IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ceasxx/v69y2017i1p157-170.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Emerging Hydrocarbon Interdependence between Russia and China: Institutional and Systemic Implications

Author

Listed:
  • Catherine Locatelli
  • Mehdi Abbas
  • Sylvain Rossiaud

Abstract

The different agreements on oil and natural gas signed by Russian and Chinese companies testify to the profound changes in the oil and gas policies of both Russia and China. We stress the importance of the contractual norms which structure the energy interdependency of the countries involved. As there is no international multilateral framework able to manage energy supply security, the way the countries involved construct their energy interdependence to an extent defines models of sectoral governance.

Suggested Citation

  • Catherine Locatelli & Mehdi Abbas & Sylvain Rossiaud, 2017. "The Emerging Hydrocarbon Interdependence between Russia and China: Institutional and Systemic Implications," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 69(1), pages 157-170, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:ceasxx:v:69:y:2017:i:1:p:157-170
    DOI: 10.1080/09668136.2016.1274020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09668136.2016.1274020
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09668136.2016.1274020?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paik, Keun-Wook, 2012. "Sino-Russian Oil and Gas Cooperation: The Reality and Implications," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199656356.
    2. Sadek Boussena & Jean-Pierre Pauwels & Catherine Locatelli & Carine Swartenbroekx, 2006. "Le défi pétrolier : questions actuelles du pétrole et du gaz," Post-Print halshs-00009622, HAL.
    3. Sadek Boussena & Catherine Locatelli, 2016. "Guerre des prix ou instrumentalisation de l'incertitude sur les prix : quelle stratégie pour un fournisseur dominant sur le marché gazier européen ?," Working Papers hal-01284518, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Catherine Locatelli & Mehdi Abbas & Sylvain Rossiaud, 2015. "Russia and China hydrocarbon relations A building block toward international hydrocarbon regulation?," Working Papers hal-01246346, HAL.
    2. Catherine Locatelli, 2010. "Russian and Caspian Hydrocarbons: Energy Supply Stakes for the European Union," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 62(6), pages 959-971.
    3. Catherine Locatelli, 2020. "Une lecture institutionnaliste de la réforme du secteur gazier russe," Working Papers hal-02734835, HAL.
    4. Finon, Dominique & Locatelli, Catherine, 2008. "Russian and European gas interdependence: Could contractual trade channel geopolitics?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 423-442, January.
    5. Catherine Locatelli, 2015. "La question du gaz dans les relations entre l'UE, la Russie et l'Ukraine," Post-Print hal-01174452, HAL.
    6. Xiaoguang Wang, 2020. "Leadership-building dilemmas in emerging powers’ economic diplomacy: Russia’s energy diplomacy and China’s OBOR," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 117-138, March.
    7. Sylvain Rossiaud & Catherine Locatelli, 2009. "The obstacles in the way of stabilising the Russian oil model," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(4), pages 425-438.
    8. Dominique Finon & Catherine Locatelli, 2008. "Russian and European gas interdependence. Can market forces balance out geopolitics?," Post-Print halshs-00129618, HAL.
    9. Reymond, Mathias, 2012. "Measuring vulnerability to shocks in the gas market in South America," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 754-761.
    10. Motomura, Masumi, 2014. "Japan’s need for Russian oil and gas: A shift in energy flows to the Far East," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 68-79.
    11. Dominique Finon & Catherine Locatelli, 2006. "L'interdépendance gazière de la Russie et de l'Union européenne : quel équilibre entre le marché et la géopolitique ?," Post-Print halshs-00119602, HAL.
    12. Catherine Locatelli, 2008. "Gazprom's export strategies under the institutional constraint of the Russian gas market," Post-Print halshs-00341660, HAL.
    13. Liu, Dawei & Yamaguchi, Kensuke & Yoshikawa, Hisashi, 2017. "Understanding the motivations behind the Myanmar-China energy pipeline: Multiple streams and energy politics in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 403-412.
    14. Reymond, Mathias, 2007. "European key issues concerning natural gas: Dependence and vulnerability," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(8), pages 4169-4176, August.
    15. Catherine Locatelli, 2014. "La voie caucasienne, une alternative crédible pour l'approvisionnement gazier de l'UE ?," Post-Print halshs-01057368, HAL.
    16. Locatelli, C., 2020. "Une lecture institutionnaliste de la réforme du secteur gazier russe," Working Papers 2020-04, Grenoble Applied Economics Laboratory (GAEL).
    17. Keun-Wook Paik, 2013. "The role of Russian gas in China’s energy supply strategy," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 323-338, September.
    18. Carine Swartenbroekx, 2007. "The gas chain : influence of its specificities on the liberalisation process," Working Paper Document 122, National Bank of Belgium.
    19. Catherine Locatelli, 2015. "Les échanges gaziers entre la Russie et la Chine à l’ aune de leur sécurité énergétique," Post-Print hal-01206226, HAL.
    20. P. Butzen & W. Melyn & H. Zimmer, 2007. "Recent commodity price developments : causes and effects," Economic Review, National Bank of Belgium, issue ii, pages 29-45, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ceasxx:v:69:y:2017:i:1:p:157-170. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ceas .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.