IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/oabmxx/v4y2017i1p1406321.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The information science policy for the public open data of the national research institute

Author

Listed:
  • Donghun Yoon

Abstract

In modern society, the importance of information is constantly growing. Human life has been diversely changed due to the volume expansion of information handling and distribution. The rapid growth and informatization of information and communications technology (ICT) could be the driver of the production and distribution of information in the real world. Also, it has greatly influenced the economy, politics, society, culture, etc. As the value of information continues to increase, all governments around the world are becoming more and more interested in the reaction to the provision of information. The people need liberty and equality in the environment for the acquisition or utilization of necessary information. Especially due to the importance of the information sharing system, both the government and people are greatly interested in the information sharing policy of the government. Information sharing policies around the world greatly affect people. They disclose information (from government agencies, local government units, public institutions, etc.) to people. However, in the case of national research institutes, their information sharing policy has been ineffective due to the specialty of their work and data. Also, their data are not at the general information sharing level. In this paper, first, the information science policy for public open data of national research institutes is presented and discussed. First, we will look for an efficient method of information sharing policy-making for national research institutes. Then we will discuss and present research results data of national research institutes. These will comprise the most useful information from national research institutes. Also, the actual availability of the research results data will be discussed through their utilization trend analysis. In this paper, we propose the information science policy direction for public open data of national research institutes through a study of their information sharing system.

Suggested Citation

  • Donghun Yoon, 2017. "The information science policy for the public open data of the national research institute," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 1406321-140, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:4:y:2017:i:1:p:1406321
    DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2017.1406321
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23311975.2017.1406321
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23311975.2017.1406321?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Diana Hicks & J Sylvan Katz, 1996. "Science policy for a highly collaborative science system," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 23(1), pages 39-44, February.
    2. Dara HALLINAN & Michael FRIEDEWALD, 2012. "Public Perception of the Data Environment and Information Transactions: A selected-survey analysis of the European public's views on the data environment and data transactions," Communications & Strategies, IDATE, Com&Strat dept., vol. 1(88), pages 61-78, 4th quart.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Haklae Kim, 2019. "Analysis of standard vocabulary use of the open government data: the case of the public data portal of Korea," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 53(3), pages 1611-1622, May.
    2. Selma Leticia Capinzaiki Ottonicar & Paloma Marin Arraiza & Fabiano Armellini, 2020. "Opening Science and Innovation: Opportunities for Emerging Economies," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 14(4), pages 95-111.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. J. Sylvan Katz & Guillermo Armando Ronda-Pupo, 2019. "Cooperation, scale-invariance and complex innovation systems: a generalization," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 121(2), pages 1045-1065, November.
    2. Paul A. David & Louise C. Keely, 2003. "The Economics of Scientific Research Coalitions: Collaborative Network Formation in the Presence of Multiple Funding Agencies," Chapters, in: Aldo Geuna & Ammon J. Salter & W. Edward Steinmueller (ed.), Science and Innovation, chapter 8, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Yuan Chih Fu & Marcelo Marques & Yuen-Hsien Tseng & Justin J. W. Powell & David P. Baker, 2022. "An evolving international research collaboration network: spatial and thematic developments in co-authored higher education research, 1998–2018," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(3), pages 1403-1429, March.
    4. Hanna Hottenrott & Michael E. Rose & Cornelia Lawson, 2021. "The rise of multiple institutional affiliations in academia," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 72(8), pages 1039-1058, August.
    5. Adams, James D. & Black, Grant C. & Clemmons, J. Roger & Stephan, Paula E., 2005. "Scientific teams and institutional collaborations: Evidence from U.S. universities, 1981-1999," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 259-285, April.
    6. Bo Jarneving, 2010. "Regional research and foreign collaboration," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 83(1), pages 295-320, April.
    7. Butler, Linda, 2003. "Explaining Australia's increased share of ISI publications--the effects of a funding formula based on publication counts," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 143-155, January.
    8. Jonathan Adams & Jo Johnson & Jonathan Grant, 2022. "The rise of UK–China research collaboration: Trends, opportunities and challenges [The West Should Start Sending Its Scientists to China]," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 49(1), pages 132-147.
    9. Teemu Makkonen & Timo Mitze, 2016. "Scientific collaboration between ‘old’ and ‘new’ member states: Did joining the European Union make a difference?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 106(3), pages 1193-1215, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:4:y:2017:i:1:p:1406321. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://cogentoa.tandfonline.com/OABM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.