei-Gi & Chiang, Sue-Jane, 2020. "The impact of corporate governance on corporate social performance: Cases from listed firms in Taiwan," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    12. Leon Zolotoy & Don O’Sullivan & Keke Song, 2021. "The Role of Ethical Standards in the Relationship Between Religious Social Norms and M&A Announcement Returns," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 170(4), pages 721-742, May.
    13. Amrou Awaysheh & Randall A. Heron & Tod Perry & Jared I. Wilson, 2020. "On the relation between corporate social responsibility and financial performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(6), pages 965-987, June.
    14. Lai Van Vo & Huong Thi Thu Le & Youngbin Kim, 2023. "Board interlocks, career prospects and corporate social responsibility," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(4), pages 4565-4595, December.
    15. Wong, Jin Boon & Zhang, Qin, 2022. "Stock market reactions to adverse ESG disclosure via media channels," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 54(1).
    16. Malik, Ihtisham A. & Chowdhury, Hasibul & Alam, Md Samsul, 2023. "Equity market response to natural disasters: Does firm's corporate social responsibility make difference?," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    17. Shackleton, Mark & Yan, Jiali & Yao, Yaqiong, 2022. "What drives a firm's ES performance? Evidence from stock returns," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    18. An-Pin Wei & Chi-Lu Peng & Hao-Chen Huang & Shang-Pao Yeh, 2020. "Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility on Firm Performance: Does Customer Satisfaction Matter?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-18, September.
    19. Asimakopoulos, Panagiotis & Asimakopoulos, Stylianos & Li, Xinyu, 2023. "The role of environmental, social, and governance rating on corporate debt structure," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    20. V. Veeravel & E. K. S. Sadharma & Bandi Kamaiah, 2024. "Do ESG disclosures lead to superior firm performance? A method of moments panel quantile regression approach," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(1), pages 741-754, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    socially responsible behavior; corporate social responsibility; Russian companies; financial performance; empirical analysis; panel data.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility
    • G30 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - General
    • O16 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Financial Markets; Saving and Capital Investment; Corporate Finance and Governance

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:url:upravl:v:11:y:2020:i:2:p:16-26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Victor Blaginin (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/usueeru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.