IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpxmxx/v10y2008i6p733-749.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing network-based collaborations

Author

Listed:
  • Brian Head

Abstract

This article suggests that network collaborations are likely to vary in important ways depending on the nature of the issue/challenge being addressed and the range of stakeholders involved. Collaborative networks are more likely to emerge in policy settings where negotiated accommodations among stakeholders are seen as necessary and appropriate, and thus where technical solutions are not feasible. Under these conditions of negotiated objectives and processes, with complex causal pathways, ‘effectiveness’ becomes more problematic to determine. Networks bring to the table a diversity of stakeholder views and thus diverse perspectives about goals, processes, and outcomes. Evaluating network-based governance arrangements is complex because policy and programme processes and change management have become more complex. Evaluation needs to consider the sustainability of good processes (‘built to last’), as well as the achievement of desired service outcomes (e.g. greater benefits for citizens).

Suggested Citation

  • Brian Head, 2008. "Assessing network-based collaborations," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(6), pages 733-749.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpxmxx:v:10:y:2008:i:6:p:733-749
    DOI: 10.1080/14719030802423087
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14719030802423087
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14719030802423087?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Steffie Lucidarme & Greet Cardon & Annick Willem, 2016. "A Comparative Study of Health Promotion Networks: Configurations of determinants for network effectiveness," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(8), pages 1163-1217, September.
    2. Asnawi Manaf & Novia Purbasari & Maya Damayanti & Nanda Aprilia & Winny Astuti, 2018. "Community-Based Rural Tourism in Inter-Organizational Collaboration: How Does It Work Sustainably? Lessons Learned from Nglanggeran Tourism Village, Gunungkidul Regency, Yogyakarta, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-18, June.
    3. Carmen Echebarria & Jose M. Barrutia, 2011. "Managing Policy Networks: A Social Marketing- And Collective Intelligence Systems-Driven View," ERSA conference papers ersa11p1402, European Regional Science Association.
    4. Daryl P. McPhee, 2017. "Urban Recreational Fisheries in the Australian Coastal Zone: The Sustainability Challenge," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-12, March.
    5. Peeters, Robin & Westra, Daan & van Raak, Arno J.A. & Ruwaard, Dirk, 2023. "Getting our hopes up: How actors perceive network effectiveness and why it matters," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 325(C).
    6. Annick Willem & Steffie Lucidarme, 2014. "Pitfalls and Challenges for Trust and Effectiveness in Collaborative Networks," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(5), pages 733-760, June.
    7. Flannery, Wesley & O’Hagan, Anne Marie & O’Mahony, Cathal & Ritchie, Heather & Twomey, Sarah, 2015. "Evaluating conditions for transboundary Marine Spatial Planning: Challenges and opportunities on the island of Ireland," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 86-95.
    8. Jill Fernandes & Dominique Blache & Shane K. Maloney & Graeme B. Martin & Bronwyn Venus & Frederick Rohan Walker & Brian Head & Alan Tilbrook, 2019. "Addressing Animal Welfare through Collaborative Stakeholder Networks," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-14, June.
    9. Ingmar van Meerkerk & Jurian Edelenbos & Erik-Hans Klijn, 2015. "Connective management and governance network performance: the mediating role of throughput legitimacy. Findings from survey research on complex water projects in the Netherlands," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 33(4), pages 746-764, August.
    10. Murat Sartas & Marc Schut & Frans Hermans & Piet van Asten & Cees Leeuwis, 2018. "Effects of multi-stakeholder platforms on multi-stakeholder innovation networks: Implications for research for development interventions targeting innovations at scale," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(6), pages 1-20, June.
    11. Steffie Lucidarme & Mathieu Marlier & Greet Cardon & Ilse Bourdeaudhuij & Annick Willem, 2014. "Critical success factors for physical activity promotion through community partnerships," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 59(1), pages 51-60, February.
    12. Willem, Annick, 2010. "Trust in whole networks in the public and nonprofit sector: The impact of public sector characteristics," Working Papers 2010/13, Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel, Faculteit Economie en Management.
    13. Arntsen, Bjørnulf & Torjesen, Dag Olaf & Karlsen, Tor-Ivar, 2020. "Associations between structures, processes and outcomes in inter-municipal cooperation in out-of-hours services in Norway: A survey study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    14. Manuel Fischer & Philip Leifeld, 2015. "Policy forums: Why do they exist and what are they used for?," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 48(3), pages 363-382, September.
    15. Hermans, Frans & van Apeldoorn, Dirk & Stuiver, Marian & Kok, Kasper, 2013. "Niches and networks: Explaining network evolution through niche formation processes," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 613-623.
    16. Carey Doberstein, 2016. "Designing Collaborative Governance Decision-Making in Search of a ‘Collaborative Advantage’," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(6), pages 819-841, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpxmxx:v:10:y:2008:i:6:p:733-749. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rpxm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.