Pests, Plagues, and Patents
AbstractThe paper investigates the interaction between dynamic forms of incentive mechanisms (patent systems) and dynamic forms of problems (adaptations of pests and pathogens). Since biological problems recur, the design of the incentive mechanism must take into consideration: a) the need for investments into R&D that take into account the impermanence of the solution concepts; and b) the impact of this impermanence on the anticipated lifespan of any patent awarded for an innovation. The results indicate that patent systems must be carefully tailored to the nature of the problem under consideration. (JEL: C7, H0, H3, Q38) Copyright (c) 2003 The European Economic Association.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by MIT Press in its journal Journal of the European Economic Association.
Volume (Year): 1 (2003)
Issue (Month): 2-3 (04/05)
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.mitpressjournals.org/jeea
Find related papers by JEL classification:
- C7 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory
- H0 - Public Economics - - General
- H3 - Public Economics - - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents
- Q38 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Nonrenewable Resources and Conservation - - - Government Policy (includes OPEC Policy)
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Eugenio Figueroa B. & Roberto Pasten C., 2012. "The insurance value of forests in supplying climate regulation," Working Papers wp372, University of Chile, Department of Economics.
- Béné, C. & Doyen, L., 2008. "Contribution values of biodiversity to ecosystem performances: A viability perspective," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(1-2), pages 14-23, December.
- Baumgartner, Stefan & Becker, Christian & Faber, Malte & Manstetten, Reiner, 2006. "Relative and absolute scarcity of nature. Assessing the roles of economics and ecology for biodiversity conservation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(4), pages 487-498, October.
- Gatti, J.R.J. & Goeschl, T. & Groom, B. & Timothy Swanson, 2004.
"The Biodiversity Bargaining Problem,"
Cambridge Working Papers in Economics
0447, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
- Oleg Yerokhin & GianCarlo Moschini, 2007.
"Intellectual Property Rights and Crop-Improving R&D under Adaptive Destruction,"
Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications
07-wp449, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
- Oleg Yerokhin & GianCarlo Moschini, 2008. "Intellectual Property Rights and Crop-Improving R&D under Adaptive Destruction," Environmental & Resource Economics, European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 40(1), pages 53-72, May.
- Yerokhin, Oleg & Moschini, GianCarlo, 2007. "Intellectual Property Rights and Crop-Improving R&D Under Adaptive Destruction," Staff General Research Papers 12825, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
- Roberto ESPOSTI, 2003. "Complementarita' innovative e tragedia degli anticommons. Il caso delle agrobiotecnologie," Working Papers 198, Universita' Politecnica delle Marche (I), Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Karie Kirkpatrick).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.