IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/acctbr/v27y1996i1p17-40.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal Disbursement of a Sunk Resource and Decentralised Cost Allocation

Author

Listed:
  • M. Gietzmann
  • A. Ostaszewski

Abstract

We consider whether the allocation of the sunk cost of a central resource to operating divisions can be consistent with economically optimal resource consumption decisions. When it is recognised that the central resource is scarce, one may, in principle, defend the allocation of sunk cost, if it measures the opportunity cost of usage. However, typically it has been proposed that such allocations are, at best, a proxy for opportunity cost. Applying classical control theory techniques in a wide range of operating environments, we are able to identify cost allocations that exactly equal opportunity cost. Hence, for our model environment, we provide a rationale for sunk cost allocation in terms of guiding optimal decisions, in contrast to the traditional defence in terms of providing a proxy for opportunity cost. We demonstrate clearly how cost allocations are related to opportunity costs, and identify the circumstances under which the allocation of full costs or alternatively a fixed proportion (related to acquisition conditions) of costs, results in the implementation of economically optimal resource consumption decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • M. Gietzmann & A. Ostaszewski, 1996. "Optimal Disbursement of a Sunk Resource and Decentralised Cost Allocation," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(1), pages 17-40.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:acctbr:v:27:y:1996:i:1:p:17-40
    DOI: 10.1080/00014788.1996.9729529
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00014788.1996.9729529
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00014788.1996.9729529?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wayne A. Leeman, 1965. "Letter to the Editor—Comments on Preceding Note," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(4), pages 680-681, August.
    2. Sanjeev Dewan & Haim Mendelson, 1990. "User Delay Costs and Internal Pricing for a Service Facility," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(12), pages 1502-1517, December.
    3. RAMJI BALAKRISHNAN & DOUGLAS V. DeJONG, 1993. "The Role of Cost Allocations in the Acquisition and Use of Common Resources," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(2), pages 395-414, March.
    4. Wayne A. Leeman, 1964. "Letter to the Editor—The Reduction of Queues Through the Use of Price," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 12(5), pages 783-785, October.
    5. Suresh Radhakrishnan & Kashi R. Balachandran, 1995. "Delay Cost and Incentive Schemes for Multiple Users," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(4), pages 646-652, April.
    6. Bruce L. Miller & A. G. Buckman, 1987. "Cost Allocation and Opportunity Costs," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(5), pages 626-639, May.
    7. Thomas L. Saaty, 1965. "Letter to the Editor—The Burdens of Queuing Charges—Comments on a Letter by Leeman," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(4), pages 679-679, August.
    8. Balachandran, K R & Schaefer, Mark E, 1979. "Class Dominance Characteristics at a Service Facility," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 47(2), pages 515-519, March.
    9. Naor, P, 1969. "The Regulation of Queue Size by Levying Tolls," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 37(1), pages 15-24, January.
    10. John S. Hughes, 1993. "Discussion of “Capacity Cost and Capacity Allocation†," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(2), pages 661-666, March.
    11. Knudsen, Niels Chr, 1972. "Individual and Social Optimization in a Multiserver Queue with a General Cost-Benefit Structure," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 40(3), pages 515-528, May.
    12. Seungjin Whang, 1989. "Cost Allocation Revisited: An Optimality Result," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(10), pages 1264-1273, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sumita, Ushio & Masuda, Yasushi & Yamakawa, Shigetaka, 2001. "Optimal internal pricing and capacity planning for service facility with finite buffer," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(1), pages 192-205, January.
    2. Balachandran, Kashi R. & Radhakrishnan, Suresh, 1996. "Cost of congestion, operational efficiency and management accounting," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(2), pages 237-245, March.
    3. S. Rao & E. R. Petersen, 1998. "Optimal Pricing of Priority Services," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 46(1), pages 46-56, February.
    4. van Ackere, Ann, 1996. "The management of congestion," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(2), pages 223-225, March.
    5. van Ackere, Ann, 1995. "Capacity management: Pricing strategy, performance and the role of information," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 89-100, June.
    6. Vernon N. Hsu & Susan H. Xu & Boris Jukic, 2009. "Optimal Scheduling and Incentive Compatible Pricing for a Service System with Quality of Service Guarantees," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 11(3), pages 375-396, May.
    7. Radhakrishnan, Suresh & Balachandran, Kashi R., 1995. "Stochastic choice hazard and incentives in a common service facility," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 81(2), pages 324-335, March.
    8. Philipp Afèche & Haim Mendelson, 2004. "Pricing and Priority Auctions in Queueing Systems with a Generalized Delay Cost Structure," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(7), pages 869-882, July.
    9. Larsen, Christian, 1998. "Investigating sensitivity and the impact of information on pricing decisions in an M/M/1/ [infinity] queueing model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 365-377, September.
    10. Radhakrishnan, Suresh & Balachandran, Kashi R., 2004. "Service capacity decision and incentive compatible cost allocation for reporting usage forecasts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(1), pages 180-195, August.
    11. Kyle Y. Lin & Sheldon M. Ross, 2003. "Admission Control with Incomplete Information of a Queueing System," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 51(4), pages 645-654, August.
    12. Fajardo, Val Andrei & Drekic, Steve, 2015. "Controlling the workload of M/G/1 queues via the q-policy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 243(2), pages 607-617.
    13. Qiuping Yu & Gad Allon & Achal Bassamboo & Seyed Iravani, 2018. "Managing Customer Expectations and Priorities in Service Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(8), pages 3942-3970, August.
    14. Vasco F. Alves, 2019. "Pricing and waiting time decisions in a health care market with private and public provision," Journal of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(1), pages 174-195, January.
    15. Wang, E. T. G., 2000. "Information and incentives in computing services supply: The effect of limited system choices," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(3), pages 503-518, September.
    16. Wenhui Zhou & Weixiang Huang & Vernon N. Hsu & Pengfei Guo, 2023. "On the Benefit of Privatization in a Mixed Duopoly Service System," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(3), pages 1486-1499, March.
    17. Christian Haxholdt & Erik R. Larsen & Ann van Ackere, 2003. "Mode Locking and Chaos in a Deterministic Queueing Model with Feedback," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(6), pages 816-830, June.
    18. Baric{s} Ata & Shiri Shneorson, 2006. "Dynamic Control of an M/M/1 Service System with Adjustable Arrival and Service Rates," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(11), pages 1778-1791, November.
    19. Michael Sattinger, 2002. "A Queuing Model of the Market for Access to Trading Partners," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 43(2), pages 533-548, May.
    20. Vasco F. Alves, 2021. "Endogenous queue number determination in G/M/s systems," 4OR, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 113-126, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:acctbr:v:27:y:1996:i:1:p:17-40. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RABR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.