IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cjutxx/v24y2017i3p47-66.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Co-working Spaces in Milan: Location Patterns and Urban Effects

Author

Listed:
  • Ilaria Mariotti
  • Carolina Pacchi
  • Stefano Di Vita

Abstract

The present paper investigates the location patterns and the effects co-working spaces generate on the urban context, issues that have been neglected by the existing literature. The focus is on Milan, the core of the Italian knowledge-based, creative, digital, and sharing economy, and the city hosting the largest number of co-working spaces in Italy. The paper addresses three main questions: (1) Where are the main locations of co-working spaces in Milan? (2) Are there any transformative effects of co-working spaces, respectively at the urban scale and at the very local scale? (3) What are their impacts in terms of spatial transformation and in terms of innovation in practices (for instance, work, leisure, or culture)? Desk research showed that location patterns of co-working spaces resemble those of service industries in urban areas, with a propinquity to the so-called “creative clusters.” Field research shed light on urban effects, such as the participation of workers in co-working spaces in local community initiatives, their contribution to urban revitalization trends, and micro-scale physical transformations. The paper, therefore, helps to fill the gap in the literature about the location patterns of these new working spaces and their urban effects at different scales, both in terms of urban spaces and practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Ilaria Mariotti & Carolina Pacchi & Stefano Di Vita, 2017. "Co-working Spaces in Milan: Location Patterns and Urban Effects," Journal of Urban Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(3), pages 47-66, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:cjutxx:v:24:y:2017:i:3:p:47-66
    DOI: 10.1080/10630732.2017.1311556
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10630732.2017.1311556
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10630732.2017.1311556?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Coll Martínez, Eva & Méndez Ortega, Carles,, 2019. "Location of Co-Working Spaces in the city," Working Papers 2072/351588, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Department of Economics.
    2. Fang Zhao & Catherine Prentice & Joseph Wallis & Arvind Patel & Marie-France Waxin, 2020. "An integrative study of the implications of the rise of coworking spaces in smart cities," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 8(2), pages 467-486, December.
    3. Niccolò PIERI & Millán Dà AZ-FONCEA & Carmen MARCUELLO & Ermanno TORTIA, 2020. "Social Incubators and Social Innovation in Cities: A Qualitative Analysis," CIRIEC Working Papers 2017, CIRIEC - Université de Liège.
    4. Bruno Trapanese & Ilaria Mariotti, 2022. "Socio-Cultural Hybrid Spaces in Milan Coping with the Covid-19 Pandemic," Romanian Journal of Regional Science, Romanian Regional Science Association, vol. 16(2), pages 39-59, DECEMBER.
    5. Mittal Ella & Rani Tamanna, 2022. "Do Social Interactions Really Moderate Job Productivity in Coworking Spaces?," Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 10(1), pages 145-160, September.
    6. Weiwu Wang & Jingyi Liang & Jie Niu, 2022. "Site Selection of Co-Working Spaces under the Influence of Multiple Factors: A Case Study in Hangzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-18, February.
    7. Swantje Robelski & Helena Keller & Volker Harth & Stefanie Mache, 2019. "Coworking Spaces: The Better Home Office? A Psychosocial and Health-Related Perspective on an Emerging Work Environment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-22, July.
    8. Christer Gustafsson & Elisabetta Lazzaro, 2021. "The Innovative Response of Cultural and Creative Industries to Major European Societal Challenges: Toward a Knowledge and Competence Base," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-20, November.
    9. Sofia Morgado, 2021. "Urban Rehabilitation, Social Innovation, and New Working Spaces in Lisbon," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-14, October.
    10. Guy Baudelle & Sébastien Bourdin & Louis-Thibault Buron & Clément Marinos, 2023. "Third Places in France: what Role for Areas Outside the Metropolis? [Les tiers-lieux en France : quelle place pour les zones hors métropole ?]," Post-Print hal-04302219, HAL.
    11. Di Matteo, Dante & Mariotti, Ilaria & Rossi, Federica, 2023. "Transport infrastructure and economic performance: An evaluation of the Milan-Bologna high-speed rail corridor," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    12. Ilaria Mariotti & Mina Akhavan, 2021. "Gli spazi di coworking prima e durante la pandemia covid-19: tipologie, geografia ed effetti," ECONOMIA E SOCIET? REGIONALE, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 0(1), pages 66-84.
    13. Ludovica Leone & Anna Chiara Scapolan & Fabrizio Montanari & Matteo Rinaldini & Damiano Razzoli, 2021. "Gli spazi collaborativi in emilia-romagna: caratteristiche e ripresa post covid," ECONOMIA E SOCIET? REGIONALE, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 0(1), pages 85-97.
    14. Jasmina Berbegal-Mirabent, 2021. "What Do We Know about Co-Working Spaces? Trends and Challenges Ahead," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-30, January.
    15. Eva Coll-Martínez, 2019. "Creativity and the city: testing the attenuation of agglomeration economies in Barcelona," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 43(3), pages 365-395, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cjutxx:v:24:y:2017:i:3:p:47-66. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cjut20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.