IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tprsxx/v54y2016i20p6092-6101.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating Six Sigma failure rate for inverse Gaussian cycle times

Author

Listed:
  • Mustapha Nourelfath
  • Tariq Aldowaisan
  • Jawad Hassan

Abstract

Six Sigma is a quality philosophy and methodology that aims to achieve operational excellence and delighted customers. The cost of poor quality depends on the sigma quality level and its corresponding failure rate. Six Sigma provides a well-defined target of 3.4 defects per million. This failure rate is commonly evaluated under the assumption that the process is normally distributed and its specifications are two-sided. However, these assumptions may lead to implementation of quality-improvement strategies that are based on inaccurate evaluations of quality costs and profits. This paper defines the relationship between failure rate and sigma quality level for inverse Gaussian processes. The inverse Gaussian distribution has considerable applications in describing cycle times, product life, employee service times, and so on. We show that for these processes attaining Six Sigma target failure rate requires higher quality efforts than for normal processes. A generic model is presented to characterise cycle times in manufacturing systems. In this model, the asymptotic production is described by a drifted Brownian motion, and the cycle time is evaluated by using the first passage time theory of a Wiener process to a boundary. The proposed method estimates the right efforts required to reach Six Sigma goals.

Suggested Citation

  • Mustapha Nourelfath & Tariq Aldowaisan & Jawad Hassan, 2016. "Evaluating Six Sigma failure rate for inverse Gaussian cycle times," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(20), pages 6092-6101, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:54:y:2016:i:20:p:6092-6101
    DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2016.1190880
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00207543.2016.1190880
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00207543.2016.1190880?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nourelfath, Mustapha & Hassan, Jawad, 2015. "Six Sigma performance for non-normal processesAuthor-Name: Aldowaisan, Tariq," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(3), pages 968-977.
    2. Chen, Huifen & Chang, Kuo-Hwa & Cheng, Liuying, 2004. "Estimation of means and covariances of inverse-Gaussian order statistics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(1), pages 154-169, May.
    3. Kumar, U. Dinesh & Nowicki, David & Ramirez-Marquez, Jose Emmanuel & Verma, Dinesh, 2008. "On the optimal selection of process alternatives in a Six Sigma implementation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(2), pages 456-467, February.
    4. Saghaei, Abbas & Najafi, Hoorieh & Noorossana, Rassoul, 2012. "Enhanced Rolled Throughput Yield: A new six sigma-based performance measure," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(1), pages 368-373.
    5. Hsu, Ya-Chen & Pearn, W.L. & Wu, Pei-Ching, 2008. "Capability adjustment for gamma processes with mean shift consideration in implementing Six Sigma program," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 191(2), pages 517-529, December.
    6. Nourelfath, Mustapha, 2011. "Service level robustness in stochastic production planning under random machine breakdowns," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 212(1), pages 81-88, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ľubica Simanová & Andrea Sujová, 2022. "The Impact of Continuous Improvement Concepts on the Performance of Furniture Production Processes," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2022(1), pages 111-137.
    2. Jorge Luis García-Alcaraz & Giner Alor-Hernández & Cuauhtémoc Sánchez-Ramírez & Emilio Jiménez-Macías & Julio Blanco-Fernández & Juan I. Latorre-Biel, 2018. "Mediating Role of the Six Sigma Implementation Strategy and Investment in Human Resources in Economic Success and Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-21, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nourelfath, Mustapha & Hassan, Jawad, 2015. "Six Sigma performance for non-normal processesAuthor-Name: Aldowaisan, Tariq," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(3), pages 968-977.
    2. Lepore, A. & Palumbo, B. & Castagliola, P., 2018. "A note on decision making method for product acceptance based on process capability indices Cpk and Cpmk," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(1), pages 393-398.
    3. CHEN, Piao & YE, Zhi-Sheng, 2018. "A systematic look at the gamma process capability indices," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(2), pages 589-597.
    4. Jana Fabianová & Jaroslava Janeková & Daniela Onofrejová, 2017. "Cost Analysis of Poor Quality Using a Software Simulation," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 19(44), pages 181-181, February.
    5. Zu, Xingxing & Robbins, Tina L. & Fredendall, Lawrence D., 2010. "Mapping the critical links between organizational culture and TQM/Six Sigma practices," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 123(1), pages 86-106, January.
    6. Kazaz, Burak & Sloan, Thomas W., 2013. "The impact of process deterioration on production and maintenance policies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 227(1), pages 88-100.
    7. Kalashnikov, Vyacheslav & Benita, Francisco & López-Ramos, Francisco & Hernández-Luna, Alberto, 2017. "Bi-objective project portfolio selection in Lean Six Sigma," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 81-88.
    8. V�ctor Leiva & Carolina Marchant & Helton Saulo & Muhammad Aslam & Fernando Rojas, 2014. "Capability indices for Birnbaum-Saunders processes applied to electronic and food industries," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(9), pages 1881-1902, September.
    9. Kai Sandner & Sebastian Sieber & Marleen Tellermann & Frank Walthes, 2020. "A Lean Six Sigma framework for the insurance industry: insights and lessons learned from a case study," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 90(5), pages 845-878, June.
    10. Taş, Duygu & Gendreau, Michel & Jabali, Ola & Jans, Raf, 2019. "A capacitated lot sizing problem with stochastic setup times and overtime," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(1), pages 146-159.
    11. Gajpal, Yuvraj & Nourelfath, Mustapha, 2015. "Two efficient heuristics to solve the integrated load distribution and production planning problem," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 204-214.
    12. Wang, Xiaofei & Wang, Bing Xing & Hong, Yili & Jiang, Pei Hua, 2021. "Degradation data analysis based on gamma process with random effects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 292(3), pages 1200-1208.
    13. Glover, Wiljeana J. & Farris, Jennifer A. & Van Aken, Eileen M. & Doolen, Toni L., 2011. "Critical success factors for the sustainability of Kaizen event human resource outcomes: An empirical study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(2), pages 197-213, August.
    14. Pérez-González, Carlos J. & Fernández, Arturo J. & Kohansal, Akram, 2020. "Efficient truncated repetitive lot inspection using Poisson defect counts and prior information," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(3), pages 964-974.
    15. Erceg Aleksandar & Dotlić Predrag & Mikuš Monika, 2018. "The 20 Keys Methodology – Continuous Improvement for Organizational Efficiency," Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Oeconomica, Sciendo, vol. 63(1), pages 20-36, April.
    16. Mahmoud Dehghan Nayeri & Malihe Rostami, 2016. "Effectiveness of six sigma methodology through BSC in banking industry," Journal of Asian Business Strategy, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 6(1), pages 13-21, January.
    17. Anshu Gupta & Pallavi Sharma & Akansha Jain & Hongbo Xue & S. C. Malik & P. C. Jha, 2023. "An integrated DEMATEL Six Sigma hybrid framework for manufacturing process improvement," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 322(2), pages 713-753, March.
    18. Fakhraddin Maroofi & Mohammad Nazaripour & Shahoo Maaznezhad, 2012. "Links Between Organizational Culture and Six Sigma Practices," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 2(4), pages 83-101, October.
    19. Jin, Tongdan & Janamanchi, Balaji & Feng, Qianmei, 2011. "Reliability deployment in distributed manufacturing chains via closed-loop Six Sigma methodology," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(1), pages 96-103, March.
    20. Sunney Fotedar & Ann-Brith Strömberg & Torgny Almgren & Stefan Cedergren, 2023. "A criterion space decomposition approach to generalized tri-objective tactical resource allocation," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 1-28, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:54:y:2016:i:20:p:6092-6101. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TPRS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.