This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Why Eva Baker Doesn't Seem to Understand Accountability: The Politimetrics of Accountability?

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Glynn D. Ligon ()
Abstract

Formative assessment has been under-valued and under-funded in education. Formative assessment is what really helps teachers focus their instruction on students’ immediate needs. A major complaint educators have about statewide accountability assessments is that they make poor formative assessments for teachers. True, but the real problem is we can’t seem to let accountability assessments simply do their job without faulting them for not being formative assessments as well. We should all be demanding separate assessments—one designed to be an excellent accountability measure, and many designed to be excellent formative assessments. But no, educators who disagree with the money and time invested in accountability measures have lobbied politicians to stretch the use of those assessments beyond the capability of a well-designed accountability test. There is plenty of money to have two separate assessment programs—one to rate schools and one to diagnose and prescribe instruction. Plenty of money if we automate test administration, scoring, and reporting. Plenty of money if we apply extreme security and confidentiality standards only to the accountability assessments, not to the formative assessments.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.npe.ednews.org/Review/Articles/v3n1.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no
File URL: http://www.npe.ednews.org/Review/Articles/v3n1.htm
File Format: text/html
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Article provided by Nonpartisan Education Review in its journal Nonpartisan Education Review.

Volume (Year): 3 (2007)
Issue (Month): 1 ()
Pages: 1-30
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:teg:journl:v:3:y:2007:i:1:p:1-30

Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.nonpartisaneducation.org

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Richard P. Phelps).

Related research
Keywords: education; policy;

Find related papers by JEL classification:
I2 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? About 1000 archives contribute their bibliographic data to RePEc.

This page was last updated on 2009-12-12.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.