IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/euract/v16y2007i2p399-427.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Corporate Compliance with Non-Mandatory Statements of Best Practice: The Case of the ASB Statement on Interim Reports

Author

Listed:
  • Musa Mangena
  • Venancio Tauringana

Abstract

This paper contributes to our understanding of compliance with non-mandatory statements of best practice. Specifically, we examine the efficacy of agency-related mechanisms on the degree of disclosure compliance with the ASB Statement on interim reports. Using data drawn from a sample of 259 UK companies listed on the London Stock Exchange, we show that although overall disclosure compliance is high (74.5% of the items of information being disclosed), companies do not fully comply with the ASB Statement on interim reports. We employ an ordinary least square (OLS) regression model to establish whether selected company-specific and corporate governance characteristics (proxying for agency-related mechanisms) are related to the degree of disclosure compliance. Our results indicate that multiple listing, company size, interim dividend and new share issuance are positively associated with the degree of compliance. We also find that the degree of disclosure compliance is positively associated with auditor involvement, audit committee independence and audit committee financial expertise. These results have important implications for policy because they suggest that whilst agency-related mechanisms may motivate compliance with best practice non-mandatory statements, full compliance may be unattainable without regulations.

Suggested Citation

  • Musa Mangena & Venancio Tauringana, 2007. "Corporate Compliance with Non-Mandatory Statements of Best Practice: The Case of the ASB Statement on Interim Reports," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(2), pages 399-427.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:euract:v:16:y:2007:i:2:p:399-427
    DOI: 10.1080/09638180701391014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09638180701391014
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09638180701391014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cadbury, Adrian, 2002. "Corporate Governance and Chairmanship: A Personal View," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199252008.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Laura Bini & Francesco Giunta & Rebecca Miccini & Lorenzo Simoni, 2023. "Corporate governance quality and non-financial KPI disclosure comparability: UK evidence," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 27(1), pages 43-74, March.
    2. Isabel-María García-Sánchez & Nicola Raimo & Víctor Amor-Esteban & Filippo Vitolla, 2023. "Board committees and non-financial information assurance services," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 27(1), pages 1-42, March.
    3. B. Charumathi & Latha Ramesh, 2020. "Impact of Voluntary Disclosure on Valuation of Firms: Evidence from Indian Companies," Vision, , vol. 24(2), pages 194-203, June.
    4. Niclas Hellman & Jordi Carenys & Soledad Moya Gutierrez, 2018. "Introducing More IFRS Principles of Disclosure – Will the Poor Disclosers Improve?," Accounting in Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(2), pages 242-321, May.
    5. Aladdin Dwekat & Elies Seguí‐Mas & Guillermina Tormo‐Carbó & Pedro Carmona, 2020. "Corporate Governance Configurations and Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Audit Committee and Board characteristics," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(6), pages 2879-2892, November.
    6. Tauringana, Venancio & Chithambo, Lyton, 2015. "The effect of DEFRA guidance on greenhouse gas disclosure," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(4), pages 425-444.
    7. Ala’ Hussein Albawwat & Mohamad Yazis Ali Basah, 2015. "The Impact of Shariah Approved Companies on the Relationship between Corporate Governance Structure and Voluntary Disclosure of Interim Financial Reporting in Jordan," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 5(2), pages 66-85, April.
    8. Sardar Ahmad & Saeed Akbar & Devendra Kodwani & Anwar Halari & Syed Zubair Shah, 2023. "Compliance or non‐compliance during financial crisis: Does it matter?," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(3), pages 2348-2366, July.
    9. Iwasaki, Ichiro & 岩﨑, 一郎, 2013. "What Determines Audit Independence and Expertise in Russia? Firm-Level Evidence," RRC Working Paper Series 27_v2, Russian Research Center, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    10. Li, Jing & Mangena, Musa & Pike, Richard, 2012. "The effect of audit committee characteristics on intellectual capital disclosure," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 98-110.
    11. Ranjith Appuhami & Shamim Tashakor, 2017. "The Impact of Audit Committee Characteristics on CSR Disclosure: An Analysis of Australian Firms," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 27(4), pages 400-420, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Iraj Hashi, 2003. "The Legal Framework for Effective Corporate Governance: Comparative Analysis of Provisions in Selected Transition Economies," CASE Network Studies and Analyses 0268, CASE-Center for Social and Economic Research.
    2. Donaldson, Jason & Piacentino, Giorgia & Malenko, Nadya, 2017. "Deadlock on the Board," CEPR Discussion Papers 12503, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    3. Mervyn K. Lewis, 2014. "Principles of Islamic corporate governance," Chapters, in: M. Kabir Hassan & Mervyn K. Lewis (ed.), Handbook on Islam and Economic Life, chapter 13, pages iii-iii, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Melinda Timea Fülöp, 2013. "Correlation Analysis of the Audit Committee and Profitability Indicators," Annals of the University of Petrosani, Economics, University of Petrosani, Romania, vol. 13(1), pages 139-148.
    5. Andrea Melis, 2011. "Martin Hilb: New corporate governance," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 15(3), pages 509-514, August.
    6. David Seidl & Paul Sanderson & John Roberts, 2009. "Applying 'Comply-or-Explain': Conformance with Codes of Corporate Governance in the UK and Germany," Working Papers wp389, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
    7. George Silviu CORDOȘ & Melinda Times FÜLÖP, 2014. "Audit Reporting And Corporate Governance: Links And Implications," SEA - Practical Application of Science, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 3, pages 146-154, April.
    8. Axel V. Werder & Till Talaulicar & Georg L. Kolat, 2005. "Compliance with the German Corporate Governance Code: an empirical analysis of the compliance statements by German listed companies," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(2), pages 178-187, March.
    9. Daing Maruak Sadek & Khilmy Abd Rahim & Zakaria Abas, 2018. "A Comparison between Corporate Governance and Corporate Governance in Islamic Perspective," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 8(4), pages 220-229, April.
    10. Eythor Ivar Jonsson, 2005. "The Role Model of the Board: a preliminary study of the roles of Icelandic boards," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(5), pages 710-717, September.
    11. Jordi Moreno-Gené & José Luis Gallizo, 2021. "Intergenerational Differences in Family Business Management and Their Influence on Business Profitability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-17, June.
    12. Yeh, Chien Mu & Taylor, Tracy & Hoye, Russell, 2009. "Board roles in organisations with a dual board system: Empirical evidence from Taiwanese nonprofit sport organisations," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 91-100, May.
    13. Michael Useem, 2003. "Corporate Governance is Directors Making Decisions: Reforming the Outward Foundations for Inside Decision Making," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 7(3), pages 241-253, September.
    14. Al-ahdal, Waleed M. & Alsamhi, Mohammed H. & Tabash, Mosab I. & Farhan, Najib H.S., 2020. "The impact of corporate governance on financial performance of Indian and GCC listed firms: An empirical investigation," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    15. Victor Dulewicz & Peter Herbert, 2004. "Does the Composition and Practice of Boards of Directors Bear Any Relationship to the Performance of their Companies?," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(3), pages 263-280, July.
    16. Donald Kempf, 2008. "Corporate governance as religion," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 117-131, February.
    17. Stilpon Nestor, 2005. "Falling Between the Cracks: privatisation and corporate governance in the European telecom industry," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(2), pages 137-155, March.
    18. John Buchanan & Dominic H. Chai & Simon Deakin, 2018. "Unexpected Corporate Outcomes from Hedge Find Activism in Japan," Working Papers wp494, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
    19. Rahul Govind Pramani & Sandeep Goel & Rupamanjari Sinha Ray & A. Sarath Babu, 2023. "Corporate governance practices in the mining industry of India: an application of CG index," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 36(3), pages 481-498, September.
    20. Harry Buren & Michelle Greenwood, 2013. "The Genesis of Employment Ethics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 117(4), pages 707-719, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:euract:v:16:y:2007:i:2:p:399-427. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/REAR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.