IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v53y2021i19p2192-2205.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Out-of-sample realized volatility forecasting: does the support vector regression compete combination methods

Author

Listed:
  • Gaoxun Zhang
  • Gaoxiu Qiao

Abstract

This article investigates whether the nonlinear support vector regression method under the Heterogeneous Auto-Regressive model (SVR-HAR) can compete for combination methods in terms of out-of-sample realized volatility forecasting. Empirical analyses are conducted based on the CSI 300 index high-frequency data, two new combination methods are employed and compared with the forecasting ability of the SVR method. The empirical results show that SVR-HAR models outperform individual models and all the combination methods, although the new combination methods are superior to other combination strategies. Specifically, HAR models with realized semi-variances as regressors obtains the lowest forecasting errors, confirming the strong forecasting ability of nonlinear SVR method and the realized semi-variances. The portfolio performance further confirms the highest economic value for models employing realized semi-variances and nonlinear SVR method in terms of volatility forecasting.

Suggested Citation

  • Gaoxun Zhang & Gaoxiu Qiao, 2021. "Out-of-sample realized volatility forecasting: does the support vector regression compete combination methods," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(19), pages 2192-2205, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:53:y:2021:i:19:p:2192-2205
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2020.1856326
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2020.1856326
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2020.1856326?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gaoxiu Qiao & Yangli Cao & Feng Ma & Weiping Li, 2023. "Liquidity and realized covariance forecasting: a hybrid method with model uncertainty," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 64(1), pages 437-463, January.
    2. Auh, Jun Kyung & Cho, Wonho, 2023. "Factor-based portfolio optimization," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:53:y:2021:i:19:p:2192-2205. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.