Performance failure in the public sector
AbstractCentral government in the UK has introduced procedures for assessing and categorizing the performance of public organizations. These procedures assume that performance is attributable to organizational decisions rather than external circumstances. This implies that mismanagement, rather than misfortune, is the primary cause of public service failure. We test this argument by developing a statistical model of the impact of internal characteristics and external constraints on service standards, using data from a range of secondary sources and a multiple informant survey in 120 English local authorities. We then apply this model to the results of the comprehensive performance assessment in English local government. The evidence shows that organizational failure is to some extent attributable to difficult circumstances (such as diverse service needs and poverty) and management characteristics (such as weak leadership and poor performance management). Thus performance failure is associated with both misfortune and mismanagement.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Taylor & Francis Journals in its journal Public Management Review.
Volume (Year): 8 (2006)
Issue (Month): 2 (June)
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPXM20
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Miglena PENCHEVA, 2009. "Organizational Culture in Business, Public and non Profit Sectors," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 10(2), pages 367-374, May.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Michael McNulty).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.