IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cjudxx/v22y2017i6p778-795.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Urban green space for health and well-being: developing an ‘affordances’ framework for planning and design

Author

Listed:
  • Mick Lennon
  • Owen Douglas
  • Mark Scott

Abstract

A vast literature exploring environmental influences on human health and well-being has provided renewed interest in connecting planning for the built environment with health initiatives. In response, planners and urban designers have been tasked with translating this knowledge into spatial planning and design schemes. This paper responds to an identified need for a conceptually-informed framework for green space planning and design for health and well-being that moves beyond attribute-descriptive studies. The notion of an ‘affordances star’ is proposed as a means to maximize the functionality and inclusivity of green space for health and well-being.

Suggested Citation

  • Mick Lennon & Owen Douglas & Mark Scott, 2017. "Urban green space for health and well-being: developing an ‘affordances’ framework for planning and design," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(6), pages 778-795, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:cjudxx:v:22:y:2017:i:6:p:778-795
    DOI: 10.1080/13574809.2017.1336058
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13574809.2017.1336058
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13574809.2017.1336058?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lisa Orii & Luis Alonso & Kent Larson, 2020. "Methodology for Establishing Well-Being Urban Indicators at the District Level to be Used on the CityScope Platform," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-25, November.
    2. Joanna Wysmułek & Maria Hełdak & Anatolii Kucher, 2020. "The Analysis of Green Areas’ Accessibility in Comparison with Statistical Data in Poland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-17, June.
    3. Olsen, Jonathan R. & Nicholls, Natalie & Mitchell, Richard, 2019. "Are urban landscapes associated with reported life satisfaction and inequalities in life satisfaction at the city level? A cross-sectional study of 66 European cities," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 263-274.
    4. Anita Kwartnik-Pruc & Anna Trembecka, 2021. "Public Green Space Policy Implementation: A Case Study of Krakow, Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-21, January.
    5. Juyoung Lee & Minji Kang & Sungku Lee & Seoyong Lee, 2022. "Effects of Vegetation Structure on Psychological Restoration in an Urban Rooftop Space," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-11, December.
    6. Scott C. Brown & Tatiana Perrino & Joanna Lombard & Kefeng Wang & Matthew Toro & Tatjana Rundek & Carolina Marinovic Gutierrez & Chuanhui Dong & Elizabeth Plater-Zyberk & Maria I. Nardi & Jack Kardys , 2018. "Health Disparities in the Relationship of Neighborhood Greenness to Mental Health Outcomes in 249,405 U.S. Medicare Beneficiaries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-11, March.
    7. Francisco J. Tapiador & Andrés Navarro & Josu Mezo & Sergio de la Llave & Jesús Muñoz, 2021. "Urban Vegetation Leveraging Actions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, April.
    8. Saruhan Mosler & Peter Hobson, 2021. "Close-To-Nature Heuristic Design Principles for Future Urban Green Infrastructure," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 67-79.
    9. Lennon, Mick & Douglas, Owen & Scott, Mark, 2019. "Responsive environments: An outline of a method for determining context sensitive planning interventions to enhance health and wellbeing," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 68-78.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cjudxx:v:22:y:2017:i:6:p:778-795. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cjud20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.