IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jeduce/v47y2016i4p288-299.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Classroom experiments: Teaching specific topics or promoting the economic way of thinking?

Author

Listed:
  • Tisha L. N. Emerson
  • Linda K. English

Abstract

The authors' data contain inter- and intra-class variations in experiments to which students in a principles of microeconomics course were exposed. These variations allowed the estimation of the effect on student achievement from the experimental treatment generally, as well as effects associated with participation in specific experiments. The authors find that students exposed to the experimental treatment enjoyed significantly higher positive learning gains than those in the no-experiment control group. The productivity experiment was associated with significantly more positive learning, the minimum wage experiment with less negative learning, and the externality experiment with less positive learning. The authors further find that some experiments affect student learning on the demonstrated topics, while others affect student learning on unrelated topics.

Suggested Citation

  • Tisha L. N. Emerson & Linda K. English, 2016. "Classroom experiments: Teaching specific topics or promoting the economic way of thinking?," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(4), pages 288-299, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jeduce:v:47:y:2016:i:4:p:288-299
    DOI: 10.1080/00220485.2016.1213684
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00220485.2016.1213684
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00220485.2016.1213684?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Saunders, Phillip, 1991. "The Third Edition of the Test of Understanding in College Economics," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 81(2), pages 32-37, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Paul W. Grimes & Kevin E. Rogers & William D. Bosshardt, 2021. "Economic Education and Household Financial Outcomes during the Financial Crisis," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-12, July.
    2. Steven B. Caudill & Franklin G. Mixon, 2023. "Guess for Success? Application of a Mixture Model to Test-Wiseness on Multiple-Choice Exams," Stats, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-6, June.
    3. Bartels, Lara & Falk, Thomas & Duche, Vishwambhar & Vollan, Björn, 2022. "Experimental games in transdisciplinary research: The potential importance of individual payments," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    4. Cynthia Harter & Diego Mendez-Carbajo, 2024. "Diving into the Gap: Recognizing Gender Differences in an Online Learning Activity," Eastern Economic Journal, Palgrave Macmillan;Eastern Economic Association, vol. 50(1), pages 79-102, January.
    5. Lin, Yu-Hsuan, 2021. "A classroom experiment on the specific factors model," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 37(C).
    6. James R. Bruehler & Linda S. Ghent & Alan P. Grant, 2019. "Incentives and Economic Systems: A Classroom Exercise," Journal of Private Enterprise, The Association of Private Enterprise Education, vol. 34(Winter 20), pages 99-114.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rajshree Agarwal & A. Edward Day, 1998. "The Impact of the Internet on Economic Education," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(2), pages 99-110, June.
    2. Tisha L. N. Emerson & Linda K. English & KimMarie McGoldrick, 2015. "Evaluating the Cooperative Component in Cooperative Learning: A Quasi-Experimental Study," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(1), pages 1-13, March.
    3. T. Aldrich Finegan & John J. Siegfried, 1998. "Do Introductory Economics Students Learn More if Their Instructor Has a PH.D.?," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 42(2), pages 34-46, October.
    4. Jane S. Lopus, 1997. "Effects of the High School Economics Curriculum on Learning in the College Principles Class," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(2), pages 143-153, June.
    5. Yvonne Durham & Thomas Mckinnon & Craig Schulman, 2007. "Classroom Experiments: Not Just Fun And Games," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 45(1), pages 162-178, January.
    6. Jane S. Lopus & Nan L. Maxwell, 1994. "Beyond High School: Does the High School Economics Curriculum Make a Difference?," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 38(1), pages 62-69, March.
    7. Scott Simkins & Stuart Allen, 2000. "Pretesting students to improve teaching and learning," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 6(1), pages 100-112, February.
    8. Andrea L. Ziegert, 2000. "The Role of Personality Temperament and Student Learning in Principles of Economics: Further Evidence," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(4), pages 307-322, December.
    9. William B. Walstad, 2001. "Improving Assessment in University Economics," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(3), pages 281-294, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jeduce:v:47:y:2016:i:4:p:288-299. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/VECE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.