IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/teg/journl/v3y2007i1p1-30.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why Eva Baker Doesn't Seem to Understand Accountability: The Politimetrics of Accountability?

Author

Listed:
  • Glynn D. Ligon

Abstract

Formative assessment has been under-valued and under-funded in education. Formative assessment is what really helps teachers focus their instruction on students’ immediate needs. A major complaint educators have about statewide accountability assessments is that they make poor formative assessments for teachers. True, but the real problem is we can’t seem to let accountability assessments simply do their job without faulting them for not being formative assessments as well. We should all be demanding separate assessments—one designed to be an excellent accountability measure, and many designed to be excellent formative assessments. But no, educators who disagree with the money and time invested in accountability measures have lobbied politicians to stretch the use of those assessments beyond the capability of a well-designed accountability test. There is plenty of money to have two separate assessment programs—one to rate schools and one to diagnose and prescribe instruction. Plenty of money if we automate test administration, scoring, and reporting. Plenty of money if we apply extreme security and confidentiality standards only to the accountability assessments, not to the formative assessments.

Suggested Citation

  • Glynn D. Ligon, 2007. "Why Eva Baker Doesn't Seem to Understand Accountability: The Politimetrics of Accountability?," Nonpartisan Education Review, Nonpartisan Education Review, vol. 3(1), pages 1-30.
  • Handle: RePEc:teg:journl:v:3:y:2007:i:1:p:1-30
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://nonpartisaneducation.org/Review/Articles/v3n1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://nonpartisaneducation.org/Review/Articles/v3n1.htm
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    education; policy;

    JEL classification:

    • I2 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:teg:journl:v:3:y:2007:i:1:p:1-30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Richard P. Phelps (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nonpartisaneducation.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.