IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/bushst/v41y1999i1p88-116.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Corporate Governance in France and the UK: Long-Term Perspectives on Contemporary Institutional Arrangements

Author

Listed:
  • Mairi Maclean

Abstract

The Cadbury Report on the financial aspects of corporate governance, published in the UK in 1992, was landmark in thinking on governance, leading to the publication in Francen in 1995 of the Vienot Report, which boldly urged the removal of the cross-shareholdings which have formed the bedrock of French capitalism for three decades. This article considers the impact of this new emphasis on corporate governance on patterns of governance in Britain and France, examining matters of ownership and control, board membership and business elites, business cultures and decision-making, and responsibilities to shareholders. It questions whether the new focus on corporate governance has brought closer together the ways in which businesses are managed in Britain and France, towards a European model, or whether indeed France is gradually embracing the Anglo-Saxon model, and finds that such convergence as has occurred since the Second World War shows as yet no sign of leading to uniformity. Finally, the article suggests that the contemporary corporate governance debate offers a framework through which the past may be revisited and, potentially, reassessed, business historians being well placed to shed light on the competing natures as well as the competing forms of corporate governance in the world today.

Suggested Citation

  • Mairi Maclean, 1999. "Corporate Governance in France and the UK: Long-Term Perspectives on Contemporary Institutional Arrangements," Business History, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(1), pages 88-116.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:bushst:v:41:y:1999:i:1:p:88-116
    DOI: 10.1080/00076799900000203
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00076799900000203
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00076799900000203?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David Carassus & Khaled Albouaini & Marie Caussimont, 2013. "Une analyse de l'Audit Expectation Gap dans le contexte français," Post-Print hal-02432110, HAL.
    2. Branston, J. Robert & Cowling, Keith & Sugden, Roger, 2002. "Corporate Governance And The Public Interest," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 626, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
    3. Malcolm Anderson, 2000. "Accounting History Publications 1999," Accounting History Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 385-393.
    4. Harvey, Charles & Maclean, Mairi & Price, Michael, 2020. "Executive remuneration and the limits of disclosure as an instrument of corporate governance," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    5. Branston, J. Robert & Cowling, Keith & Sugden, Roger, 2001. "Corporate Governance and the Public Interest," Economic Research Papers 269400, University of Warwick - Department of Economics.
    6. Christopher Nobes & Alan Roberts, 2000. "Towards a Unifying Model of Systems of Law, Corporate Financing, Accounting and Corporate Governance," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 10(20), pages 26-34, March.
    7. Sarah Federman, 2021. "Corporate Leadership and Mass Atrocity," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 172(3), pages 407-423, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:bushst:v:41:y:1999:i:1:p:88-116. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/FBSH20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.