IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/bindes/v39y2003i1p51-74.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Indonesian Trade Liberalisation: Estimating The Gains

Author

Listed:
  • Tubagus Feridhanusetyawan
  • Mari Pangestu

Abstract

Indonesia has undergone comprehensive trade liberalisation by participating in multilateral and regional trade arrangements and by conducting unilateral liberalisation. This paper evaluates the different paths of liberalisation the country has followed, and measures their effects on the economy. It considers the impact of several liberalisation scenarios: unilateral liberalisation; regional liberalisation through APEC (Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation) and AFTA (the ASEAN Free Trade Area); and multilateral trade liberalisation through the Uruguay Round (UR). The results show that the full implementation of UR and APEC liberalisation would greatly benefit Indonesia, and that unilateral liberalisation, carried out in conjunction with the UR commitment, would lead to large welfare gains. On the other hand, the creation of AFTA is expected to add little to welfare in Indonesia or in the other ASEAN member countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Tubagus Feridhanusetyawan & Mari Pangestu, 2003. "Indonesian Trade Liberalisation: Estimating The Gains," Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(1), pages 51-74.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:bindes:v:39:y:2003:i:1:p:51-74
    DOI: 10.1080/00074910302008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00074910302008
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00074910302008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. ANDO Mitsuyo, 2009. "Impacts of FTAs in East Asia: CGE Simulation Analysis," Discussion papers 09037, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    2. Vanzetti, David & McGuire, Greg & Prabowo, 2004. "Trade Policy at the Crossroads - The Indonesian Story," Conference papers 331197, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    3. J. Thomas Lindblad, 2007. "Indonesia and China Today," Journal of Developing Societies, , vol. 23(3), pages 369-392, July.
    4. Yessi Vadila & Budy P. Resosudarmo, 2020. "Tariff reform and income inequality in Indonesia," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(3), pages 455-475, June.
    5. Yoko Oishi & Dainn Wie, 2018. "Importing Inequality: Trade Liberalization, Technology, and Women's Employment," GRIPS Discussion Papers 18-16, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies.
    6. Kyunghoon Kim & Arriya Mungsunti & Andy Sumner & Arief Anshory Yusuf, 2020. "Structural transformation and inclusive growth: Kuznets' 'developer's dilemma' in Indonesia," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2020-31, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    7. Dini Yuniarti, 2010. "Agreement on agriculture and Indonesian rice import," Economic Journal of Emerging Markets, Universitas Islam Indonesia, vol. 2(3), pages 299-302, April.
    8. Muhammad Sofjan, 2017. "The Effect of Liberalization on Export-import in Indonesia," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 7(2), pages 672-676.
    9. Lee, Hiro & Roland-Holst, David, 2000. "Trade and Transmission of Endogenous Growth Effects: Japanese Economic Reform as an Externality for East Asian Economies," Conference papers 330892, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    10. Acharya, Sanjaya, 2011. "Making unilateral trade liberalisation beneficial to the poor," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 60-71, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:bindes:v:39:y:2003:i:1:p:51-74. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CBIE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.