This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Donor harmonisation and government ownership: multi-donor budget support in Ghana

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Bettina Woll
Abstract

Multi-donor budget support mechanisms are currently the predominant tool in development cooperation. They are heralded for granting greater autonomy to the recipient government and for increasing its discretion to spend the public budget. To this end, a multi-donor budget support mechanism was established in Ghana in 2003. In order to assure proper management of the public budget, donors pressured for inclusion of a list of reform elements that the government had to implement in order to receive the full funding. To understand whether this type of conditionality can be successful, this article explores the underlying concept of ownership and analyses the power relationships between donors and the recipient. The article illustrates that the Ghanaian government formulated development strategies with a view of pleasing the donors but with little intention to alter conventional patterns of everyday politics. L'aide budgétaire multilatérale est actuellement l'outil le plus utilisé dans la coopération au développement. Il est annoncé comme offrant une plus grande autonomie au Gouvernement bénéficiaire, lui facilitant également l'affectation des montants alloués. Dans cette optique, un système multilatéral d'aide budgétaire a été établi au Ghana en 2003. Afin d'assurer une bonne gestion des fonds publics, les donateurs ont fait pression pour faire inclure une liste d'éléments de réforme que le Gouvernement devait mettre en oeuvre pour recevoir la totalité des fonds. Pour comprendre si ce type de conditionnalité peut porter ses fruits, cet article considère le concept sous-jacent de participation (ownership) et analyse les relations de pouvoir entre les donateurs et les bénéficiaires. Cet article montre que le gouvernement Ghanéen a formulé ses stratégies de façon à faire plaisir aux donateurs sans pour autant avoir la moindre intention de changer le mode de fonctionnement de sa politique au quotidien.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.informaworld.com/openurl?genre=article&doi=10.1080/09578810701853215&magic=repec&7C&7C8674ECAB8BB840C6AD35DC6213A474B5
File Format: text/html
File Function:
Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Publisher Info
Article provided by Taylor and Francis Journals in its journal The European Journal of Development Research.

Volume (Year): 20 (2008)
Issue (Month): 1 ()
Pages: 74-87
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML, plain text, BibTeX, RIS (EndNote), ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:taf:eurjdr:v:20:y:2008:i:1:p:74-87

Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~content=t713635016

Order Information:
Web: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/subscription.html

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).

Related research
Keywords: Ghana ownership harmonisation multi-donor budget support poverty reduction strategy papers (PRSP)

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? Cannot find something on IDEAS? Encourage the publisher to index it! Instructions.

This page was last updated on 2008-7-16.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.